I think "larger than life" was your view as a kid that changed as you grew older (that's my take).
Otherwise for a number of years I'd skip watching the even altogether because of its complete lack of competitive edge that defines hockey as a sport in general. I'm with @Maximus on his take that the switch to the divisional elimination format, prize money and 3-on-3 format got me back into watching the event. TBH, 3-on-3 seems perfect because it's all about skills and speed (as opposed to physicality and tenaciousness) by its nature, so I can buy into ("believing") it as opposed to when 5 hockey players would just stand around and wait for a opponent player with possession to "Putin" his way to a goal.
Just can't care about this anymore. I liked the Young Stars thing, and the skills comp. Do that in one evening and I'm good. And just name the All Stars, but don't have a stupid game. The games are so saccharine and meaningless.
Agreed. I mean even fans want everything to be serious all the time lol. It’s cool just to have a fun gameI like to be sentimental and think that the ASG is the one time during the season where everyone sets aside their teams' beefs with each other and hang out for a day
.
Yeah, IDK, I just remember when it seemed like the players really cared, and didn't like each other despite it being an exhibition. I like beefs--hard feelings and the actions that come of them are what makes the game great, IMO. I don't like setting them aside.I like to be sentimental and think that the ASG is the one time during the season where everyone sets aside their teams' beefs with each other and hang out for a day.
You saying ‘friendly pond hockey’ gave me this idea: put a fan on each team and let the pros bank pucks in off of themYeah, IDK, I just remember when it seemed like the players really cared, and didn't like each other despite it being an exhibition. I like beefs--hard feelings and the actions that come of them are what makes the game great, IMO. I don't like setting them aside.
Now it's just like a friendly pond hockey game. Which, sure, can be entertaining to watch, but doesn't make me actually want to tune in. Hockey without any passion or emotion is, IDK, not hockey to me.
To clarify: these are just my personal feelings and in no way do I think this is how everyone should feel. Honestly it's good for people to care, as it's good exposure for the league.
I'm closer to 20 than 30growing up with the internet & services where I can watch every Rangers game even though I don't live near NY; and being in a huge hockey market in Vancouver I guess I never experienced the anticipation of seeing those star players that you'd rarely get to see back then. So maybe that's why there was such an allure to it in a lot of people on here's younger days where it's worn off now because with the internet they can see every star player on demand at the click of a button
But yes, there will always be contingents on here that have good aspects and not so good aspects. You've got the logic crowd, the analytics crowd, the hot takes/reactionary crowd, the crowd that wants to trade everyone for picks, the crowd that loves reclamation projects, the posters who prefer European players, the ones who prefer North American prospects, the anti-establishment crowd, the coach-focused crowd, the trade proposal crowd, jaded crowd, the rose colored glasses crowd, and probably a dozen more different groups.
And people belong to more than one group, at different times, and there's movement between those groups, and tendencies, and yada, yada, yada.
You kind of just learn to surf between the various waves.
This post should be the welcome post to HF hoards.
ok boomer.Honestly, I'm not gonna keep debating the same crap. It's always about asset management, extracting maximum value, blah blah blah. People here couldn't build a hockey team if their life depended on it. I get this place is called "Hockey Futures" but people here are lame. They can't even enjoy a season because all they care about is the next draft and this pipe dream of building this perfect team. Hockey fans are weird, I've never seen a group so infatuated with 17 and 18 year old kids. Kinda creepy.
It's weird because he's one of those guys for whom a very clear number jumps to mind - 28 goals and around 53 points. It's like he hits goal plateaus and that's where he stays.
He hit the 21 goal/45 point production level (if not the milestone itself) in 2013-14, and then he stayed there for two more years.
Then he jumped up to 28 goals in 2016-17, and has stayed at that level since.
It feels like there are very clearly defined benchmarks for Kreider.
I always watch the skills competition but I haven't watched one of the games since I was a kid. I'll catch up on highlights or whatever but I can't waste my time on the garbage game itself.Just can't care about this anymore. I liked the Young Stars thing, and the skills comp. Do that in one evening and I'm good. And just name the All Stars, but don't have a stupid game. The games are so saccharine and meaningless.
I always watch the skills competition but I haven't watched one of the games since I was a kid. I'll catch up on highlights or whatever but I can't waste my time on the garbage game itself.
Imagine if the Rangers got a great offer for Kreider before the allstar weekend lmfao
Mika probably has extensive family plans in both Sweden and Iran. Tony spending his week making America great again. CK is a good choice for the league. Kreids has more name recognition than Mika.