joshjull
Registered User
Well done sir!All in all, it’s just another brick in the wall
Well done sir!All in all, it’s just another brick in the wall
His final dagger should've been the 13 game losing streak. If Pegula didnt fire him after that, it's not happening anytime soon barring another crazy long losing streak.His final dagger was insulting the people of WNY and making excuses for why he can't do his job with palm trees and taxes.
Fire this clown and don't ever let him associate with the crest of a Buffalo Sabre again.
His final dagger should've been the 13 game losing streak. If Pegula didnt fire him after that, it's not happening anytime soon barring another crazy long losing streak.
Turning a top ten pick into McLeod still stings.There are TONS of things to be pissed off about with his franchise in all areas of the organization. But worrying about what Savoie might, maybe, down the road potentially do with McDavid? It shouldn’t even be on your radar because it can’t happen here for obvious reasons.
Savoie and whoever we would have taken at pick 43 would have been better used as part of a package to get a 1C. Build from the top down. Poor asset management in my opinion.Turning a top ten pick into McLeod still stings.
He’s a 4CWe acquired a needed 3C for this season in McLeod.
Agreed. McLeod and Malenstyn aren't bad players but this team needs more talent and using 1st round prospects and 2nd round picks for 3rd and 4th round players is tough.Savoie and whoever we would have taken at pick 43 would have been better used as part of a package to get a 1C. Build from the top down. Poor asset management in my opinion.
Mcleod’s play has helped with the sting. He’s a good middle 6 center to have with a little more “seasoning” under his belt and has filled a role with the PK. He’s been our best centerman in terms of playing the position and supporting his teammates in all 3 zones.Turning a top ten pick into McLeod still stings.
Are you in the Hot Tub Time machine ? Mcleod hasn't done anything in weeks except very quietly center the "4th line".Mcleod’s play has helped with the sting. He’s a good middle 6 center to have with a little more “seasoning” under his belt and has filled a role with the PK. He’s been our best centerman in terms of playing the position and supporting his teammates in all 3 zones.
Savoie was most likely going to be a middle 6 player as well. I’m okay with the move. If you have an over abundance in prospects (assets) you use them to target to improve key roles on the roster. This point of the season, it’s one of the few moves in Adams whole tenure that I’ve come to like.
He’s fine, he’s not helping much directly but he’s calm which isn’t a common trait on the team. He doesn’t help but doesn’t hurt.Mcleod’s play has helped with the sting. He’s a good middle 6 center to have with a little more “seasoning” under his belt and has filled a role with the PK. He’s been our best centerman in terms of playing the position and supporting his teammates in all 3 zones.
Savoie was most likely going to be a middle 6 player as well. I’m okay with the move. If you have an over abundance in prospects (assets) you use them to target to improve key roles on the roster. This point of the season, it’s one of the few moves in Adams whole tenure that I’ve come to like.
And it’s been one of my issues with Ruff and his usage of the guy.Are you in the Hot Tub Time machine ? Mcleod hasn't done anything in weeks except very quietly center the "4th line".
once he lost Greenway he's been a different playerAnd it’s been one of my issues with Ruff and his usage of the guy.
Not shocking, the speed from McLeod and board play/defense from Greenway is a good combo and works and help produce results. Because Adams has failed at building a cohesive team, once we lost the one player of a certain type, it of course, throws things off.once he lost Greenway he's been a different player
Malenstyn for a 2nd.Savoie and whoever we would have taken at pick 43 would have been better used as part of a package to get a 1C. Build from the top down. Poor asset management in my opinion.
Yes.. pick 43 was the 11th pick in the 2nd round of the 2024 draft which was a fairlyMalenstyn for a 2nd.
It was Cole Hutson who looks great.Yes.. pick 43 was the 11th pick in the 2nd round of the 2024 draft which was a fairly
high pick.
and Cole Hutson looks like he will be a good playerYes.. pick 43 was the 11th pick in the 2nd round of the 2024 draft which was a fairly
high pick.
Re:boldedYou really love going over the top.
We acquired a needed 3C for this season in McLeod. We used a prospect who was unlikely to play for us this season and thus not going to help us. We also knew full well that down the road he may end up being the better player. The amount of young talent we had (especially Kulich) made it a doable thing. This trade is about as normal as it gets in this league.
I’m happy for Savoie that he doing well lately in the AHL. But it means nothing in the big picture of this season or whether the trade was worth it.
He is the Defenseman on team USA…smaller and left handed shot. But a good player.and Cole Hutson looks like he will be a good player
We could also use this pick for such a trade, but why, Adams is happy with it situation.He is the Defenseman on team USA…smaller and left handed shot. But a good player.
It was Cole Hutson who looks great.
During this tire fire of a GM run we could have had either Hutson and instead got Leinonen and Malenstyn
Because Kevyn Adams is a loser.