SoundAndFury
Registered User
- May 28, 2012
- 11,878
- 5,898
It's hilarious how big of a discussion every little nonsense out of somebody's mouth sparks here. There is 0 common sense in this speculation, how do you not get tired of it.
I don't think Sweden is the way to expand....I think KHL needs to join champions league and hope this tournament takes off. I know this will face tons of opposition, but there is no way to grow a small(-ish) sport without pan-European buy in.
I don't think Sweden is the way to expand....I think KHL needs to join champions league and hope this tournament takes off. I know this will face tons of opposition, but there is no way to grow a small(-ish) sport without pan-European buy in.
So far, from what I gather here, is that the KHL fans aren't actually interested in growing the sport. They are interested in growing KHL, and use "growing the sport" as a smoke screen.
So many times I've seen "KHL don't need CHL, CHL needs KHL", which while really funny, just proves my point. It's the "we want to grow hockey, but only if it grows KHL" mentality.
If you want to grow the European club hockey, you need to impress the fans, sponsors, media.I don't think Sweden is the way to expand....I think KHL needs to join champions league and hope this tournament takes off. I know this will face tons of opposition, but there is no way to grow a small(-ish) sport without pan-European buy in.
Considering how huge the losses are for example for Jokerit alone
My dear friend @Toro2017!That new book that Marko Lempinen wrote about Harkimo also tells us (iltasanomat.fi), that originally Timchenko and Rotenberg were ready to help Jokerit with 6 million euros per year, for three years. So that did not go at all as they planned and in reality Jokerit cost them 10-15 million euros per year. Losses are up to 60-70 million euros now. So lets hope that if/when KHL expand to Germany, France and other places, they have more realistic plans about finances. I would imagine that even in Germany credible KHL team could not become self sufficient with 6 million euros per year for three years.
Is in Sweden a territory, where isnt a big team in top league, where is good stadium, people are interested in hockey and from logistic points it isnt a hell ride?
That new book that Marko Lempinen wrote about Harkimo also tells us (iltasanomat.fi), that originally Timchenko and Rotenberg were ready to help Jokerit with 6 million euros per year, for three years. So that did not go at all as they planned and in reality Jokerit cost them 10-15 million euros per year. Losses are up to 60-70 million euros now. So lets hope that if/when KHL expand to Germany, France and other places, they have more realistic plans about finances. I would imagine that even in Germany credible KHL team could not become self sufficient with 6 million euros per year for three years.
Now that Leksand were promoted, I don't think so.
That matches with what username Cobol has been saying at Jatkoaika, that from what he's heard in Helsinki hockey/business circles (and that man has connections, not just Virmanen ), the losses were far bigger than the Russians anticipated.
By the way, the article also brought up the conundrum Harkimo faces with those Russian funders. They've wanted him out for long but because they're on sanction list, he has leverage. On the other hand, Harkimo actually does want to get rid of Jokerit, but because of those sanctions, no potential Finnish buyer wants to have anything to do with it.
this comes from Russian mentality, plain and simple. Has nothing to do with fanship.So far, from what I gather here, is that the KHL fans aren't actually interested in growing the sport. They are interested in growing KHL, and use "growing the sport" as a smoke screen.
So many times I've seen "KHL don't need CHL, CHL needs KHL", which while really funny, just proves my point. It's the "we want to grow hockey, but only if it grows KHL" mentality.
This is certainly true for those that support Hammarby in football, but there's also potential among those who do not have a preexisting strong affiliation with any club and are first and foremost interested in watching hockey. Younger generations are anyway more likely to choose between AIK and DIF even in soccer, while Hammarby's supporter base is much older. Regarding their own base AIK has the problem that many have an immigration background and do not have culturally as strong inclination towards hockey as they do towards football.
The Russian President recommended the French businessmen to finance the French KHL club, who has support from the French President.
I was so wrong with diplomacy ....
My dear friend!That is beyond pathetic. What an absolute joke.
My dear friend!
Feel free to teach them!
That is beyond pathetic. What an absolute joke.
In way way way more realistic and relevant news, Belarussian president Alexander Lukashenko while talking to the press yesterday said: "maybe they (Dynamo Minsk) will disgrace themselves for another season but afterwards we don't need KHL and we don't need such team".