- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,737
- 12,774
I view KK as a puzzle and part of the strange puzzle last season was he actually played better after his injury. Maybe the time off help him focus? I really wanted KK to have a great playoff to erase the strange regular season but......I believe there were 3 times in 2-3 seasons where he started to heat up and immediately got injured. That accounts for both the playing better than the haters, worse than the people that blame coaches say. The second group is probably focused on those spurts of good play more than the haters who probably consider them statistically insignificant. There's probably someone here who knows how to calculate the p-value impact of his "good" games vs his norm.
Of course. BUT, if he absolutely wanted out, then he would not have signed before he was traded. Because I doubt Drury will just trade him to get rid of him, if there is not a trade out there that he likes. I think both parties are fine with looking for a new spot for Kakko, but both parties are also content with the idea of him staying.Has anyone thought he requested a trade, but signed anyway to get moved quicker?
If he goes, I will miss him. I was pulling for him. He was our first truly high end pick in forever.
He's disappointed individually, but you will never convince me he wasn't harmed by the organization in some capacity.
Better luck in your next stop if you are moved, kid.
The whole point is he likely doesn’t want to be here in the present or long term at this point in it…Nobody here (HF), nor Rangers mgmt. can convince me that breaking ties with KK and coupling him with our 29th (or whatever the hell it is) just to move up in a draft where........hell, I'll say it we "suck at" for a player that probably won't pan out anyway BECAUSE we don't know how to develop kids and just because our rival allowed Hughes to step right in on a horrific Devils team, it didn't mean we had to do the same. He was all of 18/19......a child, and IMHO he still is. He hasn't yet grown up, and would bet anything he misses home more than most (at least it looks that way).
I've said it before, the one "constant" that seemed to work for him....... was playing with Filip and Laffy. KIDS need their buddies every bit as much as they NEED mentors. Because of some circumstances eg: Filip and KK getting injured while Laffy was too busy laughing and playing like shit.......he lost a lot of confidence, while trying to figure out the whirlwind in which surrounded him. It seemingly was too much for him and now playing Monday Morning QB, it's easy to say that the Rangers should have left him with Hartford for a year, or at the least until he was tearing shit up and deemed "ready".
Again, I'd rather have a rock solid 3rd line defender with "some offense", than throwing shit at a wall and hoping it sticks some 3 years down the road. With our "average" defense, losing him will create a defensive HOLE which supposedly was one of the reasons as to WHY we acquired Wennberg, right?
I'd no sooner rather send him down for a few months and earn playing for the Rangers whilst hoping he grows up as his confidence rises. His worth might increase and other GM's might take notice, maybe even Drury.
Still rooting him on, maybe Laffy's light will come on for KK as well.
Your points are valid, not saying they're not. Just kind of think that KK loves his teammates (that's all he knows) and for a still young kid to up and move on from Filip and others sends him to "once again" unchartered territory (even if he knows a few). I don't believe he "wants to" leave. WHY? Because he took much responsibility with coach, as coach did the same. Surely, it's up to KK and maybe one more off season where if he improves his skating, could open up things for him. Here's hoping.The whole point is he likely doesn’t want to be here in the present or long term at this point in it…
instead of just keeping him around, waiting til he can make it to UFA, they actually deal him now while he’s cost controlled for 2 more season and some team will have a chance on that untapped potential happening because of the change in environment….
You deal while he can still bring back something quality in a package.
Not only that, you have younger and cheaper players knocking on the door for that roster spot that could realistically provide the same or better offensively and shouldn’t be a detriment defensively.
The longer it drags on when the guy rather play somewhere else and the org can’t give prospects that are ready NHL time/opportunity, the worse it is for all parties involved……
Kind of similar to the Nils situation.
On a side note, whoever said Kakko + 30 to jets for McGroaty + lower pick was on to something.
NYR and Win have a history of dealing together ( Trouba/copp)
Kakko being on a team with lambert/heinola, guys he knows, played with before, speak his language, etc would be an ideal landing spot for him….
If you want him to ever possibly reach his max potential, that’s an environment where I can see him being way more comfortable with less pressure/expectations
That's Shane DoanShould Kaapo stay, I'm hoping for this type of redemption year stat line.
Bonus points if you know who these first 6 years belong to
View attachment 893211
Top 10 OA draft pick. They went on to play over 1500 games with almost 1000 career points (2nd most in their draft class).
Let's say that he's a bust, and he will never be anything else but a third line winger in the NHL. Why does he need to go?He's a bust. He needs to go
NoHe's a bust. He needs to go
I don't think he NEEDS to go. However, if another team is willing to give you something that improves the team in an area of need, you obviously do it. If nothing is being offered that can improve the team in some way, you keep him because he provides a value. Maybe some team out there thinks they can unlock his potential and are willing to move a defender that would really improve the ability to move the puck and clear the zone. I am sure some people just want to move him no matter what. You move him in a hockey trade and nothing less. It wouldn't shock me to find out that Kakko would like a trade to a team willing to put him in the top 6 and give him a full season chance there. Lacking that, he is a serviceable 3rd liner on a reasonable contract and that is valuable.Let's say that he's a bust, and he will never be anything else but a third line winger in the NHL. Why does he need to go?
This is exactly how I see it.Looking like they are running back basically the same squad/core, so to me -
Adding a sturdy younger winger at the deadline who can play a solid defensive game and can play up and down the lineup for 2.4M, would be on the list for most teams. Including the Rangers.
Keeping Kakko is exactly that and you have him the whole year and you dont give anything up. During last years deadline we saw so many deals including him. While you are likely getting a needle mover up top, you are depleting top 9 forward depth at the same time.
If Drury is hellbent on moving him at some point - I think it will be good to see if he can rebound after a tough season offensively and if any of the other kids come up and push for more time, then you can think about shipping him out - hopefully with his value higher than what it is now.
But for me I think Chytils health is the key. Cuylle-Chytil-Kakko would be a solid line that if left alone could generate some good numbers. Kakko needs some skill to drive play because he cant do it on his own.
Not arguing with you but I often have asked myself about KK's skills in the past. What excellent tools do you see? Just curious for other people's opinions.KK has excellent tools but he needs to decide what kind a player he is. Until that happens, he’s just another guy. No idea if he’ll ever figure it out bit of he does he’s a very good player.
He definitely does not need to go. If that is what he is that is disappointing but fine unless we get a better option offered in a trade. Getting benched in the playoffs should hopefully generate some fire in his belly. I'm hoping he arrives in camp in the best shape of every player.Let's say that he's a bust, and he will never be anything else but a third line winger in the NHL. Why does he need to go?
He has everything except great speed, in my opinion. Good hands. Good shot. Quick in small spaces. Uses his body well. He just doesn’t put it together regularly. That’s his problem. And a lot of players are in the same boat.Not arguing with you but I often have asked myself about KK's skills in the past. What excellent tools do you see? Just curious for other people's opinions.