I think it's a good move by Bergevin.
Because putting your 22 year old former first round pick on waivers without even letting him play more than a couple dozen games in the show can ever be a "good move"? Sure is great management to have a Michael Chaput on your team rather than investing on players development... Scherbak is raw and sure needs time but he's got the talent and attitude to be a top 9 player on any given team. If LA doesn't claim him, 20 other teams would have. Bergevin messed up another asset.
Is he better then Laine or Max Jones?Hope he enjoys playing Fortnite on western servers.
he's a very frustrating but skilled player. Put him with a sniper and he should do well if you can live with his below average defensive game and at times he just does dumb **** out there. But what a playmaker and he can snipe it. I really hope he does well, can't believe the Habs didn't at least give him a few games to see what he can do before risking losing him on waivers for nothing.
Why did you put your words in my quote? Can you edit your words into your own comment ?Because putting your 22 year old former first round pick on waivers without even letting him play more than a couple dozen games in the show can ever be a "good move"? Sure is great management to have a Michael Chaput on your team rather than investing on players development... Scherbak is raw and sure needs time but he's got the talent and attitude to be a top 9 player on any given team. If LA doesn't claim him, 20 other teams would have. Bergevin messed up another asset.
he loses a former 1st round Pick that was picked when he was GM for nothing..I think it's a good move by Bergevin.
I think it's a good move by Bergevin. Scherbak didn't play consistently enough to warrant making the team. If he can learn to always play a 200 ft game he will be a good player. If he can't learn to do that, he will be underwhelming. Cheers!
Scherbak didn't even play one NHL game this year. Habs made their decision based on practice. We will see how this kid does with a new coaching staff. He's got skills for sure but can he measure up to his potential ceiling with actual results? We will see
Better than not admitting his mistakes. He picked a guy who hasn't (yet) panned out and he's moved on. Good move.he loses a former 1st round Pick that was picked when he was GM for nothing..
Good move
Since he turned pro.
He was benched by Michel Therrien (he even said it was the first time he benched a player in a pre-season game!), Sylvain Lefebvre (AHL), and Claude Julien.
Some coaches allow the player to learn on the job but clearly... The MT and CJ types don't. I'm not high or low on Scherbak. I do know the skill is there but he is struggling to reach his potential. I just don't like this Rebound/Price season where we have middle of the pack strategy. We could of easily made room in the bottom of the line-up for DLR and Scherbak to learn on the job. But no, we are in a rebound year where we don't have time for players to learn on the job.
These players have been pros for 4 years and they stalled in their development. They will most likely never reach it.
Agreed but why not play them in the NHL for a larger sample size? Losing them for nothing is disappointing but what't the point? It comes down to a rebound/pride year. They can't tolerate learning on the job. I don't agree with this middle of the pack strategy
he loses a former 1st round Pick that was picked when he was GM for nothing..
Good move
I agree, but still... Calling waiving a former 1st round Pick a "good move" Is kinda idiotic.Not much he could do there to avoid it..
I agree, but still... Calling waiving a former 1st round Pick a "good move" Is kinda idiotic.
Any player under the age of 35 on waivers will be claimed by the Kings. They're that desperate.
Just curious, but what’s good asset management for a non waiver exempt player that can’t force themselves on to the team? You bench the guys that have shown more than said player to help the player out or something? Put the team concept 2nd or something? Just spitballing here, what do you think?