HockeyVirus
16/34/88/91/44 - Pathetic losers
- Nov 15, 2020
- 20,884
- 31,906
Weekes: LA Kings Brandt Clarke on the move?
- Thread starter HockeyVirus
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
- Oct 24, 2008
- 26,523
- 45,782
kingsfan28
Its A Kingspiracy !
Weekes is just stirring the pot, and just reckless rumor mongering, even by his standard. He just trying to get clicks, which is lame. Kings have been going 11/7 for months, and with Doughty's return go 12/6 for one game , with Clarke getting scratched for any number of reasons. And he's on the block? If they move one of their young dmen, it's Spence, not Clarke.
If hes out in LA how about this:
To Los Angeles: Miller, Desharnais, Dorrington, 2026 6th
To Vancouver: Clarke, 2025 3rd, 2026 5th
To Los Angeles: Miller, Desharnais, Dorrington, 2026 6th
To Vancouver: Clarke, 2025 3rd, 2026 5th
Gaylord Q Tinkledink
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2018
- 35,571
- 39,495
Daaaaaamn this is terrrrrible
I was just thinking over these past few weeks. He's been the source of so many illegitimate trade rumors. He's becoming the new hockey Buzz
hamzarocks
Registered User
Marner@50% for Kempe + Clarke + 2nd + 3rd
Complete your story Luc & Rob
Complete your story Luc & Rob
BigDaddyLurch
Exiled from Reality
The Leafs could sign Marner for 8 years, retain 50%, and I still wouldn't trade either of those assets for him
go4hockey
Registered User
He has no influence. He was brought in to sit on his boyfriend’s Luc lap. Blake just sucks.
go4hockey
Registered User
Don’t move any defenders. Just dress 11-7 the rest of the season and see what happens with 84 in the offseason. Missing a 4th liner that plays 9 minutes a game won’t be missed. Damn leadership can’t do much of anything right lately
go4hockey
Registered User
The worst part of this awful proposal is you think the Kings would be adding to Clarke For a pending UFA.
Sure do miss Bobby Mack, the lack of Professionalism today and the obsession with being the first to report news is a joke. Look at Frank Spaghetti incorrectly saying Kotkaniemi was traded to Colorado in the Necas deal. Weekes is no better, just an engagement baiter with his stupid videos and caption-less tweets.
HuGort
Registered User
milehigh11
Registered User
Pavels Dog
Registered User
Osprey
Registered User
- Feb 18, 2005
- 28,078
- 11,039
LA was shut out tonight after scratching Clarke and activating Doughty. Clarke > Doughty confirmed.
Seriously, they need Clarke's offense right now. I would've left him in and inserted Doughty in Moverare's spot. Doughty is experienced and smart enough to handle playing the left side on the sheltered 3rd pair while he gets up to speed, IMO.
Seriously, they need Clarke's offense right now. I would've left him in and inserted Doughty in Moverare's spot. Doughty is experienced and smart enough to handle playing the left side on the sheltered 3rd pair while he gets up to speed, IMO.
Petes2424
Registered User
- Aug 4, 2005
- 8,621
- 3,558
They find themselves in an interesting situation with Clarke. He has hit a wall somewhat. If you watched the Detroit game this week, you seen the big difference between Clarke and another of the 2021 Top 10 Dmen, in Simon Edvinsson. It was obviously night and day comparing the two. Clarke was honestly invisible most of the night, but it’s also not fair in many ways because Edvinsson looks like he might be a very special player.
One thing that’s effecting Clarke is, the ice time Jordan Spence is earning. You play your best players and right now Spence is just the better option and he’s taking that ice from Clarke.
So they have to do something to make sure Clarke keeps developing and Doughty returning doesn’t help. The problem is, he’s not going to get anything from going back to the AHL. So they have to figure out what they’re going to do with him. He has to play.
Anyone thinking this means Clarke is flopping, etc, just stop. He’s still a kid and they have ups and downs. We’ve seen him play some really good games in the NHL already, and there will be many more to come. The Kings would look back at the day they traded him and kick themselves for a decade.
As for Weekes mentioning his name like he has, it is now the second time this week I’ve heard his name popping up. I ignored the first time from an evaluator who contracts with teams. Blowing it off as just ridiculous but maybe there is something to it. Problem is, when teams trade young, high-end D prospects, they usually lose those trades.
They need to be very careful here.
One thing that’s effecting Clarke is, the ice time Jordan Spence is earning. You play your best players and right now Spence is just the better option and he’s taking that ice from Clarke.
So they have to do something to make sure Clarke keeps developing and Doughty returning doesn’t help. The problem is, he’s not going to get anything from going back to the AHL. So they have to figure out what they’re going to do with him. He has to play.
Anyone thinking this means Clarke is flopping, etc, just stop. He’s still a kid and they have ups and downs. We’ve seen him play some really good games in the NHL already, and there will be many more to come. The Kings would look back at the day they traded him and kick themselves for a decade.
As for Weekes mentioning his name like he has, it is now the second time this week I’ve heard his name popping up. I ignored the first time from an evaluator who contracts with teams. Blowing it off as just ridiculous but maybe there is something to it. Problem is, when teams trade young, high-end D prospects, they usually lose those trades.
They need to be very careful here.
RandomJetsFan
Registered User
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
I doubt the Kings move Clarke.
What do the Kings say would be their need if they move Clarke? Need for now and future?
What do the Kings say would be their need if they move Clarke? Need for now and future?
