vorky
@vorkywh24
- Jan 23, 2010
- 11,576
- 1,360
I personally just don't think it is a good idea to oversimplify it that way, because money and influence/connections don't always go hand in hand here in a classical way at least.
As I've mentioned, both SKA and Avangard are Gazprom's teams, but that doesn't mean they're affiliated. On the other hand, Sochi/SKA unofficial affiliation is more connection based, which makes some sense, as Sochi benefits from it much more even without the Gazprom money. Different case is Vityaz though, as iirc, indeed a Gazprom's subsidiary was among their sponsors.
As you say it is not as simple as that. Therefore I am asking the poster to support/clarify his statement with facts.
If you are speaking about influence, we can not say that "Gazprom" in SKA, Avangard or Vityaz is the same entity/group. We need to differ among them. I know that it is a bit complicated/confusing for people not following the league too closely, as it is a bit complicated or confusing for them to "read the expansion talks." Not that easy, not that easy.