Enniskillen
Registered User
- Jan 16, 2021
- 1,066
- 1,650
Kuch is a duche but why nobody on the wings team fought him or at least tried to? And all these pro-Russian trolls sound like Solovyev propaganda lol
Ok ignoring the potential injury possibility, was it a dirty play in your opinion?That again is wrong logic.
Discussion of virtual cases "what if" is pointless.Ok ignoring the potential injury possibility, was it a dirty play in your opinion?
Sure, I'm just wondering if you think it was a dirty play or not. Everyone is entitled to their opinion so I'm not going to attack you for whatever it is haha. Just curious as to your thoughts on if it was a dirty play or not.Discussion of virtual cases "what if" is pointless.
Imagine if a meteor came and hit the rink.These kind of plays can lead to season, or even career ending injury.
Imagine Rasmussen going full speed to boards or hitting the post.
f*** Kucherov, dirty POS.
Which do you think is more likely?Imagine if a meteor came and hit the rink.
If I were afraid of someone attacked my opinion I would not be on the main boards.Sure, I'm just wondering if you think it was a dirty play or not. Everyone is entitled to their opinion so I'm not going to attack you for whatever it is haha. Just curious as to your thoughts on if it was a dirty play or not.
Well there has been an increase in Starlink satellites falling so if you count those...Which do you think is more likely?
Fair enough. I think it was dirty just based on the situation-on a breakaway with empty net=automatic goal if you're tripped, puck looked like it was going in already when he made contact with his skates and it looks like he's not actually making any attempt to play the puck, just to hack at Rasmussen's ankles. Based on that I'd say it's pretty dirty. I doubt he'll get suspended as idk if anyone has been suspended for a trip before but nhl dops is always random AF.If I were afraid of someone attacked my opinion I would not be on the main boards.
While everyone is indeed entitled to the opinion and nothing wrong with that, it is everything wrong with the attempts to say something like this:
1) Kucherov tripped the player after the goal
2) That could have been an injury, therefore it is dirty
3) Tripping is somehow always attempt to injure and always dirty
4) Mind reading Kucherov's intent to injure
etc.
These examples are not opinions. They are just emotional dumb hot takes.
An attempt to stop a player without a penalty often results in a penalty. It does not mean that the players should stop trying just because there is high risk of a penalty and give the other team a free pass.The argument of taking a penalty to prevent a goal falls on its face once you understand that a goal would have been awarded anyway since it was an empty net and he tripped him from behind on a breakaway.
Either state an opinion of Kucherov's actions or concede the opinion of others.If I were afraid of someone attacked my opinion I would not be on the main boards.
While everyone is indeed entitled to the opinion and nothing wrong with that, it is everything wrong with the attempts to say something like this:
1) Kucherov tripped the player after the goal
2) That could have been an injury, therefore it is dirty
3) Tripping is somehow always attempt to injure and always dirty
4) Mind reading Kucherov's intent to injure
5) Kucherov always tries to injure other players,
etc.
These examples are not opinions. They are just emotional dumb hot takes.
The play had passed the point of 'trying'. The puck was in. There was nothing left for Kucherov to do. His actions served absolutely no purpose, other than to act out a tantrum.An attempt to stop a player without a penalty often results in a penalty. It does not mean that the players should stop the trying just because there is high risk of a penalty and give the other team a free pass.
Thanks for info. I would tell that to anyone who will try to audit my opinion.You're not here to audit opinions.
Care to explain how Kucherov was attempting not to take a penalty while also taking out another player’s feet from under them?An attempt to stop a player without a penalty often results in a penalty. It does not mean that the players should stop trying just because there is high risk of a penalty and give the other team a free pass.
That is your opinion.The play had passed the point of 'trying'. The puck was in. There was nothing left for Kucherov to do. His actions served absolutely no purpose, other than to act out a tantrum.
The trajectory of the puck is not an opinion.That is your opinion.
And my opinion is that he played the episode till the end and it resulted in the tripping.
And btw mindreading does not exist.
Do I really need to make 3 video compilation ofCare to explain how Kucherov was attempting not to take a penalty while also taking out another player’s feet from under them?
Wait until you find out how bad a concussion is…Yes, this is infinitely more dangerous than what mcdavid did
Imagine worst case scenario in both cases:
Broken nose/teeth possibly jaw vs destroyed knee/ankle broken leg
Only one of those could end a career
You ignored what I said.Do I really need to make 3 video compilation of
1) players failing to stop the opposite players with the puck and getting penalties for breaking rules
2) players successfully disrupting enough the opposite players with the puck w/o taking penalties
2) players successfully stopping the opposite players with the puck and getting away with breaking the rules while doing it?
So all of them are dirty because they all Kucherov?
Not score but pass the puck to Kuch.What do you want him to do there?