bland
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2004
- 8,254
- 12,620
No, you have let an emotional attachment to a player blind you over the course of his career.I'm sure you'll roll it out after saying how much you claim you respect Kopitar's body of work, even though you continue to ignore my underlying point to this day: Kopitar was not the problem. How the team was developed, organized, and structured was.
If the Kings had accumulated other picks, focused on development, and properly rebuilt the team, more success was attainable within 7 years of tbe extension. Because success was attainable within 7 years of drafting him.
But I am glad you will be able to finally celebrate your own delusion that Kopitar's existence on the team was the problem. You've spent the last 17 years being wrong about him, starting with "The Myth of Anze Kopitar" on LGK.
Kopitar's removal from the team won't do shit when management continues to run the team under delusion and inability to execute or adhere to a plan. Once you figure that out, I have an "I told you so" too... because apparently you still haven't.
I don't share the same affection, and I haven't let sentiment prevent me from seeing the truth: Kopitar is not a player you build around. He is an asset, not a focal point. You do not build a franchise around a player who cannot pull from the front, you are setting yourself up for failure.
Kopitar is an outstanding player, a hall of famer, but not a leader. Its no surprise that a team with him as a leader has had such a difficult time overachieving or playing with the kind of emotion needed to rise above challenges. The only success he has seen in his career was when Lombardi correctly realized the weaknesses of his young core and made the right acquisitions to rise above.
He should have been traded in 2015. With the assets Lombardi had to deal to cover for the core's weaknesses - including the ones spent to try for the third - the team was left with almost no cost-controlled assets. Losing Richards, Williams, Mitchell, Scuderi, Stoll, Greene, Regehr and King leave for one lousy 4th round pick combined with the raises and retirement contracts given to the remaining core left the team with no other choice but to rebuild.
But they didn't because they put their faith in players who weren't bad enough to get high picks and not good enough to succeed. It was guaranteed mediocrity. All of this was laid out with plenty of evidence 8 years ago, yet all you seem to care about is the "disrespect" to a player who I have respected plenty.
I don't care for players, I care for the team. It was bad business.