Player Discussion Kaapo Kakko

B17 Apricots

Registered User
May 18, 2016
2,005
2,310
1000020302.jpg
 

QJL

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
6,329
4,669
THIS IS WHY YOU SIGN HIM LONG TERM LAST YEAR

Seriously. The Rangers have been paying players for performance and not for potential for as long as I can remember. Shesterkin’s 4 year deal was a huge miss. Lafreniere’s bridge was a huge miss. Kakko year to year is a huge miss. Most Stanley Cup teams have 2+ contracts that are truly forward-looking. We don’t play that game and we can’t make the leap because of it.
 

bleedblue94

Registered User
Jun 8, 2004
9,254
9,715
Seriously. The Rangers have been paying players for performance and not for potential for as long as I can remember. Shesterkin’s 4 year deal was a huge miss. Lafreniere’s bridge was a huge miss. Kakko year to year is a huge miss. Most Stanley Cup teams have 2+ contracts that are truly forward-looking. We don’t play that game and we can’t make the leap because of it.
Shesterkin comment is revisionist history. So many on this board were killing nyr for offering that cap in hit for 4 years. It's also crazy for people to just assume the orgs didn't try to term at cheap. The players have agents for a reason, players that want to bank of themselves aren't signing long term for nothing.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad