That's 4 1st rounders.
For offer sheet purposes, if the offer is >5 years, you take the total $'s divided by 5.Per capfriendly you can go up to $8.4m x 7 and it is only one 1st. 4 1sts is over $10.5m per.
I said 5.8 - 6.2 x 5Devil's advocate: Why would he sign that? Offer sheet compensation for a deal up to 4,201,488 is a second round pick. Up to 6,302,230 is a First and a Third. If he's actually as good as everyone says, why wouldn't an opposing GM throw a 5M+ offer at him just to make Drury's life miserable? They could throw the same type of deal at Chytil and put the Rangers in a really bad spot.
For offer sheet purposes, if the offer is >5 years, you take the total $'s divided by 5.
You can offer $8.4 x 5 and only give up the one 1st rounder.
$8.4 x 7 = $58.8 / 5 = $11.8 which is >$10.5 and would be 4 1sts.
I said 5.8 - 6.2 x 5
If someone throws something like 9ish per x 7 that is a prob
howev, not seeing that esp since most clubs do not have cap flex to go there
imo KAM not gonna bolt for a bit more. Makeup of the club is essential
Rangers young core is key here
imo prob yes assuming trade is not more profitable.Ah ok, well then $8.4m x 5 would be the offer. I'd rather have Miller than a 2024 1st, even a high 1st.
Do the Rangers match at $8.4m x 5?
Do you think the Rangers could move Trouba that easily? Will there be a taker at 8M AAV?1. If the Rangers listen to me, and are not stupid, so they keep the young core as much as possible, that means we could have a window open for a long time, like 5-7 years.
He stays and he is part of that.
2. After next season, that = just 1 + more season, Trouba + his 8m can be dealt and we can expect signif part of that recovered
And only 3 years after this season, bread's deal is up.
Bread not moving now/this season, but it is reasonable to think rather than look bad by being here when we are likely, due to cap, to not offer him anything, let alone a deal for a lot less, he will relent and waive for a place he approves before his deal is done.
So KAM + Chytil both know that long term, $$$ is not a prob. They just gotta work with us to navigate the above/
As to KAM deal, I am predicting max 5 yrs, pulled down by term to 5.8 or 6.2
He will still be young enough at that point to get something in the 10/+ ish range, if he keeps progressing
imo prob yes assuming trade is not more profitable.
But who has cap for that, can + will do that?
Again, if he wants a cup AND get paid, a team w/a young emerging core is best, and that is Rangers
I don't know about the full 8 but we can get 6, 6.5 retained or 8 with a bad but expiring contract.Do you think the Rangers could move Trouba that easily? Will there be a taker at 8M AAV?
This is extremely difficult. He's coming off an awful season. 6 or 6.5 for what is essentially a mediocre 2nd pairing or tremendously overpaid 3rd pairing defenseman. He's has 3 more seasons remaining. Tough sell, especially when the whole league knows the Rangers have serious cap problems.I don't know about the full 8 but we can get 6, 6.5 retained or 8 with a bad but expiring contract.
He has to submit a list
we will have limited options, but we will have 1-3 or so choices at min
and main thing is any decent return ok, just make cap
I just don't see too many GMs willing to piss off Sather, nor do I see K'AM looking to screw over his current team/situation for some unknown.
Setting aside a team may have a dire enuf need to settle for a Trouba w/flaws, remember across the board RD is still in demand due to lower supply, that aside, as to taking back 1-2 bad contracts, those can be expiring, hence moveable, or easier to buy out cap hit wise.This is extremely difficult. He's coming off an awful season. 6 or 6.5 for what is essentially a mediocre 2nd pairing or tremendously overpaid 3rd pairing defenseman. He's has 3 more seasons remaining. Tough sell, especially when the whole league knows the Rangers have serious cap problems.
A significant pick is going to be needed to go along with him, or you're taking back 3-4M in salary.
This isn't getting rid of Ryan Reaves and one year of 1.75.
....
Devil's advocate: Why would he sign that? Offer sheet compensation for a deal up to 4,201,488 is a second round pick. Up to 6,302,230 is a First and a Third. If he's actually as good as everyone says, why wouldn't an opposing GM throw a 5M+ offer at him just to make Drury's life miserable? They could throw the same type of deal at Chytil and put the Rangers in a really bad spot.
The thing is Rags fans started by saying 3 x $4. If Someone offers 5 x $8.4 its not a little more money. I would be surprised if a player was offered this kind of deal if they would turn it down because they like the teams core.I said 5.8 - 6.2 x 5
If someone throws something like 9ish per x 7 that is a prob
howev, not seeing that esp since most clubs do not have cap flex to go there
imo KAM not gonna bolt for a bit more. Makeup of the club is essential
Rangers young core is key here
Several other RANGERS not rags fans may have said that #, I am early on as to why go half assed with a lower # if you can go fully assed and said 5.8 or 6.2 x 5. That 8.4 is a bit more, but just over 2m more per on generic team which is not likely to have a young core and opening window for as long as Rangers favors NYR.The thing is Rags fans started by saying 3 x $4. If Someone offers 5 x $8.4 its not a little more money. I would be surprised if a player was offered this kind of deal if they would turn it down because they like the teams core.
Who's the last Ranger you've seen in a commercial besides Henrik Lundqvist? Everyone says NY gives opportunities but I don't see anyone. Granted I am upstate so I may be missing it but who is getting these opportunities?Several other RANGERS not rags fans may have said that #, I am early on as to why go half assed with a lower # if you can go fully assed and said 5.8 or 6.2 x 5. That 8.4 is a bit more, but just over 2m more per on generic team which is not likely to have a young core and opening window for as long as Rangers favors NYR.
Said it before will keep repeating til it sinks in. Best chance NOW is lots of youth + coupla star contributors = long window, multiple attempts to win the cup. Alternate destination not so much.
So chump change offer, yes he's extremely tempted.
Ballpark close offer, home team this time takes it.
Also remember also benefits to playing here -- get comfy w/Madison Ave = commercials = other $$$.
They will always be the Rags to me.Several other RANGERS not rags fans may have said that #, I am early on as to why go half assed with a lower # if you can go fully assed and said 5.8 or 6.2 x 5. That 8.4 is a bit more, but just over 2m more per on generic team which is not likely to have a young core and opening window for as long as Rangers favors NYR.
Said it before will keep repeating til it sinks in. Best chance NOW is lots of youth + coupla star contributors = long window, multiple attempts to win the cup. Alternate destination not so much.
So chump change offer, yes he's extremely tempted.
Ballpark close offer, home team this time takes it.
Also remember also benefits to playing here -- get comfy w/Madison Ave = commercials = other $$$.
Who's the last Ranger you've seen in a commercial besides Henrik Lundqvist? Everyone says NY gives opportunities but I don't see anyone. Granted I am upstate so I may be missing it but who is getting these opportunities?