OldCraig71
Sleeveen
LOL but that had more to do with staying on the good side of the media and you know it. Lars Eller didn't get that treatment and neither did PK Subban.That management showed a lot of patience for Desharnais and Drouin.
LOL but that had more to do with staying on the good side of the media and you know it. Lars Eller didn't get that treatment and neither did PK Subban.That management showed a lot of patience for Desharnais and Drouin.
LOL but that had more to do with staying on the good side of the media and you know it. Lars Eller didn't get that treatment and neither did PK Subban.
Last year it was okay. Part of the rebuild and in the long ru. It actually helped us. This year it sucks. I was hoping to see progression largely because of Dach’s return and it hasn’t worked out.It was fine early in the season when everyone on the team sucked, but most of the players have found their game and are playing well now. Suzuki is producing like a legit #1, Caufield and Slaf form a legit #1 line. The bottom 6 is on fire, Monty is playing well, the defense has tightened up without Barron.
It sucks but Dach is the main problem holding the team back right now, if we had a real 2nd line we would be so much better as a team. Of course we shouldn't waive him but it is frustrating seeing our potential as a team held back so drastically.
We're essentially wasting 2 seasons because of Dach, but maybe it will all be for the best if we get a bonus tank year and he bounces back next season.
The problem is also nobody showed a level of play high enough for even stupid therrien to be forced to play somebody over Davey. That's on management. The only guy was Pleki and I love the guy but he also had his warts.I think that was Therrien's personal preferences, actually.
Also Bouillon.
It was a failure of epic proportions not to have a good one-two punch at center with the core he inherited and they put personal longevity ahead of prioritizing winning. Bergevin was so shitty at his job that he wouldn't trade Ryan Poehling for Ryan O'Reilly, a move that would have made us a cup contender. His years were truly the "Wasted Years" and not the kind referenced by one of my favorite bands of all time, Iron Maiden.I think that was Therrien's personal preferences, actually.
Also Bouillon.
That management showed a lot of patience for Desharnais and Drouin.
@DAChampion is correct though, they did coddle DD and Drou. I used to joke that if we traded for Crosby, he would have second-line center duties behind Desharnais. God, that was such a dark time to be a Habs fan. I'm not over it yet.The problem is also nobody showed a level of play high enough for even stupid therrien to be forced to play somebody over Davey. That's on management. The only guy was Pleki and I love the guy but he also had his warts.
In hindsight the two guys I wanted them to play more was Galchenyuk and Eller but look what they became , Chucky lost his mind and Larry became probably the best third line C in the game for 2-3 years in Washington.
The fact nobody inside the organisation could dethrone DD is pathetic and the fact we couldn't get anybody outside the org to dethrone him is an indictment on everybody involved management to coaching , yuck what dark days man . I hate that era
Mostly shows me when you don’t have a plan B at center you talk about patience and being resilient lol.Gee,
I wonder why.........
Couldn't be because they were des petits gars de chez nous.
Some were calling the toffoli trade a bad one and 3 years later, it's looking better. How about we do the same on this move? Especially when Dach is slowly making signs of improvement?“it’s too early to call it a bad trade”
Fellas, we are through the better part of his 4 year contract and his combined production has been less than 50 pts. This is bad and there is nowhere to go but up.
We traded for an injury prone player who felt jaded (and played badly) in his first post-injury year with CHI and now we’re seeing it repeat exactly the same way.
The best thing that could happen is he shakes this malaise off THIS season and gives us a glimmer of hope for next season as a 8th or 7th top6 option.
If he ends the season without elevating his performance, I’m not sure we will retain him come the time of a contract extension. He’ll seek guaranteed top dollar (given his fragility) and we’ll be rightfully cautious against the downside risk of repeating this horror-show.
Therefore, if you track the trajectory of the moving parts, and until he shows a glimpse of sustained progress, this has been a sour trade.
It’s the waiting and seeing him kill the 2nd line until then that has most people unimpressed (that’s on the org and coach), not his potential comeback itself. Not sure what crow peeps would eat.My prediction : Dach will find his game and play at 0.8 PPG until the end of the season.
Just wait and see, there is enough crow for everyone!
What do you mean “it’s looking better”? The Habs gave up a NHLer who provided a 70pt season to Calgary and also brought back further assets and in exchange the Habs have a 23 year old rookie bottom6 player to show for it. I’m not interested in arguing about the Toffoli trade anyway, even if Mešar looks far from the NHL right now.Some were calling the toffoli trade a bad one and 3 years later, it's looking better. How about we do the same on this move? Especially when Dach is slowly making signs of improvement?
That’s absolutely false. DD went like 20 games without a point and kept his job. Chuck was better in every way and was no worse defensively than DD but was STILL regulated to the third. Dumbest shit ever.The problem is also nobody showed a level of play high enough for even stupid therrien to be forced to play somebody over Davey.
