YP44
Registered User
if he gets $5M i hope it is over 8 years. Go big or go home gamble for LA.That says he's probably not a 55g guy.
If he gets 50pts this year, he's getting $5m.
if he gets $5M i hope it is over 8 years. Go big or go home gamble for LA.That says he's probably not a 55g guy.
If he gets 50pts this year, he's getting $5m.
Durzi woudl get benched by Sutter keeping an eye on this
Breakout - he still needs to learn how to keep this pace across an entire season. Conditioning, proper diet and more experience will help with that.In Vilardi's first 15 games, he had 10 goals and 5 assists for 15 points.
In the last 12 games, he has 3 goals and 1 assist for 4 points.
True breakout year or fluke start?
Is that even mathematically possible? I know it was a joke. But now I am wondering if there something i'm missing in understanding +/- ? I'm thinking it's very straightforward; and thus -3 would be the worst you could get in a 3-6 loss that you were on the scoring side of all three goals for.Durzi gets 3 pp goals, we concede 6 at even strength in a 3-6 loss. Durzi is -4 ....
No plus for goals scored on the PP.Is that even mathematically possible? I know it was a joke. But now I am wondering if there something i'm missing in understanding +/- ? I'm thinking it's very straightforward; and thus -3 would be the worst you could get in a 3-6 loss that you were on the scoring side of all three goals for.
You get a + for a even strength or short handed goal scored for, whilst you are on the ice. Conversely a minus for a es/sh goal against. If the goal is scored whilst a shift change is occurring and both players changing have their skates on the ice, the guy leaving the play is credited.Is that even mathematically possible? I know it was a joke. But now I am wondering if there something i'm missing in understanding +/- ? I'm thinking it's very straightforward; and thus -3 would be the worst you could get in a 3-6 loss that you were on the scoring side of all three goals for.
+/- only applies to even strength or when a shorthanded goal is scored. If a team scores while on the powerplay, they don't get a + and the shorthanded team doesn't get a -. However, if a shorthanded team scores, they get a + and the other team gets a -.Is that even mathematically possible? I know it was a joke. But now I am wondering if there something i'm missing in understanding +/- ? I'm thinking it's very straightforward; and thus -3 would be the worst you could get in a 3-6 loss that you were on the scoring side of all three goals for.
ok, it's confirmed -- i'm dumber than i thought. All this time i thought +/- was simply this very basic goals for/against stat. Never knew there was more to it. It's still a basic stat, but a little more to it. I've learned my one thing for the day before 1pm -- solid day!You get a + for a even strength or short handed goal scored for, whilst you are on the ice. Conversely a minus for a es/sh goal against. If the goal is scored whilst a shift change is occurring and both players changing have their skates on the ice, the guy leaving the play is credited.
Occasionally some weird situation occurs where the guy coming on touches the puck, the referee misses the two many men call and the stats guy has to make a judgement call. Damn annoying, but it did happen at least once a season for me but the officials in the uk were a very mixed bag.
There's more space down the middle of the ice. Vilardi excels when he uses that space.Wing is better - takes less energy. Jeff Carter came up as a center and played wing a lot and switched back and forth. There's hardly a difference other than the amount of skating.. centers skate more, have harder def assignments and take faceoffs. How does playing center give him more capability in your mind?
I agree he uses space well but he’s been very good at finding those soft spots playing wing.There's more space down the middle of the ice. Vilardi excels when he uses that space.
I miss Vilardi. The Vilardi that started the year.
Holding onto the 3rd position in the division for dear life, Edmonton 2 points behind with 2 games in hand, Calgary 3 points behind with 3 games in hand.
hahaha i can absolutely see that happeningTurcotte for Patrick Kane
Blake and Co then are shocked at his lack of backchecking and put him on the 4th line and PK
I’m more worried about Durzi/Roy since the majority of their giveaways tend to happen in our end and frequently behind goal.So, giveaways….
Last season the team was running at 6.79 giveaways per 60 minute, 4.84 in the DZ.
Selected players 21/22
GP64 Durzi 2.54 (2.1 DZ)
GP67 Roy at 2.09 (1.88)
GP40 Byfield 1.73 (0.49)
GP81 Kopitar 1.07 (0.61)
GP80 Kaliyev 1.18 (0.89)
GP39 Doughty 1.44 (1.14)
GP57 Anderson 1.36 (1.2)
GP41 Edler 1.27 (1.11)
GP70 Bjornfot 1.53 (1.43)
GP24 Spence 1.4 (1.27)
GP6 Walker 0.55 (0.55)
Note: Because they didn’t all play at the same amount of time you can’t add up the individual numbers to get the team totals… it’s slightly confusing. You’d have to factor in ice time shares etc… I don’t have time for that.
So this season.
Team 8.19 (5.36)
Selected Players 22/23
GP26 Durzi 2.99 (2.3)
GP29 Roy 2.61 (2.61)
GP8 Byfield 1.28 (1.28)
GP29 Kopitar 2.69 (1.66)
GP28 Kaliyev 1.83 (0.73)
GP29 Doughty 1.26 (1.1)
GP29 Anderson 0.96 (0.87)
GP25 Edler 2.23(2.07)
GP2 Bjornfot 0 (0)
GP24 Walker 1.86 (1.52)
GP9 Clarke 1.48 (0.98)
There’s also quite a big Corsi/Fenwick drop off throughout.
Discuss… symptom or cause (it’s both in reality). It’s a big increase with Kopitar and Edler both red flags (outliers in terms of increase), Durzi and Roy’s numbers are just ugly. Roy is worse because he’s supposed to be a defense first guy. Sample size plays a big part for guys like Clarke due to low total minutes, so 1 bad game can make a big difference.
Roy has been exceptionally poor on the puck this year, but a huge portion of that has to be attributed to playing with a partner who is rarely in the right place at the right time, and the extra second or so that it takes to try and pick out his stick position for a clean pass. When its not there, he just limply pushes the puck up the boards. He looked SO much better with Edler and Bjornfot.I’m more worried about Durzi/Roy since the majority of their giveaways tend to happen in our end and frequently behind goal.