Kshahdoo
Registered User
Say, both start their NHL careers in the same season. Who will have the better chance to win Calder?
Why would it? Calder is for the best NHL rookie, if you’re not allowing europeans to play proffesionally prior to NHL and still Compete for calder then there woulndn’t be one european calder winner in the world.The fact Kaprizov played so many seasons in a professionnal league does not prevent him from being Calder eligible?
The fact Kaprizov played so many seasons in a professionnal league does not prevent him from being Calder eligible?
The fact Kaprizov played so many seasons in a professionnal league does not prevent him from being Calder eligible?
Why would it? Calder is for the best NHL rookie, if you’re not allowing europeans to play proffesionally prior to NHL and still Compete for calder then there woulndn’t be one european calder winner in the world.
The eligibility rules have not changed since Panarin won the Calder: a player must be under age 26 on September 15 of the year in which the season starts, and must not have played 25 games in any one season or six games in each of any two preceding seasons in any major professional league.Unless they've changed the rules after Panarin did the same thing 4 years ago, it shouldn't be an issue.
Seems like some don't remember Hughes and Kakko.
Seems like someone has a rather "low" opinion of Lafrenière if he thinks he is similar to those guys.
I don't have a low opinion of Hughes or Kakko. You seem to. I'm trying to be realistic. After what we've seen from this season, I don't believe you can project every high pick as an instant impact player. Some will be, and others won't, but projecting them as instant impact isn't something I think we should be doing. McDavid, Matthews, Dahlin, Eichel is a different story. Svechnikov wasn't instant impact if you look back a year. Some will be, and others won't.
I think it's a lot more likely that Kaprizov has the better season. I can't imagine a scenario where he's less than .5PPG. With Lafreniere, I don't think you can rule out that he's under .33PPG.
Kaprizov probably has the edge as a rookie, since he'll be 5 years older, but Lafrieniere will be the much better player.
.33 PPG would be atrocious for Lafrenière, IMO. That means like 27 points. If Lafrenière gets 27 points, I will be EXTREMELY surprised AND disappointed. Of course, that is contingent on a 82-game schedule. If they play 48, 16 points would be horrible for Lafrenière. I think he is safe for .5PPG.
The reason I used PPG instead of raw point totals is because we might not have an 82 game season.
Hughes was .34, Kakko was .35, but only .004 higher than Hughes, so nearly identical. His number only looks higher because its rounded up. Svechnikov was definitely better, but he was also below .5PPG. I'm not even suggesting Lafreniere will play bad. We just don't know what his situation will be. What if he's on the 3rd line playing 13 minutes per game and only the second PP?
I feel a lot more comfortable projecting a 23 year old to be pretty close to what he'd play like and produce numbers as in his prime. I don't even think Kaprizov is that good. Some suggest he's the next Russian star. Not what I've seen. I think he'll be a lot more in line with someone like Dadonov than Panarin, but he's 23 years old, and .5-.75 should be very realistic. He shouldn't be that far away next season from his ceiling. Maybe you account for a little extra TOI, slightly better situations, slightly better adjustment to NA and the NHL in 2-3 more seasons, but I look at Kaprizov as very close to a finished product.
The reason I used PPG instead of raw point totals is because we might not have an 82 game season.
Hughes was .34, Kakko was .35, but only .004 higher than Hughes, so nearly identical. His number only looks higher because its rounded up. Svechnikov was definitely better, but he was also below .5PPG. I'm not even suggesting Lafreniere will play bad. We just don't know what his situation will be. What if he's on the 3rd line playing 13 minutes per game and only the second PP?
I feel a lot more comfortable projecting a 23 year old to be pretty close to what he'd play like and produce numbers as in his prime. I don't even think Kaprizov is that good. Some suggest he's the next Russian star. Not what I've seen. I think he'll be a lot more in line with someone like Dadonov than Panarin, but he's 23 years old, and .5-.75 should be very realistic. He shouldn't be that far away next season from his ceiling. Maybe you account for a little extra TOI, slightly better situations, slightly better adjustment to NA and the NHL in 2-3 more seasons, but I look at Kaprizov as very close to a finished product.
He’s really old for his draft year, and has good size coming into the league. I don’t expect Lafreniere to have much issue adapting to the NHL.
Who thought back to then, that Panarin would become top5 NHL player?
Trust me, he can.Cant assume that Kaprizov will do that just because he’s Russian.
I’ve got Kaprizov because he’s been playing in a men’s league and has about 5 years of bulking up on Lafreniere. Should be a smoother transition in my opinion. I could definitely see Lafreniere winning it though.
How about, neither one.