I would expect you to disagree, Patrice, but it isn't purely the numbers, either. Kopitar hasn't had the supporting cast that you did for long stretches, either.
Bergeron already had two 70 point seasons before Marchand was even in the league.
I would expect you to disagree, Patrice, but it isn't purely the numbers, either. Kopitar hasn't had the supporting cast that you did for long stretches, either.
Kopitar was better offensively, while on par defensively. 2 cups > 1 cup. He also may be able to win another Selke.
The same way Bergeron had to deal with Datsyuk when it came to the Selke, Kopitar had to deal with Bergeron.
The way I see it, there isn't a defensive gap between them
You’re correct..The result shows you’re wrong
In regards to number 2, correct. It was not needed what I said1. Calm down.
2. Classless? If anything you disrespected Kopitar more than anyone here disrespected Bergeron with your comment that the poll should be closed because it wouldn’t be a contest.
3. Na na na na na na Kopitar is better.
I think Kopitar was a bit better. Don't care about the Selkes, Bergeron was the better defensive player and that's obvious...
For me it is Kopitar. He's better offensively more than Bergeron is better defensively and Kopitar has been -the man- in LA for so long through thick and thin. An absolute stud in LAs two Cup wins.
Yeah. It's no slight to Kopitar, very good defensive player.Is it?
Kopitar's defensive playoff stats are off the charts. Like, friggin excellent.
LOL at the ppl who think bergeron is better. once again east coast fans know nothing about hockey.
Wrong Slov...Kopitar is bigger and more talented than Bergeron. I get Bergeron is the better pure defender but that doesn’t make up the gap for me. Kopi has been underrated for so long because he’s a Slovak playing in LA vs a Canadian in Boston
Kopitar was better offensively, while on par defensively. 2 cups > 1 cup. He also may be able to win another Selke.
The same way Bergeron had to deal with Datsyuk when it came to the Selke, Kopitar had to deal with Bergeron.
The way I see it, there isn't a defensive gap between them, but there is a visible offensive gap. Not a significant gap, but definitely a difference.
Defence - Bergeron 10/10
Defence - Kopitar 10/10
Offence - Bergeron 8/10
Offence - Kopitar 9/10
1) the notion of having them switch places and this is what you’ll see comments happen all the time and they are made as if fact. What is a fact is that you have no idea what would happen, maybe both end up being worse, no one really knows and we know is what each actually did.Put Kopitar in Boston and Bergeron in LA over their entire careers. I have zero doubt Kopitar has more Selkes and has an even larger lead in total points playing the with the wingers and 1st power play unit the Bruins have been able to roll out in the past 7+ years when Bergeron went from 2-2.5 pts/60 to 3 pts/60. Bergeron is a first-ballot HHOFer, but Kopitar’s size and natural tools are just a slight step above. Totally here for an argument that Bergeron had a better career even if I disagree, but I strongly feel Kopitar’s output and playoff performances point to him being the better player by a small margin.
I think another way to look at this is in his absolute best years, I think you could’ve said Kopitar was a top 3 center. There was Sid, and then you could’ve argued him head-to-head versus anyone else in the league. He had a strong case for the Hart the year Hall won, and similarly for the Conn Smythe in 2014.
Didn’t or hasn’t turned out as you expected so far….looks to be pretty even splitDefinitely Bergeron on both accounts.
Think of a new poll, because this ones ending fast
There must be some sort of confusion with how OP worded the question and gave 4 option when he should have gave 21) the notion of having them switch places and this is what you’ll see comments happen all the time and they are made as if fact. What is a fact is that you have no idea what would happen, maybe both end up being worse, no one really knows and we know is what each actually did.
2) you are clearly biased. Not an accusation, just a fact. Everyone has biases it’s just the way it goes…in this case, you are biased in Kopitars favour. I voted Bergeron for both and was going to say I’m not biased due to not being a fan or hater of either team or player, but perhaps I’m biased a bit due to recency with another Selke win and retirement. What I can say is there is not a ton of separation between the two.
Didn’t or hasn’t turned out as you expected so far….looks to be pretty even split
We're ranking overall careers, no? Maybe at his best Kopitar was quite good defensively, but for career:
Bergeron has 6 Selkes, 12 straight top 3 finishes and 14x in the top 5
Kopitar has 2 Selkes, 5x top 5, 6x top 5
Without digging too deep into defensive stats - this seems like a pretty big defensive edge to Bergeron. Unless you think Kopitar didn't get enough selke recognition, or that Bergeron's was unwarranted.
I agree on Kopitar having an edge offensively.
It's a good thing Kopitar doesn't have to hit 90+ regularly to be significantly stronger offensively than Bergeron.Kopitar's offense is a little overrated because of his amazing season in 2017-2018, but he never really hit those numbers on a consistent basis.
Imagine if Kopitar was born in Ontario and played his entire career in the East ?If Kopitar played in the East he would be winning this by a landslide
I don't disagree with that, but the gap between his defensive ability and Kopitar's is very minimal. Whereas the offensive gap is visible.I don't see how that makes sense. Bergeron has been the clear #1 defensive center of his generation. Traditional stats, advanced metrics, voting, trophy wins backs that up. Kopitar has had some down years in his own end while Bergeron has been excellent for an unprecedented number of years in a row.