Can you disprove it, especially when it comes to Kucherov?
Argumentum ad ignorantiam
Mark Zuckerberg is an alien because no one can prove that he isn't.
Can you disprove it, especially when it comes to Kucherov?
Argumentum ad ignorantiam
Mark Zuckerberg is an alien because no one can prove that he isn't.
sorta funny. i dont disagree. Its way more of a bitch move, for sure..... i think i might actually hate the elbow to Johanssen the most. Just totally uncalled for and possibly even the most damaging of the three.Call me crazy but I find something like this worse than McDavids crosscheck.
exactly . ecspecially when mcdavid was in complete control of a precission hit to the helmet . he knew exactly what he was doing and that he wouldnt hit the face but rather just the helmet without injurying . a totally justified move in my book caused by carpland playing punk clutch n grab hockey which seriously detracts from nhl excitment .Call me crazy but I find something like this worse than McDavids crosscheck.
are we really out here saying this is worse than mcdavid giving garland a whole new face?
Call me crazy but I find something like this worse than McDavids crosscheck.
He has 73 points, dude. He deserves the benefit of the doubt and you know that.Who is still giving kucherov the benefit of the doubt?
He's a prick.
Yep. Kucherov has always been a dirty player.Typical Kucherov
Why would his point total have anything to do with giving him the benefit of the doubt over a dirty play?He has 73 points, dude. He deserves the benefit of the doubt and you know that.
If Kucherov has been spending the night, you can bet your sweet ass that that's EXACTLY what I'm doing!Do you walk out of your house every morning with a cup on in the off chance a rabid wolverine latches onto your genitals? Gotta be ready for anything. It's a crazy world out there.
Which is one decision of many he could have made, brace harder, skate faster, skate slower, deke, initiate contact, shoot it earlier, etc etc.
Can he telepathically be ready for exactly that from kuch, obviously not. Does he have more options than gliding to the net trying to protect the puck, yes, obviously.
That is all. Not taking anything away from a dirty play so dont @ me in your fake internet outrage over minutiae.
It’s obviously a dirty play, but what I’m saying is a lot of people will look the other way when he’s scoring at this type of rateYep. Kucherov has always been a dirty player.
Why would his point total have anything to do with giving him the benefit of the doubt over a dirty play?