gabevh3
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2005
- 4,062
- 2,377
A point a Game player got 3 million for 1 year so that's a very fair deal.A few hundred K less than I thought
A point a Game player got 3 million for 1 year so that's a very fair deal.A few hundred K less than I thought
I cant project 70 points if we are going to discuss 30 points as next years projection. A 20-20 season should be a minimal goal imo.I mean, yeah, if it takes that long for him to get going and if all he ever becomes is Zuccarrello, that’s far from ideal and he probably doesn’t stay here.
Just saying with those minutes, his even strength production at 20 years old is hardly an embarrassment and it’s certainly still projectile to 70 points or more once he starts getting PP time and gets older.
It's just people having the need for instant gratification.Damn, lots of hate online for Kakko. Didn't he just turn 21? I know he hasn't shown crazy development in the league but sometimes things take time. Has he not shown any glimmer of hope in three years for some Rangers fans to be so down on him?
I think this is a great bridge contract with potential to be a huge bargain if he's able to take the next step that I believe he can take.
Or, you know, expecting a top 2 pick to produce similarly to other top 2 picks in recent years. Instant gratification though, yes.It's just people having the need for instant gratification.
Or, you know, have patience with someone who is still only 21 years old.Or, you know, expecting a top 2 pick to produce similarly to other top 2 picks in recent years. Instant gratification though, yes.
Or, you know, have patience with someone who is still only 21 years old.
People forget the guy is still only 21 years old. He just played 19 high octane playoff games where he contributed and did not look totally out of place. People also forget that he's 6'-3" and will probably be a 215lb bull in his prime. By far his biggest issue so far has been his lack of confidence and that will improve over time. Like others I see him as a 25 goal 30-35 assist guy who can be trusted to shutdown other top players in big spots. Not the most ideal outcome for a 2OA but that's still valuable as hell to have. Not to mention we might actually have a chance of retaining him after Laf, Miller, Schneider and others eventually get their pay day.
I really hope for more than that. That is setting the bar fairly low.
I cant project 70 points if we are going to discuss 30 points as next years projection. A 20-20 season should be a minimal goal imo.
I would feel better with a floor of 40. Actually Im hoping for at least 50 from Laf but 40 will be okay from KK.If he can become a 60 point shutdown wing by age 24/25 and get a long-term Trocheck-sized deal at a younger age, that's a pretty positive outcome for a 2oa. Ideal is Draisaitl (even though he went 3rd, but even still).
So few 2oa are "ideal" anyway. "Valuable as hell" is exactly how I predict his future play and future contract, so sign me the eff up!
I want to see 35+ points each from Laf, Fil, KK, and Krav next season. I think that's a fine bar, and hopefully one of them smashes 40. Shit, even Goody should hit 30+. We have four guys that are locks for 60+, so that gives us a DEEP top 9.
It would be nice but you also can’t say it’s “excuses” when there are a good number of examples of players taking longer. Like the Sedins, who went on to Hall of Fame careers despite producing similarly until about age 23 or 24.Would be much easier if he was producing like other 21 year olds, let alone like a star in the league as we were promised.
I’ve been asked to be patient in the face of really concerning trends and results for three years now. I will of course continue to be patient, and root like hell for the kid, but the excuses are tired at this point.
If he gets 40 Ill be satisfied but Im really hoping for more out of both Laf and KK. Enough Jesper Fast point seasons.Well I pointed out earlier that he scored 0.42 ppg last season, which comes to 35 if he had stayed healthy. Even just a minor increase in role and performance, combined with full health, will easily net 40 points for him. If he gets PP time or if he really explodes he will definitely surpass those numbers.
Yeah I’m hoping for more too but with no PP time, 40 points and a 0.5 ppg effort would be a nice step forward where I’d feel comfortable saying he will still be a 70 point player soon.If he gets 40 Ill be satisfied but Im really hoping for more out of both Laf and KK. Enough Jesper Fast point seasons.
surpassing the legacy of Jimmy Vesey, those are lofty expectations.I cant project 70 points if we are going to discuss 30 points as next years projection. A 20-20 season should be a minimal goal imo.
