Surprised its been nearly unanimous for Kopi bring the greatest King of all time. Is there really no argument between him and Doughty for greatest King of all time?
Kopitar has seemingly aged better since Doughty has barely received Norris votes since 2018- present day.
But Doughty was top 3 in his position for 4 years and arguably more, being a Norris finalist 4 times in his career and from 2009-2017 was basically at least a top 10 defenseman.
I don't think you can say the same for Kopitar. Particularly being top 3 in his position except for the one time he was a Hart finalist.
I mean, there is an argument for everything on a message board, but at the same time, I will say that an argument can be made for any of the players mentioned because all of their names are or will be in the rafters pretty soon. Brown, Kopitar, Doughty, and Quick are all going to be hanging at Crypto Areno when all is said and done along with the rest of the Kings greats. I actually like that Doughty is getting some appreciation in this thread as he is usually the one most whipped outside of Dustin Brown.
All four were important and core to the organization during their success, but I think only Quick would have an argument to being close to Kopitar's importance, and that was mainly in 2012. Kopitar has been vital and relevant since he put on the uniform. After he dominated his first NHL game he never stopped, he has always had the team on his back ever since, his consistency is absolutely revered at this point in LA.
I think there are legit arguments for Gretzky, Dionne, Lucky Luc, and Kopi for greatest King of all time.
I don't think the two cup wins should immediately catapult Kopitar to the top considering at various times during those cup wins Quick, Williams, Doughty, Richards, and Gaborik were as, if not more, vital to their success. (Don't say this to disparage him, he's a brilliant player and obviously a monumental part of those wins. They don't win without him).
There's definitely a legitimate argument for any of them as their names are all in the rafters, but Kopitar is slightly unlike any of them as he was the foundation of the franchise since the moment he dawned the sweater and has carried the team ever since without falter through to the most success the franchise has ever seen. His career has been so perfect, complete, and he is so beloved on and off the ice throughout the franchise and league that it is hard to argue against him in terms of what he means to LA. Before him, it was an argument between Gretzky, Luc, and Dionne, but after him I would say that all of those were greats and the best at various things for the franchise, but none had the complete package and career Kopitar did.
It's Dionne at No. 1 and then it's Gretzky at No. 2. Then it's probably Kopitar, a hair in front of Robitaille.
He's the best that the current generation will have watched in person, though. That kind of thing really does matter. Comparing the people you know to the people you only know of is kind of comparing apples and oranges. I'm not sure we should do it as readily as we do.
I mean, you're not wrong in that those are the best players ever to play for the franchise, and sure opinions will vary and it should be taken into consideration if you are only polling people who have seen the current team and not the Gretzky/Dionne eras. The Kings have been around for a long time being an original/first expansion team. The fanbase is pretty varied in age and has a lot of older fans who remember the play of every/most Kings greats. Robitaille is my favorite King of all time, but when we are talking about the greatest King of all time we are not talking about who is the most talented or who we like the most, but who had the greatest impact on the franchise, fanbase, and community.
Kopitar is just the complete package, a lot of those greats will check most boxes which is why their names hang above, but Kopitar checks every single one. He was the best player on the team every single year he played, played the most games as a King, and has been with the team the longest over everyone, has been the most consistent and reliable in terms of production and coming in clutch when he is needed every time, has been active in the community and is heralded as one of the nicest players in the franchise and league, has been a leader and captain to the team for many years now, played the most important role overall but especially during the team's successful cup winning runs, etc. The list can go on and on but it would be hard to find a box that Kopitar couldn't check where it is relatively easy for any other player mentioned.
Ultimately, being that complete package and bringing success to a franchise that was starved for it for so long is just going to win you pinnacle admiration from the fanbase, community, and league as a whole. I can't see any argument against him other than people saying that he wasn't the most talented player ever to play for the organization which isn't what Kings fans are mainly considering when choosing their greatest and most beloved player.
With all due respect to Dustin Brown, when the organization was considering erecting a statue outside the arena, did anyone think about holding off instead for a future Kopitar statue? I know Brown was a great captain, but it seems like a universal sentiment that Kopitar was a better career King player.
Not really. Nobody outside of LA will understand Dustin Brown's impact on the organization, I think most Kings fans understand that after he was honored from other fanbase reactions. In the end, all four of Kopitar, Quick, Doughty, and Brown are going to have their numbers retired and statues made. That was a promise of AEG Tim Lewieke when the Kings won their first cup. Because every single King that gets their number retired gets one then there is no reason to slight Brown and wait for the others. Brown was the heart and soul of the team throughout his career and their cup wins, the most beloved captain/leader, and the longest-tenured King at the time.