Confirmed with Link: Juraj Slafkovsky re-signs with the Canadiens 8 x $7.6M

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
31,865
35,043
Nothing better than getting in depth Habs analysis from leaf blowhards
True, but it's positive and they seem to like it.


I don't look to see what fellow hab fans think of a big deal, or what rival fans say in a public space, but rather what they say in quiet as that's when they're usually more truthful instead of trolling.


Being a hab fan doesn't help as we have a bunch of terrible and annoying fans that get opposing fans riled about and the thread just devolves into a clownshow.
 

HuGo Burner Acc

Registered User
Mar 30, 2016
4,682
5,304
Very good by kent. We did not follow the greedy trio of Maple leaf.

The only player with the possibility of earning more then Suzuki is probably Demidov. With the Salary Cap going up and him having his first NHL season at 19-20.

I don't blame the leaf (once) young players. They threw 11 mil at Tavares and then they
True, but it's positive and they seem to like it.


I don't look to see what fellow hab fans think of a big deal, or what rival fans say in a public space, but rather what they say in quiet as that's when they're usually more truthful instead of trolling.


Being a hab fan doesn't help as we have a bunch of terrible and annoying fans that get opposing fans riled about and the thread just devolves into a clownshow.

True but I've always found that there isn't any shortage of realistic pessimism among Habs fans as Habs have a rich history to base everything off of whereas leaf fans have been living in La la land since 67

I watched the video, they tended to agree with Habs fans sentiment. They liked it for the Habs.

At this point only butthurt sens fans are delusional enough not to acknowledge the Habs positive future so that's a very low bar. But I'm glad they're not too biased to be objective
 

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
26,600
15,719
Montreal, QC
But the crazy thing is, right now he's managing to keep his core guys (Suzuki, Caufield and now Slafkovsky) under 8M/yr.

Guhle is probably up next.

That's huge.

When these guys are in the middle of their deals, they should be a competitive team and have no one the roster making a ton of money and the cap keeps rising.

He's really set himself to have both cost certainty AND cap flexibility in 2-3 years.

Hughes is cooking.

I'm honestly surprised Slaf's agent counseled him to take this deal. I would have told him to keep making the haters hate and get a bigger bag.
 

417

BBQ Chicken Alert!
Feb 20, 2003
52,215
29,794
Ottawa
I'm honestly surprised Slaf's agent counseled him to take this deal. I would have told him to keep making the haters hate and get a bigger bag.
Oh 100%…and I kind of expected it, especially with the cap rising.

That's why I think its a good sign, says a lot about him. (not that him doing otherwise implies anything negative either mind you. I'm all for players getting paid.)
 

Nicko999

Registered User
Jan 23, 2008
8,078
1,979
Montreal
I totally agree but go back and look at all those goals. They were all the same. It was just one timers mostly on the man advantage. Galchenyuk also preferred playing in the snow more than perfecting his practice. I'm much more confident in players who are true gamers. Slafs been living alone since 14 and is a true pro. Sometimes you got to gamble. And on this gamble, the odds are good imo
Agree. I don't mind this risk. I actually like it.
I am simply saying as with every risk, it can backfire. No mater how much of a gamer Slaf is, his progression can always stall.
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,078
2,602
Oakville, ON
Seems to me, GMs have the option of either paying a player for what he's done (Gallagher), or paying a player for what he is projected to do (Slaf). Either way, it seems, people will bitch
The ones who b*tch also freak out (after) the bridge deal when the same player then wants $12M/yr after 4 years. A bridge deal basically throws all semblance of a pro system out the window. Hugo knows this (as a former agent) that you need your star players under reasonable contracts in order to compete otherwise you end up like the Leafs.
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,078
2,602
Oakville, ON
I'm honestly surprised Slaf's agent counseled him to take this deal. I would have told him to keep making the haters hate and get a bigger bag.
I'd be interested to know which players have Agents that Hughes works with, ones who understand the payment system is what's best for the player to flourish and the team to build correctly.
If a player/agent won't buy in they are dealt.
 

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
7,920
10,412
Curious to know how is Slaf's play lately.. I remember when he first started he got benched and seemed to have trouble.. didn't watch last season so did he improved so much to get this 7.6M deal? That's 400K away from Stamkos!
:eek3: Where were you after the All-Stars?

You missed all the fun of the CC/Suzuki/Slaf being a top 10 1st line in the league (CC was the 3rd wheel) and taking the PP from bottom of the league to top 10 once Slaf was put on it (despite Matheson never passing to him).

Slaf had 34 pts in 39 games at the end of the season (a 71 pts pace), finished with 20 goals and 30 assits after a slow start.
 

waitin425

Registered User
Jan 10, 2009
7,819
11,665
Canada
My God what an incredible deal all around.

We have really set the bar with that Suzuki contract. With any luck Demidov plays his way in his first two years to a similar contract. Dach will probably earn that coming out of his current deal. we can have 5 forwards all making around 37 million total.

Hugo is doing shit the right way.

Gonna be a massive steal in as little as 2 years.
 
Last edited:

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
28,293
10,892
My God what an incredible deal all around.

We have really set the bar with that Suzuki contract. With any luck Femidov plays his way in his first two years to a similar contract. Dach will probably earn that coming out of his current deal. we can have 5 forwards all making around 37 million total.

Hugo is doing shit the right way.

Gonna be a massive steal in as little as 2 years.
Ott did the same thing with their guys. Signing your kids out of elc when they are what 22 for most, takes them to like 30. So have to make the most of this second contract.

Still need to develop the young blue line and get a goalie.

Ottawa for example is 4 years into Chabot, 3 years into Tkachuk, 2 years into Norris, a year into Stutzle, and just starting Sanderson this season on their 8 year second contracts.

Caulfield a year in and Suzuki 2 years in. Have time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waitin425

Father Roy Richards

Registered User
Nov 1, 2022
63
77
The pew
PK - 9m+
CP - 10.5m+

This was almost 8 years ago. And now you see the diff btw a money manager, and a riverboat gambler.

It's true but neither was their 2nd contract, Bergevin bungled the Subban bridge obviously and Carey was just a bit removed from winning a Hart, what can you do? It was pretty likely going to go just about how it did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michelangelo

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
41,634
44,429
Curious to know how is Slaf's play lately.. I remember when he first started he got benched and seemed to have trouble.. didn't watch last season so did he improved so much to get this 7.6M deal? That's 400K away from Stamkos!
Stamkos? You mean the guy who is currently 34 years old and regressing? Nashville is paying for the player he was. We are paying Slaf for the player he’s just starting to become.
 

NobleSix

High Tech Low-Life.
Apr 20, 2013
17,080
16,456
CyberSpace
www.ilovebees.co
This is damn smart cap management. The internal cap has been set and good to see the players are buying in. Won't be like this forever though but it's great to start off with your 3 best forwards making under 8 mill and signed long term.

Love this deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waitin425

BehindTheTimes

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
7,424
10,169
I would agree with you but progression is not linear.

Imagine giving Galchenyuk that contract after his 30 goals season at age 21.

Not saying this will happen but saying there is not risk is wrong.
There is very little risk. All indications point to Slaf being a student of the game with an insane desire to compete and be the best. There is very little risk here, I mean sure he could become addicted to blow and become an alcoholic, but it would be out of character for him. So you right, the risk isn’t zero, but it’s damn close.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad