KingsHockey24
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2013
- 14,598
- 13,457
Yes sir !So looks like we're getting Dallas unless we win our last game and Vegas loses in regulation? Is that right?
Yes sir !So looks like we're getting Dallas unless we win our last game and Vegas loses in regulation? Is that right?
Kings hold the tiebreaker on Vegas. A win and a Vegas regulation/OTL or SOL means Kings lock up #3 and play the Oilers.So looks like we're getting Dallas unless we win our last game and Vegas loses in regulation? Is that right?
Preface- I am a dumbass: but how could the Kings hold a tiebreaker on anyone with the huge number of OTLs?Kings hold the tiebreaker on Vegas. A win and a Vegas regulation/OTL or SOL means Kings lock up #3 and play the Oilers.
Kings can still get in #3 if Vegas loses in reg and the Kings get at least 1pt in their last game to tie. Kings lose in reg or Vegas wins at al and they lock in W2 no matter what.
But you need puck moving defensemen in the 1-3-1 since it forces so many dump ins. And the Kings dmen collectively have an abysmal rate at successful exits bc they struggle to retrieve and move the puck up the ice. Doughty is the only one who's decent at it.They play the 1-3-1 because they don't have the confidence in their offensive players, which makes perfect sense given their desire for two way centers over play makers and stay at home defensemen instead of puck movers.
It might be more successful if they had bigger, more physical wingers and any kind of heart.
Kings have 37RW to Vegas's 34RW. You wouldn't think the Kings had so many RWs, but it's also a reminder of how absolute shit this team was in OT/SO this year.The max points the Kings can finish this season with is 99 (currently at 97)
The Kings had 104 points last season
Considering the PLDufus trade was supposed to put us over the top, can this regular season be considered an abject failure?
Preface- I am a dumbass: but how could the Kings hold a tiebreaker on anyone with the huge number of OTLs?
Wouldn't Vegas have the tiebreaker on regulation wins?
Thank you my friendKings have 37RW to Vegas's 34RW. You wouldn't think the Kings had so many RWs, but it's also a reminder of how absolute shit this team was in OT/SO this year.
W-L would clear up a lot of the complaints especially if they kept the same tiebreakers.Thank you my friend
The NHL really needs to go to a W-L system, ditch the points, and the 3rd year level calculus needed to understand this shit
Which is why they needed to spend more time on getting Clarke ready. If you add Roy’s giveaways to his exit percentages it show why I’d have traded him.But you need puck moving defensemen in the 1-3-1 since it forces so many dump ins. And the Kings dmen collectively have an abysmal rate at successful exits bc they struggle to retrieve and move the puck up the ice. Doughty is the only one who's decent at it.
Successful exit percentiles among Kings dmen:
Doughty: 58%
Anderson: 22%
Gavrikov: 9%
Roy: 7%
Englund: 14%
Spence: 25%
It's no wonder the Kings are so boring to watch. They force a shit ton of dump ins and struggle with breakouts, so they can't generate much going up ice and will spend much of the shift batting the puck around or settling for banking the puck high off the glass and out.
My guess is QB 4th line assignment is more about limiting his minutes so he cant get to his bonuses on G and A
Yep, esp since the 1-3-1 is designed to have the RD as the 1 who typically retrieves.Which is why they needed to spend more time on getting Clarke ready. If you add Roy’s giveaways to his exit percentages it show why I’d have traded him.
Highly unlikely
Seems Blake-ish to blow out the cap w PLD, then try to penny pinch with the rookies. QB is scuffling but hasnt lacked hustle and has been solid with his forecheck and d-zone. While, PLD has been his usually useless self and belongs on the 4th. I dont think its good for QB to have been taken off PP1 where he was effective now demoted to 4th line. Laf is totally offensively impaired no way he's a top line wing.. but for 1 game, maybe they are tanking.Highly unlikely
Nope, a Vancouver win and a Dallas loss means Vancouver would get WC2 (Van owns the tiebreaker)So looks like we're getting Dallas unless we win our last game and Vegas loses in regulation? Is that right?
I still don't agree with that opinion and to be clear it was an opinion not a sourced article sharing information.Re penny pinching bonuses mayor had this article awhile back - worth a read
Are you saying that management doesnt look at the bonus implications when making roster decisions?I still don't agree with that opinion and to be clear it was an opinion not a sourced article sharing information.
Let's get some Jesse opinionsI still don't agree with that opinion and to be clear it was an opinion not a sourced article sharing information.
For some reason I though Vancouver couldn't catch Dallas. Thanks.Nope, a Vancouver win and a Dallas loss means Vancouver would get WC2 (Van owns the tiebreaker)
Dallas gets a point and Dallas gets WC2
A Vancouver lost in regulation or OT and Vancouver gets WC1 (Nashville)
LA still has a chance to play Dallas (as WC2) or Vancouver (as WC2) or Edmonton (as P3),
A Vegas win means LA is WC2 for Dallas or Vancouver,
If Vegas gets 1 point LA needs a win to finish P3 for Edmonton
A Vegas loss then LA needs 1 point or better for P3 and Edmonton
LA will know where they can finish before the game vs Chicago is over (Either Dallas or Vancouver is #1) and if Las Vegas is P3 (with a win) or LA could overtake them.
Scheule
Wed - St Louis @ Dallas 6:30 (Dallas can cinch #1)
Thu - Vancouver @ Winnipeg 5:00 (Van will know if they have a shot at #1)
Thu - Anaheim @ Las Vegas 7:00 (LV knows they can finish P3 with a win or possibly WC2 depending on what LA does)
Thu - Chicago @ Los Angeles 7:30 ( Vegas outcome determines if LA has a chance for P3)
My guess is QB 4th line assignment is more about limiting his minutes so he cant get to his bonuses on G and A
Offseason can’t come soon enoguh
For this year? No. Beyond? Yeah.Does any of this even matter anymore?