Whether they are going to be a top team in 2026 or mid-pack or what, really is not the point. Anyone looking at the OHL East could have told you that Kingston was not going to be a contending team. You locked goaltending, you lacked forward depth. BUT kingston had a whole slew of picks that in 26/27 would have made this team a contender. Just look at what you gave up for Willis as an example. A good GM and owner are capable of looking at their team and the league and realizing that unless Moses comes and parts Lake Ontario and tilts the ice for the fronts and builds a wall across the crease. This was not the year to go for it.
Are you going to use some good players? Yes, but consider a soft sell of either Uronen or Pienimi at the deadline and what that might have brought to the team.
The
@leafs4life94 is correct Kingston seems to be locked into this we have to go for it this year no matter what screw the future we wil just suck again for 2 years call it a rebuild and then we will trde everything away int he 3rd year and no matter what call it a success.
It is possible to have a 5 year plan but Springer can only count to 3
Refereeing in the OHL has always been a crap shoot. Every team deals with the same refs. The difference is that teams know what happens, and the good teams know how to win.
No matter how you look at it, you got beat by a better team. I did not hear any whining about game 5, which you guys could have won. Barrie made the necessary trades to roll 3 lines, while Kingston had a hard time finding 2 lines that were consistent.
Bottom ine is that until the organization takes a serious look at what it has this team is going to suck and isn ot going to bulid a base.
You harped about the Petes but the difference is that they hae been to the promised land and won. Fans know there is a plan and that the team will build to that plan and be back on top for more than 1 year.