FriendlyGhost92
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2023
- 5,218
- 6,323
Lawson Crouse for Kirby Dach
Good Lord how far as Crouse fallen from grace lol.
Lawson Crouse for Kirby Dach
what is price? I’d flip a 2nd for him
Dach + Mailloux + 2nd for ClarkeKing's love projects! Sounds perfect. Not too expensive and makes it look like Blake is doing something!
He actually looked better early on.He never should have played as early as he did in the NHL, but he's just not that guy, mentally. Combine that with injuries and I'm not shocked he's struggling again.
Another can't-miss-player whose stock has fallen from what I can tell.
Reacting badly to (appropriate) criticism by your coaches and GM isn't a recipe for success. That kind of thing rarely works out for any player.
Regardless if the Habs decide to move him now I can't see the return being anything more than "underwhelming".
Dachs got little to no valueDach + Mailloux + 2nd for Clarke
Respectfully to Habs fans, I don't think many GMs will trade for Mailloux because of the potential backlash. Habs may be stuck with him until he proves a bit more.Dachs got little to no value
2nd has little value specially in a draft that is seeen as weak
Mailloux aint a conversation starter for clarke
Try again
Agreed.... hes going to have to show hes a capable NHL talent before teams even start to consider him.Respectfully to Habs fans, I don't think many GMs will trade for Mailloux because of the potential backlash. Habs may be stuck with him until he proves a bit more.
Dachs got little to no value
2nd has little value specially in a draft that is seeen as weak
Mailloux aint a conversation starter for clarke
Try again
Respectfully to Habs fans, I don't think many GMs will trade for Mailloux because of the potential backlash. Habs may be stuck with him until he proves a bit more.
Respectfully to Habs fans, I don't think many GMs will trade for Mailloux because of the potential backlash. Habs may be stuck with him until he proves a bit more.
If Mailloux has the tools to be as productive as Clarke, why would we trade him as well as other assets for Clarke? Doesn’t add upMailloux + Calgary 1st + Armia/Evans?
Mailloux certainly has the physical tools to be as productive as Clark in the NHL. His offensive toolbox is full.
The thing with him is his decision making...
Defensively it can be an adventure and he's a brain fart machine, when not on his game.
But surely he has what it takes to be an NHLer.
Will he be a Sheldon Sourray or a type of guy you can play in all situations, if he gets his shit together with maturity, the jury is still out debating about him...
Armia/Evans would be a great addition for the playoffs in LA. Both are typical TD stuff for aspiring teams.
Calgary's 1st is actually around 15-16th, but they're +/- on a gradual downfall and them finishing around 11-13th (at the draft) is far from impossible.
In my book, my offer is quite fair...
Dach trade was a swing and a miss. Perimeter players who can’t take criticism never amount to anything. Screwed Gm work by Chicago to ditch him that quickly.
Pro scouting failed the habs
At the same age Strome had almost 50 points more in basically the same number of NHL games played while also not having the massive injury concerns and (IMO) a significantly higher draft pedigree.I guess the cautionary parable if you are afraid of moving off his potential too early is Dylan Strome, but at the same age (24), Strome had put up the best season between the two and was more of a true center. Still, there are some similarities.
If Mailloux has the tools to be as productive as Clarke, why would we trade him as well as other assets for Clarke? Doesn’t add up
why are we believing anything from a podcast
Just not a realistic trade imoCause there is some flaws in his game.
He could be as productive, but the rest is a big question mark.
I think Clark is a more polished young player, with less uncertainties...