Player Discussion: Kent Johnson

Xoggz22

Registered User
Mar 4, 2002
7,988
3,572
Columbus, Ohio
over 82 games, kent johnson's current scoring pace would give him a final line of: 52g-41a–93p

over the last three seasons, the players with the closest statlines to that are:
  • kyle connor (21-22): 47-46–93 (79gp)
  • alex ovechkin (21-22): 50-40-90(77gp)
  • brayden point (22-23): 51-44–95 (82gp)
  • brayden point (23-24): 46-44–90 (82gp)
  • filip forsberg (23-24): 48-46–94 (82gp)
also that 2.36 5v5 G/60 is higher than:
  • every single player in the league last year with more than 150 minutes of ice time (matthews led the league at 1.84)
  • every single player in the league the year before that one (22-23)
  • also every player in the league the year before that too (21-22)
auston matthews had 1.94 g/60 at 5v5 in his best career season so far.

the obvious caveat here is that KJ is shooting 28% which isn't sustainable, but i cannot understate how good he looks this year. he's still creative and confident, but has stepped up his skating and puck protection and grown into an elite shooter.
To me... the exciting thing is that not only would he be expected to get better, but the supporting case will also improve. That's so incredibly fun to think about. He looks good and the stats support that he is really playing at that level. At some point I would like to see him play with Chinny. Just let him shoot and become that 30+ goal scorer I feel he has in him (Chinny).
 

S1N4TR4

CBJ CBJ CBJ
Nov 15, 2013
6,385
5,306
over 82 games, kent johnson's current scoring pace would give him a final line of: 52g-41a–93p

over the last three seasons, the players with the closest statlines to that are:
  • kyle connor (21-22): 47-46–93 (79gp)
  • alex ovechkin (21-22): 50-40-90(77gp)
  • brayden point (22-23): 51-44–95 (82gp)
  • brayden point (23-24): 46-44–90 (82gp)
  • filip forsberg (23-24): 48-46–94 (82gp)
also that 2.36 5v5 G/60 is higher than:
  • every single player in the league last year with more than 150 minutes of ice time (matthews led the league at 1.84)
  • every single player in the league the year before that one (22-23)
  • also every player in the league the year before that too (21-22)
auston matthews had 1.94 g/60 at 5v5 in his best career season so far.

the obvious caveat here is that KJ is shooting 28% which isn't sustainable, but i cannot understate how good he looks this year. he's still creative and confident, but has stepped up his skating and puck protection and grown into an elite shooter.

brayden point: a man of consistency.
 

cbjthrowaway

Registered User
Jul 4, 2020
2,438
4,366
Any Idea as to where we should expect his shooting percentage to regress to? What do we expect a "normal" year for KJ might be 40-50-90?.
iirc the baseline expectation is about 10-15%, and KJ's raw shooting talent is probably on the higher end of that range. i think a 'normal' year for KJ (assuming 82 games) is probably going to be something like 25-35 goals.

that said, i think there's room for growth beyond that, because:
  1. he's establishing himself as a shooting threat, which teams will have to account for, which will open up passing opportunities that he's smart and skilled enough to capitalize on
  2. once his reputation catches up to his skill level, teams will start giving him more respect on the power play
  3. we could see breakouts from other guys (fantilli in particular)
point #2 is key. you see how teams give kucherov a ton of space because they respect (fear?) him on the half-wall, and how the whole thing runs through him. if KJ starts getting a similar treatment, the jackets power play could really start humming once some other guys develop. that'll mean a lot more points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LJ7

VT

Registered User
Jan 24, 2021
7,996
4,425
Slovakia
over 82 games, kent johnson's current scoring pace would give him a final line of: 52g-41a–93p

over the last three seasons, the players with the closest statlines to that are:
  • kyle connor (21-22): 47-46–93 (79gp)
  • alex ovechkin (21-22): 50-40-90(77gp)
  • brayden point (22-23): 51-44–95 (82gp)
  • brayden point (23-24): 46-44–90 (82gp)
  • filip forsberg (23-24): 48-46–94 (82gp)
also that 2.36 5v5 G/60 is higher than:
  • every single player in the league last year with more than 150 minutes of ice time (matthews led the league at 1.84)
  • every single player in the league the year before that one (22-23)
  • also every player in the league the year before that too (21-22)
auston matthews had 1.94 g/60 at 5v5 in his best career season so far.

the obvious caveat here is that KJ is shooting 28% which isn't sustainable, but i cannot understate how good he looks this year. he's still creative and confident, but has stepped up his skating and puck protection and grown into an elite shooter.
Unfortunately, it's still early in the season and Johnson isn't playing with a center like Scheifelle, Backstrom/Kuznetsov, or a winger like Kucherov. Or a combination like O'Reilly and Nyquist, not forgetting that last year Preds was a system TOP team.
 

