Sure. Crying more about bottoming out in all the wrong yearsTkachuk you're crying about
Sure. Crying more about bottoming out in all the wrong yearsTkachuk you're crying about
It will take a bit more than a 5 point night to cry about no kotkaniemi
Kotkaniemi>Suzuki
Weren't you the guy who guaranteed the Habs would draft Wright? Lol.
Kotkaniemi has 23 points in his last 30 games.
Suzuki has 17 points in his last 30 games.
Original comment. Maybe read through the thread before posting. Salty Habs fan or just having a bad day?Sammy snowpants once scored 8 in a game against the dynasty ‘Hawks
oh boy. they all said that.Weren't you the guy who guaranteed the Habs would draft Wright? Lol.
KK is better than Suzuki, I guess you are right.Weren't you the guy who guaranteed the Habs would draft Wright? Lol.
Kotkaniemi has 23 points in his last 30 games.
Suzuki has 17 points in his last 30 games.
Has Jay Woodcroft avatar and makes comment about Sam Gagner.Original comment. Maybe read through the thread before posting. Salty Habs fan or just having a bad day?
Did I say that?KK is better than Suzuki, I guess you are right.
He's #3C, with #2 C upside. Most Habs fans thought that and still think that. I don't buy the 5 pts game hype nor did I buy the 4 points in 25 games at the beginning of the season.Did I say that?
Perhaps I'm just illustrating that he's a better player than a lot of people thought (especially Habs fans).
Habs fans crying - no Tkachuk or Kotkaniemi
You're the only one in this thread who keeps bringing up Tkachuk. I know being an Ottawa fan you're used to try to be relevant but this one is not about you.Tkachuk you're crying about
I think that even you'll admit that the premise of the thread is flawed. He may well be better than people thought, but framing one game as definitive evidence isn't the way to go. It could have been a congratulatory thread for a solid achievement, but instead it's...this.Did I say that?
Perhaps I'm just illustrating that he's a better player than a lot of people thought (especially Habs fans).
He's been producing like a 2C for the last 40 games. And he's currently playing 2C on the second best team in the league.He's #3C, with #2 C upside. Most Habs fans thought that and still think that. I don't buy the 5 pts game hype nor did I buy the 4 points in 25 games at the beginning of the season.
Good for him if he starts producing.
Definitive evidence?I think that even you'll admit that the premise of the thread is flawed. He may well be better than people thought, but framing one game as definitive evidence isn't the way to go. It could have been a congratulatory thread for a solid achievement, but instead it's...this.
His play for Canes has looked good, and his point totals also would look better if it wasn’t for Teräväinen struggling whole season till recently and Svechnikov having his goal drought.
Just admit you like to try to trigger Habs fans, if not you would not have started your post that way.He's been producing like a 2C for the last 40 games. And he's currently playing 2C on the second best team in the league.
Definitive evidence?
I said "I guess he's better than people thought"...
Why would Habs fans be triggered by Kotkaniemi playing well?Just admit you like to try to trigger Habs fans, if not you would not have started your post that way.
Obvious troll is obvious.
Anyways, good for KK if he becomes a top 6 NHL player.
Why would Habs fans be triggered by Kotkaniemi playing well?
Sounds like someone needs to grow up.
Without getting to far into a Clintonian "it depends what your definition of 'is' is" discussion, your OP uses a single game to make a declarative statement about his overall performance.Definitive evidence?
I said "I guess he's not as bad as people thought"...
He's been producing like a 2C for the last 40 games. And he's currently playing 2C on the second best team in the league.
He hasn’t even joined the team yet. Has a visa appointment in Ottawa tomorrow to get that sorted and will play in Montreal Tuesday. Should hopefully be able to travel with the team after that.He was scratched today, but he still had as many points as the entire Lightning roster. So, he wasn't the worst today.
I agree with your premise that he’s a better player than some folks want to give him credit for, but let’s be honest here… he’s a 2C in the same sense that Travis Boyd is a 1C. His actual level of play would have him on the 3rd line of most teams.
The Canes’ lineup conundrum is that they have the ultimate 3C prototype in Jordan Staal, and a gaping hole at 2C because they refused to overpay Trocheck. Along comes Kotkaniemi… you can’t play him at 3C because promoting Staal is asking for trouble, so by default he lands on the 2nd line with wingers who play above his head. What’s more, he gets a fair amount of PP time — up till now, he was part of a really bad 2nd unit, but Gostisbehere at QB seems to have made a huge difference there. So he’s overslotted, but picking up points appropriate to that slot.
What’s interesting is that out of all this, Kotkaniemi has shown signs of developing into a nice utility player or “glue guy”. He facilitates his line without driving it, which is the next best thing to being a bona fide 2C. At his age, he has a chance to keep learning the art of defensive hockey and replace Staal as a PK fixture, and he’s projecting to be a similar 2C/3C tweener in his prime.