Shesterkybomb
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2016
- 17,550
- 19,240
I gave Goodrow a vote for not backing down from that tool, Laf and Chytil the other two
One could argue he has been the bigger piece of the trade so far. And that's not a slight on Tarasenko, who has been good. But Mikkola has been awesome.Mikkola has been a nice add for us. Cant wait for Lindgren to get back though, Harpur isn't the guy
An under the radar great game from Tarasenko….so steady
Add 23-77-4Much better.
Zibs line still MIA
Shesty, Kids, KAM, Panarin, Tro and Tank are playoff ready.
Carter just said the Rangers have taken their time developing Kakko and that he spent some time in the AHL... who's gonna tell him lmao.
When the Caps won their Cup they picked up Michal Kempny, which was an under the radar move at the time. He ended up being a big steadying influence at the end of their defensive rotation and was a big factor in their run. Mikkola feels like he could be that guy for us.One could argue he has been the bigger piece of the trade so far. And that's not a slight on Tarasenko, who has been good. But Mikkola has been awesome.
Not even close. Lindgren will be an RFA in summer 2024, so it isn't one year. He will be signed for at least 4 more years. And Mikkola isn't as good. The assets we would get back for Lindgren are worth far less than the value of keeping him.Mikkola at 2.5-3 plus assets in a Lindgren trade>1 year left of Lindgren.
Both Finns have played great since 77s arrival. I know we have bigger considerations but maybe we find another one for next year?
Cuylle will eventually be that guy.I wonder if there's anyone we could throw a late pick on in the draft that can fight and also not cost us games? With all the skill we have we need someone.
Gallant slander. 1-2-3 go!
Totally agree.Not even close. Lindgren will be an RFA in summer 2024, so it isn't one year. He will be signed for at least 4 more years. And Mikkola isn't as good. The assets we would get back for Lindgren are worth far less than the value of keeping him.