He’s already won something in Boston. Unlike Bourque.Really you wouldn't want him on the Avs? The last time the Avs acquired a Bruins Legend it worked out
Kadri already doing well as the 2C anyway.
He’s already won something in Boston. Unlike Bourque.Really you wouldn't want him on the Avs? The last time the Avs acquired a Bruins Legend it worked out
Boston should be competing for the 1st WC spot against the rest of Metro, I have a hard time seeing them pass Florida, Toronto, or Tampa.
In terms of asset management it makes sense to rebuild now, but that would be a slap in the face to Bergeron and Marchand. Chances are they'll keep aiming for the cup for as long as Bergeron is a #1C.
So if Tampa only played like 10 games this year and they were out of the playoffs you’d consider them struggling and make Kucherov for ??? Threads ?I don't factor in games that haven't been played because they haven't been played
wrong....the return would not be massive....he is 36 years oldThere would be no shortage of suitors.
The return for Boston would be massive.
Bergeron is everything you want in a player that has the ability to impact all three zones.
If that was the direction the Bruins were going, they should move Marchand as well at which point the rebuild would be short
wrong....the return would not be massive....he is 36 years old
if you search the list of active players 37 or older you will see there uis not much productivity there, and forwards do not age as well as defensemenDoesn't matter when you bring to the table wjat he does.
An all situations player.
So if Tampa only played like 10 games this year and they were out of the playoffs you’d consider them struggling and make Kucherov for ??? Threads ?
if you search the list of active players 37 or older you will see there uis not much productivity there, and forwards do not age as well as defensemen
But you said all the matters is games already played, so why does it matter if they played 10 or 17? If Tampa was 6-2-2 but due to other teams playing way more games, would you say they were struggling and “not a playoff team”?Boston has played 17 games
That is irrelevant when talking about this current season only. He’s a PPG all-around #1C… that’s a massive returnif you search the list of active players 37 or older you will see there uis not much productivity there, and forwards do not age as well as defensemen
But you said all the matters is games already played, so why does it matter if they played 10 or 17? If Tampa was 6-2-2 but due to other teams playing way more games, would you say they were struggling and “not a playoff team”?
Maybe now you’ll see the stupidity in not paying attention to games played at this point in the season
That’s not what you said. You said games played doesn’t matter only their current point totals. So why does games played not matter anymore? What’s your cut off where you suddenly stop caring about games played?Because you gave an unrealistic example where Tampa would only have played 10 games by the end of November that would never happen even if Covid decimated them that would never happen.
The NYI prove that, Covid has destroyed them and they are only now being shut down and even then only for what? 3 or 4 days?
The example you provided would never happen.
Uh what? That's insane. Sharks are in no position to move futures for Bergeron. And honestly at his age, even if we were contenders, Eklund is too good of a prospect for me to give up.Wrong thread -_-
But yeah give me Bergeron for Eklund + 1st + something
Doesn't matter how other 37 or older year old players are performing, there is plenty of production there from Bergeron.if you search the list of active players 37 or older you will see there uis not much productivity there, and forwards do not age as well as defensemen
I don't factor in games that haven't been played because they haven't been played
Don't think Bruins will make it in the top 3 in the Atlantic that means wild card spot and right now there is like 7 teams for 2 spotsSomeone doesn't look at games played