Player Discussion Kirby Dach: Welcome to Montreal part 2

Pompeius Magnus

Registered User
May 18, 2014
21,221
19,166
Kanata ,ON
Monahan and Gallagher would be good linemates for him I think. Gallagher looks rejuvenated, same with Monahan. Both those guys can finish around the net and let Dach be the primary pick carrier.
I like that idea a lot, feels like there could be some chemistry there. Style wise it's a nice mix. Monahan can take all the left side faceoffs too. Gally doesn't need to have the puck to do his thing, Monahan is good at protecting the puck and working the cycle, Dach can do the zone entries and skate them out of trouble in the defensive zone.
 

Vachon23

Registered User
Oct 14, 2015
19,237
23,551
Victoriaville
He should be on PP1.. only Caufield looked better than him on the PP and he's easily the best passer on the team.
Only thing, it's that they play in the same spot on the PP. I would't mind if he start on the PP2 but he's the guy on that PP until that have always the puck. Could be good for his confidence
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,599
107,131
Halifax
Only thing, it's that they play in the same spot on the PP. I would't mind if he start on the PP2 but he's the guy on that PP until that have always the puck. Could be good for his confidence

A good PP has a lot of movement. So I don't see an issue there because Dach can switch down to the front of the net, make plays behind the goal-line, leak out to the point. Caufield can slip into the bumper or go to the other side of the ice.
 

Vachon23

Registered User
Oct 14, 2015
19,237
23,551
Victoriaville
A good PP has a lot of movement. So I don't see an issue there because Dach can switch down to the front of the net, make plays behind the goal-line, leak out to the point. Caufield can slip into the bumper or go to the other side of the ice.
Of course, there is a lot of things you can do and I'm sure Dach could be successful playing behind the goal line and have an option to give it to Caufield or Suzuki but I would like him to take control of the 2nd PP. I think it would be good for his offensive confidence.
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,599
107,131
Halifax
Of course, there is a lot of things you can do and I'm sure Dach could be successful playing behind the goal line and have an option to give it to Caufield or Suzuki but I would like him to take control of the 2nd PP. I think it would be good for his offensive confidence.

I don't know if it will 'cause he'll get less ice-time, it always comes off of a zone clear, so you have to establish the zone with less than a minute left.. and he will have to create something with who's left.. Drouin? Gallagher? Dvorak? None of these guys are gonna help him get PP confidence by doing nothing positive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlafySZN

Vachon23

Registered User
Oct 14, 2015
19,237
23,551
Victoriaville
I don't know if it will 'cause he'll get less ice-time, it always comes off of a zone clear, so you have to establish the zone with less than a minute left.. and he will have to create something with who's left.. Drouin? Gallagher? Dvorak? None of these guys are gonna help him get PP confidence by doing nothing positive.
Yes that's a point, it would probably have been a better option if we had finisher on the 2nd PP unit. Hoffman seem to have even loss his scoring touch
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings

Simarino

Registered User
Oct 21, 2009
3,717
3,561
A good PP has a lot of movement. So I don't see an issue there because Dach can switch down to the front of the net, make plays behind the goal-line, leak out to the point. Caufield can slip into the bumper or go to the other side of the ice.
Can you send this message to Burrows please!!
 

Redux91

I do Three bullets.
Sep 5, 2006
47,141
43,643
Kirkland, Montreal
A good PP has a lot of movement. So I don't see an issue there because Dach can switch down to the front of the net, make plays behind the goal-line, leak out to the point. Caufield can slip into the bumper or go to the other side of the ice.
You could put Dach in Widemans spot on the PP and he would do a better job ffs lol

But I agree, not hard to fit Dach into a PP1 with CC and Suz at established locations

I'm an overload PP1 for 1:30min over a 2 PP unit man anyway
 

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,560
16,395
If i’m not mistaken he was on PP1 this morning in practice with Caufield, Suzuki, Hoffman & Monahan. I saw some clips it seems like he was at the point, instead of a D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

donghabs98

Moderator
Oct 14, 2010
33,108
18,156
Halifax


Still wish we found a way to lose Romanov but pretty understandable when you look at it this way. We simply didnt have the depth at center compared to D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redux91

Paddy17

Registered User
Apr 10, 2021
2,032
4,117
A good PP has a lot of movement. So I don't see an issue there because Dach can switch down to the front of the net, make plays behind the goal-line, leak out to the point. Caufield can slip into the bumper or go to the other side of the ice.
Habs's PP has no movement, so the shooting lanes rarely open. Every so-called movement goes through the pointman, who distributes either left or right.

Couple that with the other major problem of rarely being able to gain the zone and set-up (or winning faceoffs to set-up).

It's the most inept PP strategy I've seen in the league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
21,946
25,803
Habs's PP has no movement, so the shooting lanes rarely open. Every so-called movement goes through the pointman, who distributes either left or right.

Couple that with the other major problem of rarely being able to gain the zone and set-up (or winning faceoffs to set-up).

It's the most inept PP strategy I've seen in the league.

We're entering the "Just give it to Cole" era.

It's not ideal, but it's better than the "Powerless play" era of the last number of years.
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,260
71,008


Still wish we found a way to lose Romanov but pretty understandable when you look at it this way. We simply didnt have the depth at center compared to D.

Romanov tops out as a defensive #4 dman in my opinion. We already have a bunch of 2way dmen that can replace him or have even more potential. It just hurt that the Hawks used that pick on one of my favorites in Nazar, but we only traded Romanov to get Dach. Even if Dach tops out as a 40 point center, I'd take that over Romanov any day of the week and Dach has the potential to do more.
 

BaseballCoach

Registered User
Dec 15, 2006
21,272
9,595
Romanov tops out as a defensive #4 dman in my opinion. We already have a bunch of 2way dmen that can replace him or have even more potential. It just hurt that the Hawks used that pick on one of my favorites in Nazar, but we only traded Romanov to get Dach. Even if Dach tops out as a 40 point center, I'd take that over Romanov any day of the week and Dach has the potential to do more.
It was a good gamble in my opinion. Romanov's cheapest years were finished but he does not appear to be more than a #4 while Guhle and Xhekaj still have more untapped potential.

Meanwhile, the potential to acquire a big 21 year old former high pick who can be a 2C could not be passed up.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad