ah I wasnn't laughing at Holl being on there tbh. he's been legit great in a bigtime role.
I was laughing at a guy like Hanifin getting included when he's getting 18mpg and has 2pts.
Agreed, although Holl is actually 4th on the Leafs in TOI/GP too (though basically tied with Brodie and Muzzin for the 2-4 spots, all are between 21:49 and 21:38). While Hanifin is the clear #4 on his own team, and really should not be in any sort of Norris consideration at all.
Hanifin is the most egregious inclusion in this list, but really, to be in contention for best dman in the entire league, your own coach should consider you the best dman on your own team. This isn't the case for any of Holl (Rielly), Theodore (Pietrangelo), Hanifin (Gio) or Faulk (Parayko), based on TOI/GP so far. Even for Risto, McAvoy and Nurse, yes they're the #1 on their team, but only because there's very little competition.
Makar, Weber, Hedman and Josi have legit shots to win the Norris this year. Theodore, Risto, Hanifin, McAvoy, Holl, Faulk and Nurse are all off to good starts, but really don't have any sort of actual chance. It seems these rankings are basically based almost entirely on xGF% and OZS%, which is a massive oversimplification of what it means to be the best dman in the league. Raw xGF% isn't a particularly great stat, it makes no attempt to adjust for quality of teammates or opposition, it's a pretty small improvement on +/-, and nobody would base their Norris list on basically just +/- and OZS%.
The current top 10 dmen in xGF%, with at least 100 mins played, are:
- Makar
- Dumba
- Holl
- Jake McCabe
- Kulikov
- Ethan Bear
- Theodore
- Alec Martinez
- Devon Toews
- Chiarot
Not a great list, clearly. Mixing in OZS% doesn't help that much. With a larger sample size, maybe some sort of combo/weighting of xGF%, quality of linemates, quality of competition, OZS%, points and TOI would be OK. But relying on just xGF% and OZS%, especially with tiny sample sizes, makes for a crazy/meaningless list.