sprong is better than kapanenSheary is better than Kapanen
sprong is better than kapanenSheary is better than Kapanen
Right, but we also have had the two best players in the league for all 3 cups in the 2000s and the arguable best ever for the first couple of cups. Also they kicked our ass in that conference final. I think your missing my point here which isn't about cups its about maintaining a contender while your core is aging which is was Boston has done since they won their cup and we have not since our back to back.
Also im not pitting the entirety of championships that Pitt has won vs Boston in their existence, I'm comparing how they have done in comparison since their cup wins in the 2010's
Kapanen has one of the lowest IQs among NHL players. It’s not debatable, just as is isn't that he is one of the fastest skaters. He lacks awareness of how his spot on the ice relates to what occurs around him and it is evident in almost every shift he takes.
Yes, Rust has started to figure things out, but he still isn't a smart player and it takes longer for low IQ players to adapt- hence why it took two years before he could play with Crosby without killing the cycle.
Y’all are a super pessimistic bunch. Dude hasn’t even touched the ice yet ( in this stint ) in a pens sweater and are just trashing this trade. Draft picks are extremely overrated. 1st rounders outside the top 8 picks are somewhat hard to judge. Lord.
This is the problem, too -- arrogance from the Pens front office. They managed to go back to back with some unheralded draft picks and now think they can fix any player that has horrible numbers and low IQ. JJ, Chucky, etc. Most of the JR trades that didn't work out came with those criticisms. Crosby especially needs high-IQ wingers, especially as he gets older.
I guess you could make that argument, Jim Rutherford.
I don't see any reason to not believe Kapanen was the best we could get with this package, but if you want to stick on that point. I get it. Like I said, I hope Kapanen turns into somewhat of a power forward.
I also think the analytics on him are a little fuzzy. He was really good one year and bad this year, but like.. everyone in Toronto sucked this year.
I also think our room will be a good place for Kapanen if he is focused. The issue is he has some character problems in Toronto and I question how he'll take the trade.
Just such a risky move for the value we gave up.
oh that I would like to seeLiterally months ago we acquired Jason Zucker for arguably less than this package. Compare what was assumed to be a ~25th overall pick + Calen Addison + terrible UFA Alex Galchenyuk with the 15th overall pick + Filip Hallander + serviceable RFA Evan Rodrigues.
Right before that, Boston acquired Ondrej Kase for a very late 1st and a Hallander-equivalent prospect. And on top of that, they dumped the equivalent of Jack Johnson.
It's pretty obvious that JR wanted Kapanen and zeroed in on him.
You do realize we're capable of watching and evaluating Kapanen prior to him dressing for the Pens, right? It's not like this guy just popped up out of nowhere and no one has any clue what kind of game he plays.
Ok, to clarify: Kapanen is a low IQ for an NHL player. Especially relative to his speed.Just because you claim it’s not debatable doesn’t really mean much TBTH.
KK has a good IQ, but most people really don’t know what they are watching when evaluating players, so I only ever trusted a handful of people when I can’t watch a guy, and sadly one of them is no longer around these parts.
If you want to see what a low IQ player is, watch Sprong or Yakupov.
Low IQ players don’t last long in the NHL.
Hagelin was a fantastic player for the Rangers for like five years before we acquired him. Daley was obviously playing on the wrong side of the ice with a new team. That is not comparable to this lmaoWhat was your evaluation of Hags when we just traded for him before he suited up. How bout Daley. Let’s see what a change of scenery, new system and just a new look does for him before we peg this as a piss poor trade.
My worry is the opposite: analytically speaking his outlier year is 2018-19 - his only great year. One in which he happened to reap the benefits of Matthews and Tavares going on shooting benders AND his RAPM GF numbers might be juiced by how much Nylander struggled to finish once he came back.
Kapanen is a more useful player than Galchenyuk so atleast there’s that.
Keep in mind that the Leafs are a much better team than the Wild though. And he'd been playing with better guys than ZuckerI’m just looking at NST stuff, but him and Zucker seem pretty comparable by the CF, xGF, stuff. over the last two seasons.
Keep in mind that the Leafs are a much better team than the Wild though. And he'd been playing with better guys than Zucker
I was excited about Hagelin because he was a good player?What was your evaluation of Hags when we just traded for him before he suited up. How bout Daley. Let’s see what a change of scenery, new system and just a new look does for him before we peg this as a piss poor trade.
sprong is better than kapanen
What was your evaluation of Hags when we just traded for him before he suited up. How bout Daley. Let’s see what a change of scenery, new system and just a new look does for him before we peg this as a piss poor trade.