Jagr wanted to come here as a UFA. Instead we got Boiluillion, Prust, Shaw….It was a failure of epic proportions not to have a good one-two punch at center with the core he inherited and they put personal longevity ahead of prioritizing winning. Bergevin was so shitty at his job that he wouldn't trade Ryan Poehling for Ryan O'Reilly, a move that would have made us a cup contender. His years were truly the "Wasted Years" and not the kind referenced by one of my favorite bands of all time, Iron Maiden.
Right. Even if the trade doesn’t work out, that does not mean it was a bad trade. You can make a good trade and still have a bad outcome.Some were calling the toffoli trade a bad one and 3 years later, it's looking better. How about we do the same on this move? Especially when Dach is slowly making signs of improvement?
100%It’s the waiting and seeing him kill the 2nd line until then that has most people unimpressed (that’s on the org and coach), not his potential comeback itself. Not sure what crow peeps would eat.
Benoit Pouliot!! Oh my gosh.Everyone rooting he goes from a rehabing Pouliot/Drouin hybrid on his best shifts (and their worse) to Lecavalier for sure.
The Toffoli trade was criticized for trading him too quickly and not getting enough back with the term he had. Yet one can argue MTL got the best return out of CGY and NJD. Also noteworthy that was after he produced better numbers out of Montreal and the aforementioned 70 pts season. A 1st is a 1st. If Evans is traded for a 1st and we pick a bust that means it was a bad trade? Things don't work that way. Especially when talking about trading players over 30 or close to it.What do you mean “it’s looking better”? The Habs gave up a NHLer who provided a 70pt season to Calgary and also brought back further assets and in exchange the Habs have a 23 year old rookie bottom6 player to show for it. I’m not interested in arguing about the Toffoli trade anyway, even if Mešar looks far from the NHL right now.
Dach “is slowly making signs of improvement” okay, even if true, that doesn’t change my argument at all, does it?
I actually don't care about the trade cost anymore. Everyone, including me, thought it was a good gamble at the time. The problem is, the same people who say it was a good gamble don't understand that labelling it a gamble means there was a chance to come up short. It was never a slam dunk, and sometimes, you need to cut your losses. I am not saying that time is now as we still have time, but we can't have infinite patience with a player when we have other players coming up soon to challenge for that spot. Our rebuild never has and never will hinge on the success of Kirby Dach.The Toffoli trade was criticized for trading him too quickly and not getting enough back with the term he had. Yet one can argue MTL got the best return out of CGY and NJD. Also noteworthy that was after he produced better numbers out of Montreal and the aforementioned 70 pts season. A 1st is a 1st. If Evans is traded for a 1st and we pick a bust that means it was a bad trade? Things don't work that way. Especially when talking about trading players over 30 or close to it.
My point for Dach is that if he returns to form in 20 games, we're okay with just pivoting back and stop saying it was a bad trade? I don't understand the need from some to make premature takes Especially when the player concerned has been making progress. What's exactly the point?
I actually don't care about the trade cost anymore. Everyone, including me, thought it was a good gamble at the time. The problem is, the same people who say it was a good gamble don't understand that labelling it a gamble means there was a chance to come up short. It was never a slam dunk, and sometimes, you need to cut your losses. I am not saying that time is now as we still have time, but we can't have infinite patience with a player when we have other players coming up soon to challenge for that spot. Our rebuild never has and never will hinge on the success of Kirby Dach.
Hage may be the internal replacement but he isn’t going to be that guy next year. In fact, people are high on him but he is far from a blue chip can’t miss prospect.We can and likely will wait out this season though, unless another team has a similar player in a similar situation and we do a Latendresse/Pouliot style swap. Anaheim with Zegras and Buffalo with Cozens come to mind, we’d likely have to add in either scenario though.
In the meantime I’d like to see Evans get time with Laine and Heineman to form a “2nd” line. Evans and Heineman are work horses and can likely generate 5v5 with Laine.
Dach can play with Gallagher / Anderson and try to get his shit together.
The likely internal replacement for Dach is Hage, Demidov being moved to C, or our #1 overall pick in the upcoming draft. So with that said, we aren’t holding anyone back per se right now.
Hage may be the internal replacement but he isn’t going to be that guy next year. In fact, people are high on him but he is far from a blue chip can’t miss prospect.
If they don’t find a legit 2c this summer and fix the horrid D core they will be out of the mix by the end of November. They need to bring in legit quality vets at those two positions not to mention fix the bottom six.
Dwight King, Steve Ott and Andreas Martinsen were a few more moves to address needs lol.Jagr wanted to come here as a UFA. Instead we got Boiluillion, Prust, Shaw….
Into his third season with the Habs Dach has collected a combined 50 pts. He’s suffered at least two notable injuries (one medium, one major). He’s been very slow to recover from his latest one.I don't understand the need from some to make premature takes Especially when the player concerned has been making progress. What's exactly the point?