Oil4life99
Registered User
- Oct 5, 2017
- 41
- 22
No way in hell you were signing him for 5 years that would have been a low ball offer. 6 years would have been the bestMy heart is happy to have him back, but my head is unhappy with the terms.
The AAV is spot on. The duration is two years too long.
Let's see what the NM provisions are...
There is no caving. It is called a compromise. He came down in dollars and the team went up in years.
Ya it’s dumb. And this isn’t some mega contract that’s completely immoveable. If he sucks in those years, it won’t be that hard to deal with. 6.5M aav in 5 years will be nothing.Is there some data to show that there's a huge drop off in play between age 35 and 36? I don't understand why everyone was fine with 6 years but is going crazy with 7.
Rebuild is officially over.
No because when he starts his decline in year 2-3 at least we could have said, Oh it's ok, we only have 2 more years, now we will be stuck with 4.Is there some data to show that there's a huge drop off in play between age 35 and 36? I don't understand why everyone was fine with 6 years but is going crazy with 7.