CBJx614

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 25, 2012
16,491
8,603
C-137
Unfortunately, it's still early in the season and Johnson isn't playing with a center like Scheifelle, Backstrom/Kuznetsov, or a winger like Kucherov. Or a combination like O'Reilly and Nyquist, not forgetting that last year Preds was a system TOP team.
That's the thing, he's producing without needing a top center because he's a play driver himself. And now that he's paired with Monahan I think we can continue to expect the production.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LJ7

VT

Registered User
Jan 24, 2021
7,996
4,425
Slovakia
That's the thing, he's producing without needing a top center because he's a play driver himself. And now that he's paired with Monahan I think we can continue to expect the production.
And who will score goals from his passes. Monahan? Besides, he can easily be moved back to Fantilli, as the Voronkov - Fantilli - Marchenko line isn't very productive.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
56,384
36,356
40N 83W (approx)
And who will score goals from his passes. Monahan?
Marchenko's also a pretty good finisher. Fantilli should get there once he's out of this slump.

EDIT: And if Chinakhov can keep from being regularly injured, well, he's got a fairly decent shot. ;)
 
Last edited:

VT

Registered User
Jan 24, 2021
7,996
4,425
Slovakia
Marchenko's also a pretty good finisher. Fantilli should get there once he's out of this slump.

EDIT: And if Chinakhov can keep from being regularly injured, well, he's got a fairly decent shot. ;)
Yegor does have a hard shot, but he doesn't have the accuracy of the top players yet. Marchenko seems overrated to me, I hope I'm wrong.
If I understand right you mean this season.
 

Cowumbus

Registered User
Mar 1, 2014
12,174
7,093
Arena District - Columbus
That's the thing, he's producing without needing a top center because he's a play driver himself. And now that he's paired with Monahan I think we can continue to expect the production.
No you have to have a good center to be good, we learned that with Laine. Guys aren’t able to drive play on their own silly!
 

Doggy

Registered User
Oct 11, 2011
3,890
3,015
Article by AP in The Athletic about KJ today. Talking to KJ and HCDE about KJ's noticeable production drop in the past few weeks. Nothing news shattering and perhaps pretty obvious stuff. I suspect KJ will benefit when we get away from the 11-7 lineups and getting some help from someone on his line who can keep up with him. But yeah...league has taken notice of him and he and the team are going to need to adjust.
 

Remparts666

Registered User
Feb 11, 2021
278
237
Article by AP in The Athletic about KJ today. Talking to KJ and HCDE about KJ's noticeable production drop in the past few weeks. Nothing news shattering and perhaps pretty obvious stuff. I suspect KJ will benefit when we get away from the 11-7 lineups and getting some help from someone on his line who can keep up with him. But yeah...league has taken notice of him and he and the team are going to need to adjust.

Is Chinakhov a good fit for him? I noticed that Evason had Fantili-Johnson-Plug and Sillinger-Chinakhov-plug before the injury to Yegor and I wondered why. Wouldnt it be ideal to have KJ and Chinakhov together developing chemistry given their profile?
 

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
12,116
13,831
Canada
Is Chinakhov a good fit for him? I noticed that Evason had Fantili-Johnson-Plug and Sillinger-Chinakhov-plug before the injury to Yegor and I wondered why. Wouldnt it be ideal to have KJ and Chinakhov together developing chemistry given their profile?
They were trying numerous things to get Fantilli going for awhile. Coaches also seem to really like Sillinger so maybe a Chinakhov-Sillinger-Johnson line when he's back. Jenner coming back would be absolutely huge for overall balance too
 
  • Like
Reactions: Remparts666

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad