Kyle Connor vs Mikko Rantanen

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates

Hu


  • Total voters
    96
Yeah this is an AINEC situation. No disrespect to Connor either but Rantanen has a solid chance of becoming a HHOFer by the time his career ends, if he has 1 or 2 more high end seasons in Carolina its basically set in stone. Will likely go down as a top 4 Finnish forward in NHL history too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SillyRabbit
Last 3 years:

Rantanen 122 goals, 273 points, +47, 1.29 PPG (~106 points per 82 games)
Connor 91 goals, 201 points, -16, 1.02 ppg (~84 points per 82 games)

Playoffs last 3 years:

Rantanen 16 goals, 49 points, +6, 1.29 ppg (~106 points per 82 games)
Connor 9 points in 10 games. .90 ppg (~74 points over 82 games)

The only way Connor should have any votes is if people mistake the poll option for Connor McDavid.
 
Rantanen is definitely better as a jets fan but it’ll be interesting to see how much Rantanens points drop off without MacKinnon and Makar
 
I consider Rantanen the better player, but I don't think it's AINEC because Connor constantly leads the Jets in offense, versus Rantanen clearly benefitting offensively from MacKinnon, Makar, and even Landeskog in the past. Now Rantanen is overall more dynamic, but I don't think Rantanen is an entirely different league.
 
Connor is more of a team player which is more valuable.

Rantanen strikes me as he just wants cash and doesn't care about winning because he has a cup already.

Career playoff numbers:

Rantanen 34 goals, 102 point pace over 82 games + 20
Connor 27 goals, 58 point pace over 82 games, -13

I agree that one of those 2 players plays like he doesn't care about a cup.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad