Toggle sidebar

Confirmed with Link: Kings announce signing kovalchuk to 3 year contract.

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Kovalchuk could be the first 40+ goal scorer on the Kings in 25 years. Last one, I believe was Luc in 93-94, the year after the Cup appearance.
 
funky said:
We still have 3 mil left to play with this year barring trades. We have a decent looking roster and still room for improvements. So far so good this offseason. I love Dion but he is the one guy I would be pro active with and see if a team would be interested in him if we retained 1.25 mil. Dion at a 4 mil a year cap hit may interest some team.
Click to expand...

That's still $4m for the next 3 years. What are you taking back or giving up to make that happen? Retention alone probably isn't enough.

Johnny Utah said:
Anyone nervous about this deal? Over 6 million for a 35 year old? The Gaborik contract was an anchor at 4-5 million and he was only one year older than Kovy. I get we haven’t seen Kovy in the NHL in a few years and Gaborik has gone down hill but still...
Click to expand...

There's risk regardless of what gets done. There's no perfect thing to do. Kovalchuk cost nothing but cap space, and if it doesn't work, then the Kings just keep not winning playoff games. No different than it's been lately. Take the chance, there's plenty of time to rebuild if it doesn't work. A process that has its own risks involved.

WHOneedsSOX said:
Same reason a couple pending UFA's get traded. Someone might want early negotiation rights? Rieder isn't that great but he's still young. Someone might take a chance on it. And then someone else will own his RFA rights where they'll get compensation if he chooses not to sign with them and they qualify him.
Click to expand...

You would have to doubt anyone wants to quality him at his current number. Trading the rights of a straight UFA like Bishop is different than doing it with an average RFA 3rd line winger. There's no market for that. Especially since it's clear as day that once Kovalchuk came aboard, Rieder wasn't getting qualified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: King Trouty
The Butcher said:
Source or link?
Click to expand...

The Devils' ownership issues and financial woes were very well documented during that time.

A Change in the Devils’ Owners, but Not in the Boss
Lamoriello had a rough 2012-13 season, which started with the loss through free agency of his captain, Zach Parise. The Devils missed the playoffs, and Ilya Kovalchuk, the top scorer, retired and returned to Russia. There were reports of missed loan repayments and late paychecks for players. Lamoriello reassured reporters Thursday that he would re-sign the club’s best young forward, Adam Henrique.
Click to expand...

https://nypost.com/2013/06/17/devils-again-sliding-into-financial-mess/
The New Jersey Devils are again skating on very thin financial ice, The Post has learned.
The team’s cash-strapped owner, less than six months after restructuring its debt, has missed an interest payment and now risks defaulting on its new loan, a source with direct knowledge of the situation said.

The latest financial blow-up at Devils Arena Entertainment — a missed interest payment in April of nearly $3 million — has surprised those close to the once-proud NHL franchise.

“How can you do a restructuring Dec. 31 and default in April?” the source said. “It’s astounding.”
Devils Arena, which also operates the Prudential Center, the team’s home arena in Newark, owes lenders roughly $170 million.

At the end of 2012, Devils owner Jeff Vanderbeek struck a deal to refinance the team’s debt and buy out his partners, ending months of wrangling. The agreement, which combined the debt of the team with that of Devils Arena Entertainment, was aimed at giving him two years to stabilize the finances.
Click to expand...
 
DryIslandBartender said:
Kovalchuk could be the first 40+ goal scorer on the Kings in 25 years. Last one, I believe was Luc in 93-94, the year after the Cup appearance.
Click to expand...

Let's get to 30 before we worry about 40. Kovalchuk's last 40 goal year was 09-10. In his last 195 NHL games, which was 5-7 years ago, he averages 33 in 82 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: King Trouty
DryIslandBartender said:
Kovalchuk could be the first 40+ goal scorer on the Kings in 25 years. Last one, I believe was Luc in 93-94, the year after the Cup appearance.
Click to expand...
That would be amazing, but I highly doubt it.

That said, Kovalchuk is the most pure offensive talent the organization has had since Palffy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ibleedkings
Ziggy Stardust said:
Did you miss the part about them being financially strapped and missing payments as well?
Click to expand...
No. I certainly read that. But where is it written that they were happy to have their top scorer walk out on his contract? I'm not disputing their financial issues but you're asking me to read between the lines here. I know some pretty die hard devil fans that seem to remember how bad this move, along with parise departure, crippled this roster.
 
Am I reading correctly or Kings now have the highest payroll in the league? Ouch.

If I was Blake, I would be looking to dump a salary or two right about now.
 
The Butcher said:
Look. I'm all for celebrating our newest King and having some renewed hope in the team.

But ignoring that he walked out on a signed contract and left the devils twisting in the wind is not something I'm willing to forget. I think how you carry yourself and honoring your agreements is a big part of being a successful person. This is the kind of thing im referring to when I mention character flaws, not points or his performance in the 2012 playoffs.

Bah, nobody seems to care. Whatever.
Click to expand...

Nobody cares because Kovalchuk "retiring" was a mutually beneficial decision that likely had the full blessing of Devils' management at the time. They were hemorrhaging real world dollars, and staring down a long rebuild. Kovalchuk's retirement was a massive blessing for the Devils, and it came right before a cap recapture penalty would have taken effect.

Lou had his fingerprints all over that decision. Kovalchuk didn't just up and leave on his own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raccoon Jesus and KingsFan7824
What’s the over/under on goals for Kovy in 2018-19? How about games played?

I’m gonna go with 27 goals and 73 games.
 
KingsFan7824 said:
Let's get to 30 before we worry about 40. Kovalchuk's last 40 goal year was 09-10. In his last 195 NHL games, which was 5-7 years ago, he averages 33 in 82 games.
Click to expand...

One minor thing with Kovalchuk's last couple years with the Devils was that they made him switch to RW at even strength. Adam Oates was our assistant coach at the time and he somewhat adamant on righties playing the right side (Oates also did this as head coach in Washington with Ovechkin). Kovalchuk never did seem 100% comfortable playing RW.

And presumably Kovalchuk will have a better playmaking center in LA. With the Devils, he primarily had (a young) Adam Henrique or Travis Zajac. I think the offensive black hole known as Jacob Josefson got a few games centering Kovalchuk (as did Andrei Loktionov). The first half of 2010-11 was a small disaster as well. The Devils were thin on defense to begin with and then a rash of injuries hit. At some point we were calling up guys from the AHL who were 12th/13th on the depth chart before the season.

If you want to see a bad defense, pull up the Devils 2010-11 roster. The Devils had an awful start and everybody blamed Kovalchuk, but for some reason nobody pointed out the AHL caliber defense that couldn't break the puck out of the zone. When guys returned from injury (plus a much needed coaching change), Kovalchuk scored 18 goals in 34 games after the All-Star break.

We'll see how much Kovalchuk has left in the tank, but I just feel the need to point out that Kovalchuk wasn't necessarily optimized for offensive output during his time with the Devils.
 
  • Like
Reactions: savemefromtears, King Trouty, Legionnaire and 1 other person
SettlementRichie10 said:
Nobody cares because Kovalchuk "retiring" was a mutually beneficial decision that likely had the full blessing of Devils' management at the time. They were hemorrhaging real world dollars, and staring down a long rebuild. Kovalchuk's retirement was a massive blessing for the Devils, and it came right before a cap recapture penalty would have taken effect.

Lou had his fingerprints all over that decision. Kovalchuk didn't just up and leave on his own.
Click to expand...
If that's the case why were they offering 100 million for Parise just prior to his departure?

Really a lot of conjecture and speculation 6 years after the fact. Listen to the fans when we play in NJ next season, I think that will speak for itself.
 
The Butcher said:
If that's the case why were they offering 100 million for Parise just prior to his departure?

Really a lot of conjecture and speculation 6 years after the fact. Listen to the fans when we play in NJ next season, I think that will speak for itself.
Click to expand...

I don't believe they were looking to sell the team at the time they were trying to keep Parise.

Even if ownership was fine with it, I don't expect the fans to necessarily be cool with it since that was the final nail in the coffin for them sucking for a long stretch of time. Even with Kovalchuk, they missed the playoffs in 2013.

The big "F You" was Parise leaving. He was their captain and wound up walking with nothing to show for it immediately after making the SCFs.

I dislike Blake even though management/ownership low balled him and could have handled his contract negotiations much better. I feel it is the same type of thing here since it isn't the Devils fans' money: all they care about is the product on the ice and will feel upset if someone walks away from them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom