RememberTheRoar
“I’m not as worried about the 5-on-5 scoring.”
Not surprising that Mr. “Kane was depth” can’t properly evaluate players.Teuvo scores sixty+ points a year and is defensively responsible. He's on an amazing contract.
Not surprising that Mr. “Kane was depth” can’t properly evaluate players.Teuvo scores sixty+ points a year and is defensively responsible. He's on an amazing contract.
I'm pretty sure he thought Teuvo would be playing in Europe by now. Oops.Not surprising that Mr. “Kane was depth” can’t properly evaluate players.
Ya, for a guy who tries to clown all of us, he sure is wrong a lot, huh?I'm pretty sure he thought Teuvo would be playing in Europe by now. Oops.
I never thought Hagel would actually be a legit top 6er. I thought for sure he'd be a bottom 6 player on Tampa.Hagel just scored his 19th of the season. Not bad for a $1.5 M utility forward.
I never thought Hagel would actually be a legit top 6er. I thought for sure he'd be a bottom 6 player on Tampa.
They would have had to send him to Saskatoon.
Idk how to say this, but Dach was too good for Saskatoon but ineligible for the AHL.
There should be some sort of exemption with the CHL agreement.
I don't blame previous management for the Dach situation as much as I blame the CHL agreement. Dach needed to be in Rockford playing against men as an 18 year old.
I liked Kirby but it wouldn't have happened here, similar to Teravainen.
Just forget he was ever a Blackhawk.
They also rushed Boqvist, who was a longer term player with huge upside when drafted. He shouldn't have sniffed the NHL until his D+3 season. We all knew that when they picked him.
If they're not good enough for the NHL, it means they're not too good for the CHLSo many top prospects are rushed because they're too good for the CHL and not good enough for the NHL.
If they're not good enough for the NHL, it means they're not too good for the CHL
Find me a player who had their career ruined from playing in the CHL in their D+1 yearWhat an odd opinion to have, there are many levels between CHL and NHL, some players develop faster physically and playing at 18-19 against kids doesn't best serve their development. If the argument is, we must do all that we can to allow the CHL to thrive that's at least one thing, but there are many players who aren't best served in the NHL because it's too fast and are too big/strong/good to be playing against 16 year olds.
How would one prove that?Find me a player who had their career ruined from playing in the CHL in their D+1 year
I asked about Dach in this forum when he was traded. Someone mentioned that he is going to be another Spezza. Fine by me.
The skill was there but what surprised me is the speed and bad dandruff attitude. As he's filling out, he has become more aggressive and sometimes, downright goonish.
What I'm hoping (shoot me for being a fan) is that we get Dubois, which will make Dach redundant at center and a damn good wingman. A Dach/Dubois combo would be tough to contain AND skilled.
I was of that opinion as well.I'm pretty sure he thought Teuvo would be playing in Europe by now. Oops.
Thanks for proving my pointHow would one prove that?
I apologize for being unable to phase shift into alternate timelines.Thanks for proving my point
I don't think he's 212 pounds anymore.Great clips. That's the kind of player he needs to be with his size.
That makes no sense to what he was asking.Thanks for proving my point
Doesn't win faceoffs .....bad for a center.....doesn't win board battles.....bad for a forward......he's got talent.....but I'm pretty damn excited about the return for Dach, Debrincat and Hagel......Hagel would have been the one I would have loved to hang on to of the three, but the return was insane....how do you turn that down?