I had to laugh at twitter and facebook already calling for Waddell to be removed because he's going to run off all of our young players by only giving them bridge deals when we need to start locking down our kids like Marchenko with a 5x5Marchenko is a 24 year old winger who has been a 20 goals scorer on a very bad hockey team. It's really hard to determine upside on this guy. He may have topped out already. Who knows.
Signing him long term (or any other younger player) would be a fools errand at this point, The CBJ long term contract situation is already rife with poor long term big money contracts. Waddell is using proper risk management given the overall payroll structure of the team and its poor performance.
This is not a roster to which one wants to get married.
Highly unlikely imo. People who have doubts about his offensive upside should watch the video that was already posted here. It isn't just a goal montage, it also contains a lot of assist plays and almost goals where he shows off his playmaking and 1v1 skills.Marchenko is a 24 year old winger who has been a 20 goals scorer on a very bad hockey team. It's really hard to determine upside on this guy. He may have topped out already. Who knows.
Highly unlikely imo. People who have doubts about his offensive upside should watch the video that was already posted here. It isn't just a goal montage, it also contains a lot of assist plays and almost goals where he shows off his playmaking and 1v1 skills.
I'd much rather have him on a long-term deal than Monahan or Sillinger.
So CBJ can take two year deal from arbitration and still have RFA, good.
Highly unlikely imo. People who have doubts about his offensive upside should watch the video that was already posted here. It isn't just a goal montage, it also contains a lot of assist plays and almost goals where he shows off his playmaking and 1v1 skills.
I'd much rather have him on a long-term deal than Monahan or Sillinger.
He's a decent player. He skates well and is pretty shifty with the puck at times. Potential 30 goals scorer. He doesn't impress me as a good playmaker-average to slightly below average- would be my assessment. His physical play is lacking.
In any case, he's got 3 years to go until he's a UFA. He's not going to be a PPG guy more than likely. I don't see the CBJ getting a potential discount on his contract that's worth the risk of going long term.
What risk? He is already almost a 25-25-50 guy with just two years of NHL experience. I would think 5x5 for a 24 year old with that offensive production is the going rate.I think a 5x5 for him is perfect, there's risk on both sides.
Maybe he becomes worth more than that and he's selling himself short but he'll set himself up to get paid on his next deal.
We take the risk of overpaying him if he doesn't live up to expectations.
Anytime you sign a long term deal, there's a risk.. especially for a young kid with a new coach, system and upper management in place. He could get paid and suddenly be content as he's "made it" and got his guaranteed money. It wouldn't be the first time it's happened and it certainly wouldn't be the lastWhat risk? He is already almost a 25-25-50 guy with just two years of NHL experience. I would think 5x5 for a 24 year old with that offensive production is the going rate.
This just furthers my case. There's risk on both sides.The Wadster was on local radio. Sounds like a 2 year deal. He said a longer term deal usually turns out bad for one side so 2 years makes sense.
The bigger risk from Jackets perspective might be that by the time they're ready to compete there won't be a single core player on a long team friendly contract to avoid cap issues.CBJ risks Marchenko stalling in his progression and never becoming more than a 40 pt player.
I don't think they can because the argument against locking him up then will be "he would be too expensive for just an okay 60pt winger so let's trade him for a real hockey player like tall center or right-handed defenseman".If he winds up with a two year deal he'll be 26 when he'll be eligible for an 8 yr deal locking him up for his career. Jackets can open the checkbook then if he becomes a 60+ pt per season guy by then.
We're talking 2 years from now. Laine will be gone along with his cap hit. Elvis more than likely. Chinny will be re-signed or gone by then. Your cap problems are way overblown imo.The bigger risk from Jackets perspective might be that by the time they're ready to compete there won't be a single core player on a long team friendly contract to avoid cap issues.
I don't think they can because the argument against locking him up then will be "he would be too expensive for just an okay 60pt winger so let's trade him for a real hockey player like tall center or right-handed defenseman".Fixed it for you.
The bigger risk from Jackets perspective might be that by the time they're ready to compete there won't be a single core player on a long team friendly contract to avoid cap issues.
I don't think they can because the argument against locking him up then will be "he would be too expensive for just an okay 60pt winger so let's trade him for a real hockey player like tall center or right-handed defenseman".
Waddell can negotiate with Marchenko’s agent, Dan Milstein of Gold Star Hockey, up to the start of the hearing and the talented Russian is guaranteed a new contract by the end of the week. The Blue Jackets have never gone to an arbitration hearing in their 24-year history.
"We’ll know (Wednesday), one way or another," Waddell said. "We’re trying to negotiate a deal, and the agent's been very up front with us. We’ve thought we were close multiple times, but the player filed for arbitration, and he has that right. So, once they filed, we said, ‘OK, we know we’re going to get a contract.'"
I enjoy Marchy. I believe he is my new/current favorite Jacket. He might have been last year too but for sure moving forward.
Chinakhov’s better!!!I enjoy Marchy. I believe he is my new/current favorite Jacket. He might have been last year too but for sure moving forward.