Fifty#15
Registered User
- Jun 3, 2007
- 2
- 0
As a Canucks fan, When Columbus came to Vancouver, Klesla played 5 1/2 more minutes than kraijcek did, and kraijcek got +2 and 1 assist. He played very well that game
I'm a Canucks fan but I'd still take Klesla.
Klesla anyday.
I shudder whenever I see Krajicek on the ice.
Klesla anyday.
I shudder whenever I see Krajicek on the ice.
I dont argue with you taking Klesla. However as the playoffs went on Krajicek played real real good hockey. Infact the best hockey of his career was playing during the playoffs this year. He looked so confident with the puck.
uh? Krajicek was fantastic most of the season, went through a month where he wasn't very good, but recovered and was great again in both playoff series.
He was solid in the playoffs, I'll give you that, he really showed off his excellent skating ability and passing talent, but let's not kid ourselves. He was very average in the regular season, and for a guy who got power play time like he did, he should have put up a lot more points, especially when you look at the fact that he was supposedly an offensive defenseman.
why? He isn't an offensive defenseman and he has a weak shot. Krajicek is fundamentally solid defensively, is a great skater, and has a very good outlet pass. He will never put up huge totals offensively. He was definitely not "very average." From October to early December, he was very good. He struggled for most of January, but found his game again down the stretch. He stepped up even further in the playoffs with our injuries to the top-four. I don't think I'd take him over Klesla, but he is getting the short end in this thread.