Vukotal Recall
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2010
- 1,368
- 3,424
If I had a time machine, I would leave killing Hitler to the next guy with a time machine and go back and pick Kopitar over Carey Price.
There are fair arguments for Doughty. To me, Kopitar has the edge because:asking as a non-kings fan: what makes doughty not a greater king than kopitar?
from my eyes, doughty was both the better player overall and the more important player those cup teams. and kopi had a two year head start, but in the end doughty might be around just as long.
Kopitar made Thornton and Getzlaf his bitch in the 2014 playoffs. Tavares and Giroux were literally never better than Kopitar unless you only watch east coast games. Stamkos is debatable but it depends on what type of player you value more.No.
I mean. You could argue that, but it'd be wrong.
Getzlaf, Stamkos, Tavares, Giroux and Thornton were all better in those years.
Kopitar was a great player though. It's kind of weird how his individual success like Kane seemed to come after the cup years.
No they were phucken not, even Wayne Gretzky had Anze as a top 3 player! Not center but player.. so wtf are you talking aboutNo.
I mean. You could argue that, but it'd be wrong.
Getzlaf, Stamkos, Tavares, Giroux and Thornton were all better in those years.
Kopitar was a great player though. It's kind of weird how his individual success like Kane seemed to come after the cup years.
Kopitar made Thornton and Getzlaf his bitch in the 2014 playoffs. Tavares and Giroux were literally never better than Kopitar unless you only watch east coast games. Stamkos is debatable but it depends on what type of player you value more.
No they were phucken not, even Wayne Gretzky had Anze as a top 3 player! Not center but player.. so wtf are you talking about
getzlaf had 8 pts in 7 games in that series. thornton yeah, he only put up 3 pts in 7 games and all 3 of those pts came in the first 3 games. he did nothing after game 3Kopitar made Thornton and Getzlaf his bitch in the 2014 playoffs. Tavares and Giroux were literally never better than Kopitar unless you only watch east coast games. Stamkos is debatable but it depends on what type of player you value more.
It wasn’t a match up that the Ducks were fond of, if I recall correctly the Getzlaf line played against the Richards’ line the most.getzlaf had 8 pts in 7 games in that series. thornton yeah, he only put up 3 pts in 7 games and all 3 of those pts came in the first 3 games. he did nothing after game 3
Getzlaf was also a -5 in the series while Kopitar was +5 with 9 points. In fact, Kopitar was the favorite to win the Conn Smythe after round 2 before he and Toews canceled each other out in the Conference Final. I agree that Getzlaf was better than Thornton though.getzlaf had 8 pts in 7 games in that series. thornton yeah, he only put up 3 pts in 7 games and all 3 of those pts came in the first 3 games. he did nothing after game 3
Yes but we already know that players playing in the east have a voting advantage when it comes to awards. Neither of those two are locks for the HOF while Kopitar is.Went to Kings games regularly from 2006 - 2015. Tavares had a Hart finalist finish in 2013 and 2015.
Kopi had one finish in the years of 2012-2014 and it was 8th.
Didn't finish top 10 in scoring until 17-18.
Overrating him.
Tavares was top 10 in 11-12 and 2nd in 14-15.
Giroux was 3rd in scoring in 11-12 and 13-14 and Hart finalist in 13-14.
Been a Kings fan since the 80's, It's Kopitar for me.
Dude has been a rock his entire career. Great defence, good offense, amazing durability. He'll end up 3rd all time in goals, first all time in assists (probably in the next couple days) and it would surprise me if he doesn't finish as the franchise all time leading scorer. Already all time games played leader (though Doughty could eventually pass him conceivably). Others have been more talented, sure, but Kopi will go down as the greatest.
Yes but we already know that players playing in the east have a voting advantage when it comes to awards. Neither of those two are locks for the HOF while Kopitar is.
I honestly feel like Gretzky should be in his own separate category. His importance transcended the Kings and was the face of the sport while growing the game in the south. It’s hard to compare that to guys who just played hockey.Would you say Kopitar, Gretzky then Dionne as the top 3 Kings? Or do you have another preference.
We’re talking about the same thing. There were many people who considered Kopitar to be one of the top players back then and he’s always been labeled as underrated. I don’t personally know how high I’d rank him but I always felt he was better than those guys.Are we talking careers or the period which I was quoted in saying Kopitar wasn’t a top 3 center or 2B to Malkin?
Because if your argument is Kopitar had a better career than Giroux or Tavares, I probably agree. But the post you originally quoted was about someone saying Kopitar was a top 3 forward from 11-12 to 13-14 which is simply not true.
I’m sure many people will have kittens for me saying this but Brown is second IMO. I’d even put Dave Taylor and Robitaille ahead of Gretzky when classifying “greatest King”. And that’s the problem with these types of threads, nobody can agree on the definition of the term.Would you say Kopitar, Gretzky then Dionne as the top 3 Kings? Or do you have another preference.
When people start these threads my guess is they never watched Dionne, Gretzky, or Luc Robitaille play.