Steve Yzerlland
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2018
- 9,214
- 4,778
Man I wanted 3 years! I'll gamble on Kane.Chris Johnston saying it's a one-year deal in his article he wrote for the Athletic.
Man I wanted 3 years! I'll gamble on Kane.Chris Johnston saying it's a one-year deal in his article he wrote for the Athletic.
Low risk, really high reward.
He played at an almost 70 point pace in CHicago last year, on a bad team, with his hip bugging him. The real question is does the surgery help him get his wheels back or will e be worse off than last year?
The wings might have just added a 70-80 point winger...
Try telling me of ten years ago that.A lot has changed in 10 years.
Doubt he'll be ready to go by Thursday, but man would that be a fun storyline.Is Kanes first game in a Red Wings uniform going to be against the Blackhawks?
If it works and he gels, Yzerman will likely extend him for a couple. If it doesn't work, and we completely fall out of the playoff picture by the deadline, we flip him for a first. Win-win scenario here in my books.Man I wanted 3 years! I'll gamble on Kane.
All he can eat bitterballen and stroopwafel.I wonder what Kane gets Sprong to get #88??
All he can eat bitterballen and stroopwafel.
"Nay, Ja, it is just a number." -Daniel Sprong on why he gave Kane his number.
Need @Killerjas to weigh in on my dutch impression.
Each playing for 3 Original Six teams?Trivia:
What do Patrick Kane and Tyler Bertuzzi have in common?
So does this mean Rasmussen gets bumped to the third line? I have no problem with that, just wondering how this all shakes out.
What did he sign for $$$$$
Why would you move Raymond? Hasn't DeBrincat been on the 2nd line? I think you would want to reignite that chemistry between the two of them.I'd probably run:
Debrincat-Larkin-Kane
Fabbri-Compher-Raymond