This is not so simple and depends on the draft. 2022 was long touted as a draft with not many high end forwards.
No a 50-60 point player is usually not worthy of 1OA pick, but it also depends how good the rest of the players in the draft are.
Look at 2012, the best forwards are Hertl, Forsberg, Teravainen. No single superstar forward in the draft. The best it produced was some quality top 6 guys, lower-tier first line players.
Hertl career avg is just under a 70pt player, career high 84pts in 69gp, 11OA in the 'weak' draft
Forsberg is around 55pts but it's brought down by his earlier seasons, career high 74pts in 77gp, he's closer to a 60pt player, 17th OA in the 'weak' draft
Teravainen is around a 55pts player, career high 76pts in 82gp, 18th OA in the 'weak' draft
All of them have a better PPG and career high than what some of you claim to be acceptable for the friggin 1OA Slafkovsky. It's this mind-numbing lowering of standards that I will call out every time.
I have no doubt the 2022 draft will produce player who get more than 60pts as their career high or career average. If it's not Slafkovsky then Kent Hughes and his foxhole should rightfully get all the blame for it.
What if Slaf ends up as the best forward from that draft class, but only produces 50-60 points a season. Is it a failure? At some point, an organization can't shape the pool of eligible draftees. So, if Slaf ends up as the best forward from the draft, then he was worthy to go 1OA regardless of his point production. And we won't know if this is the case for many years.
We could've drafted one of the two very promising defenders. No excuse for whiffing the 1OA pick and picking a middle6 winger with it.
The issue with a small fraction of posters in this thread is that they want to be right about Slaf and the draft right now after less than 2 full seasons of play. We won't know how things end up for the next couple of years.
Many want to be right about the development strategy. The book is not closed on Slafkovsky.
It's only a blown opportunity if the forwards drafted in a similar range end up as better offensively players. If the best the 2022 draft produces is a top 6 forward, then there really isn't much an organization can do.
See above, it didn't need to be a F and that's a false condition to place on the team. The Habs needed a C, a W, a D, and a G.