I see fewer people simply claiming that they think he’s on a long development curve vs. those that make endless excuses for why he hasn’t produced. It’s the excuses that are tiring. The kid needs to stay healthy and play better. That’s it. He’s been given plenty of opportunity.It would be nice but you also can’t say it’s “excuses” when there are a good number of examples of players taking longer. Like the Sedins, who went on to Hall of Fame careers despite producing similarly until about age 23 or 24.
Not if he is getting very minimal PP time. The only Rangers with more than 40 even strength points this year, that I am aware of, were Panarin and Zib. Running at .5 ppg with little PP time is actually good. 35 points in 70 games is right there.I really hope for more than that. That is setting the bar fairly low.
KK's career average in the NHL at 21 yo, is 0.369P/G. Fast's most recent season, a career high, is 0.415P/G. That's a difference of 4 points over 82 games (30-34). Kakko at 21 is arguably already as good as Fast's best season at 30 years old. The season Fast turned 22, he scored zero points in 11 games to sum up his entire NHL experience up until that point.If he gets 40 Ill be satisfied but Im really hoping for more out of both Laf and KK. Enough Jesper Fast point seasons.
I think people are going to be really pleasantly surprised by VK this year. He’s a year older than KK and has been developing really well despite some of the narratives that have formed around him.I’m so excited for Lafreniere and Kakko this year. I don’t expect much from Kravtsov to be honest. But also I expect he’s not going to get much power play or even top six minutes.
Figure these guys get most of the top six minutes:
Panarin, Trochek, Kreider, Mika, Lafreniere, Kakko.
That leaves not much for Kravtsov, Chytil, Blais, Goodrow, Carpenter, Hunt/Reaves/Gauthier/prospex.
I think people are going to be really pleasantly surprised by VK this year. He’s a year older than KK and has been developing really well despite some of the narratives that have formed around him.
I think the org is feeling pressure to play Laf and KK in the top 6, and it may very well be in the long term best interest of the club to do just that, but I am not going to be surprised to see VK outplay KK early in the season to the extent that it’s going to look really bad when Gallant buries him in the lineup.
If this team didn’t win the lottery and draft Kakko in 2019, we’d be over the moon stoked about the prospect of our top 10 pick Russian finally coming over to join the team. But here we are, understandably invested in an even higher draft pick and with a bit of a sour taste in our mouth because of how VK has handled his chances to date.
I think people are going to be really pleasantly surprised by VK this year. He’s a year older than KK and has been developing really well despite some of the narratives that have formed around him.
I think the org is feeling pressure to play Laf and KK in the top 6, and it may very well be in the long term best interest of the club to do just that, but I am not going to be surprised to see VK outplay KK early in the season to the extent that it’s going to look really bad when Gallant buries him in the lineup.
If this team didn’t win the lottery and draft Kakko in 2019, we’d be over the moon stoked about the prospect of our top 10 pick Russian finally coming over to join the team. But here we are, understandably invested in an even higher draft pick and with a bit of a sour taste in our mouth because of how VK has handled his chances to date.
All I will say is that I think people mistake my disappointment in KK for hatred.Kravtsov scored 15 points in 39 games in the AHL and then went home to Russia. Then scored 4 points in 20 NHL games and went home to Russia again.
If Kakko did those same exact things and went home to Finland you'd be burning him in effigy outside your home right now instead of talking about how he's been "developing really well."
I don't want Fast production. I was fine with letting him go. We need a lot more production.KK's career average in the NHL at 21 yo, is 0.369P/G. Fast's most recent season, a career high, is 0.415P/G. That's a difference of 4 points over 82 games (30-34). Kakko at 21 is arguably already as good as Fast's best season at 30 years old. The season Fast turned 22, he scored zero points in 11 games to sum up his entire NHL experience up until that point.
We're talking about the difference between 35 and 40 points here, but breaking Fast's career high would be a great sign for ALL of our young guys.
(Tbh, I thought we should have kept Fast if we were going to move on from Buch anyway, but whatever. It is what it is.)