ForeverJerseyGirl
Registered User
On paper the defense isn't overly impressive but I think as a unit it's pretty solid.
Pretty much my thoughts and feelings. If the Devils do a defense by committee kind of thing, they should be fine.
On paper the defense isn't overly impressive but I think as a unit it's pretty solid.
i think the thing with the defensive unit now that NJ is icing, is there are no grenade handlers and they are all pretty mobile. which is much different than some of the previous years. it makes a huge difference in being able to cleanly get out of your own zone, which in turn leads to less times being pinned.
I'm definitely intrigued with Auvitu. I have visions of him being the next Rafalski, who came from the same league at around the same age. I know it's pie in the sky, but hey... one can dream.
Rafalski was like a one in a million find. I'll settle for the next Oduya though.
Don't forget that Rafalski was boosted by his partners in Stevens and Lidstrom, two hall of famers.
I know many will argue that Rafalski was not a great defensive player, I've seen Jim say it more than a few times. I don't think he was a great defensive/shutdown player, but he was a good possession player and could create a lot of offense.Only fools thought that. He was our #1 for a couple years. Man I loved Rafalski though. He was my favorite player mainly because I loved his underdog story and the success he ended up having. I never thought in a million years he would leave us and when he signed with Detroit, I was beyond devastated. I couldn't of cared less that we lost Gomez as well that offseason. I was actually happy that the Rangers were foolish enough to give him that much money in a salary cap era. Losing Rafalski hurt this team a hell of a lot more than losing Gomez. I was happy he had success in Detroit though, going to two Cup Finals and winning one. He retired too young though, he had a few more quality years left in him. I remember hearing that he regretted retiring while still being able to play at a high level. He even tried to make a comeback signing with an ECHL team but by then it was too late. I consider him to be one of our best defenseman in team history. Stevens, Niedermayer, DaneBut yeah I gotta call this insurance company so they can send me one yko, Driver followed by Rafalski and Greene who are close. Might even rank them both over Driver honestly. I could be forgetting someone, but I don't think so.
I know many will argue that Rafalski was not a great defensive player, I've seen Jim say it more than a few times. I don't think he was a great defensive/shutdown player, but he was a good possession player and could create a lot of offense.
Possession and advanced stats were not officially tracked before the 07-08 season, which was Rafalski's first season in Detroit after he left us. But he had amazing corsi and fenwick stats over there, but did get more offensive zone starts than defensive zone starts every year.
I remember his 55 point season in 06-07, his last here. Which was a then career high, which he matched the next season and exceeded with 59 in the season after that in 08-09. I really wanted to keep him after that year that he was a UFA and I believe he wanted to stay, but Lou didn't wanna give him a raise and he was only asking for $500k per year raise or something like that. Not like that almost $2 million per raise that he wound up getting in Detroit. He also was really loyal in 05 during the Niedermayer UFA saga, waiting to re-sign with us until after Nieds made his decision to leave.
The end of the Rafalski era marked the beginning of a 4 or 5 year era and period where we had many grenade handlers and defensive defensemen and very little in the way of puck movers and offensive defensemen. Andy Greene was the only decent one. And then we got Zidlicky almost 5 whole years later. And don't even get me started on signing a 35 year old Rolston a year later, or I'll never shut up about it.
Auvitu is not next Rafalski. He did play well in the Finnish league playoffs last spring but wasn't extraordinary great. Just solid good.
Although the Laine hype kinda got overboard and muffled everything else. He might be Zidlicky-esque, but dont expect much more.
Auvitu was defenseman of the year too.
I don't care. He's going to be the next Rafalski. I'm willing it to be so.
Auvitu was defenseman of the year too.
I don't care. He's going to be the next Rafalski. I'm willing it to be so.
Rafalski was not very good defensively. He had the benefit of playing with Stevens then Niedermayer then Martin then Lidstrom. ...that was his entire career.
The few instances he had to go it on his own he was always exposed.
Just for some perspective when it comes to Rafalski and Auvitus' final year in Finland:
Rafalski- GP 53 G 19 A 34 P 53 +/- +38
Auvitu- GP 48 G 6 A 15 P 21 +/- +22
I'm sure the league has changed in almost 20 years. Scoring is probably down just like it is in the NHL, but man Rafalski had one hell of a season in 98-99.
Actualy, he had 2 seasons where he won best D-man award, as did Sami Vatanen a few years ago (with 42 points in 49 games). Doesn't matter. I'm still making Auvitu the next Rafalski by my sheer force of will and a couple good luck charms.