I think teams make big mistakes when choosing captains from my experience. Shane was made captain in a room where older players may not have accepted that move. He was too young and had too much pressure. When you reward the highest potential point getter and the highest potential draft pick over true leadership skills, that will kill the room. There have been rumours that both Shane and Ludwinki have lost the room at times because personal performance took a front line to team success.
A great captain starts with a humble attitude, with a relentless compete level. It’s never an individual game for them, it’s always team first. It’s a person who has the unwavering respect of his team. You also want the leader to be an older player in my opinion, this way they have both young and older players in their reach. In Ludwinski’s case he needed to wait until Kingston traded Shane, but Hache was to me the obvious pick at the time.
As others have mentioned in a round about way, pouting because you didn’t get the point on the play doesn’t give your team mates a warm and fuzzy feeling. This really isn’t a knock on those guys, they are incredible players, I just think teams who have that ‘all in‘ captain, get the benefits that other teams lose out on.