Player Discussion - Juraj Slafkovsky Discussion | Page 97 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Player Discussion Juraj Slafkovsky Discussion

He is definitely not terrible, actually he is one of few who can do the job. Gally and maybe Dach are the other two. Of course, he needs time as he is just learning the job and it is definitely not his preffer position. I think Caufield is pretty useless on PP, we need a leftie who would provide dual threat for one-timers.
He's fine in that position and improved his tip-ins over the course of the season. Obviously he'd prefer to be along the boards and participate in the actual play-making, because he is a playmaker at heart and not a Franzon/Holmstrom net disruptor type, but PP deployments will change as Demidov, Reinbacher and our new 2C join the fray.
 
He's fine in that position and improved his tip-ins over the course of the season. Obviously he'd prefer to be along the boards and participate in the actual play-making, because he is a playmaker at heart and not a Franzon/Holmstrom net disruptor type, but PP deployments will change as Demidov, Reinbacher and our new 2C join the fray.
Franzen was like 26 years old gtfo of here bro. You don't appear to be here in good faith. Who the f*** is Franzon?

Anders Franzon - Stats, Contract, Salary & More ?

Is that the guy? I'm getting sick of you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rien
Franzen was like 26 years old gtfo of here bro. You don't appear to be here in good faith. Who the f*** is Franzon?
Like the comparisons to Hossa, Jagr, Draisaitl, Rantanen, etc., age has nothing to do with describing a player's comparable archetype, in fact I said he's NOT stylistically like Franzen (Franzon was a typo on my part). This shouldn't be a surprise to you since you've recently described Slaf as a Marian Hossa type. Hossa and Franzen played nothing alike -- so which is it bobo?

I've hyperlinked the definition of the word archetype once again for your further education.
 
The PP sucks, but the player with the best rate of goalscoring in the league isn't the one that sucks, thats the point. The problem is the 82 games that combine for 25 points on the PP, which is pretty much the pace that Laine was on by himself.

Juraj, for all the beauty that he is, has no place on the PP, his IQ doesn't allow him to be an efficient bumper and he's goddamn terrible as a screen. Caufield, for all the love that he is, isn't a great player on the PP and this is well-documented through the years.

View attachment 1019196
Caufield was great on the PP until they brought in Laine. .3 goals per game vs .4 for Laine and Laine had the highest percentage in the league. All we did was cannibalize Caufield’s PP goals for Laine.

Laine’s shot is lethal. He’s in the right spot but he’s also stationary. So now we have Caufield out of position and he’s working to try to make plays rather than working primarily as a shooter.

End of the day our PP as a whole isn’t much different percentage wise with Laine as it is without him.

And yes, Slafkovsky absolutely should be on the PP. we need someone to go to the net and he does that well.
 
Slaf was ok, and like the other kids playing their first playoff game, he started playing better as the game went along.

He can be much better, and he's going to be better as he gets more comfortable playing nhl playoffs hockey.
He, like the rest of the line, was good in the 3rd. Nervous in the 1st, like the entire team. I just want some more physicality to counter the Caps. I know it’s not his game usually, but get in Thompson’s face a bit.
 
Just a recap of Slaf's regular season. He finished 124th in scoring overall. If we filter out young players, 25y and younger, that group scoring is led by Suzuki:
Slaf finishes
34th in points
54th in goals (CC leads)
27th in assists
9th in hits (led by his buddy Pospisil)
8th in blocks
 
I keep waiting for Slafkovsky to become a power-forward. But the reality is, despite his size, he's a much better passer than he is a puck-carrying, possession beast. He still needs to be much stronger on the boards and learn how to protect the puck. He runs out of space and time way too quickly. Hopefully, maturity & confidence gives him the tools he needs to take that next step.
 
  • Like
Reactions: habbubba
Caufield was great on the PP until they brought in Laine. .3 goals per game vs .4 for Laine and Laine had the highest percentage in the league. All we did was cannibalize Caufield’s PP goals for Laine.

Laine’s shot is lethal. He’s in the right spot but he’s also stationary. So now we have Caufield out of position and he’s working to try to make plays rather than working primarily as a shooter.

End of the day our PP as a whole isn’t much different percentage wise with Laine as it is without him.

And yes, Slafkovsky absolutely should be on the PP. we need someone to go to the net and he does that well.
No reason Caufield cant play high slot like he just did yesterday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: habbubba
He really need to be better with the puck

He was draft for those kind of moment and I was expecting more
Id cut him some slack along with the rest of the young players for yesterday, it was a first for all these guys and Slaf’s game went as it did for the others, nervous and tentative at first but better as the game went on.
 
I want to see Slaf deployed a little different.

He is often the forward breaking out of our zone and receiving the first clearing pass. He pushes it out to Suzuki or Caufield who then either carry it in, or dump and chase. Slaf simply can't make it down the ice in time for the forecheck and it is usually Caufield. I'd like to see them reverse that a bit. Have Slaf be the first to enter the zone and crash in the end boards and retrieve pucks for feeds back out front to Suzuki or Caufield.
 
I want to see Slaf deployed a little different.

He is often the forward breaking out of our zone and receiving the first clearing pass. He pushes it out to Suzuki or Caufield who then either carry it in, or dump and chase. Slaf simply can't make it down the ice in time for the forecheck and it is usually Caufield. I'd like to see them reverse that a bit. Have Slaf be the first to enter the zone and crash in the end boards and retrieve pucks for feeds back out front to Suzuki or Caufield.
I’ve been saying, they’re creating much more when one of them is carrying the puck in the ozone to then make a play. Having them in movement entering the zone instead of when Suzuki for exemple dump the puck while Slaf and Caufield are positioned at the blue line, they usually don’t have the time to get the puck back. It’s unrealistic to think you’ll win every puck in that situation.
 
Last edited:
Like the comparisons to Hossa, Jagr, Draisaitl, Rantanen, etc., age has nothing to do with describing a player's comparable archetype, in fact I said he's NOT stylistically like Franzen (Franzon was a typo on my part). This shouldn't be a surprise to you since you've recently described Slaf as a Marian Hossa type. Hossa and Franzen played nothing alike -- so which is it bobo?

I've hyperlinked the definition of the word archetype once again for your further education.
Hossa wasn't even as good as Slafkovsky at the same age.

I think you're losing the plot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JIMVINNY
I think it is important to move Slafkovsky to the 2nd PP unit until Demidov proves its a mistake. Slaf isn't the only problem I see as Matheson has struggled for much of the year on the PP and giving Guhle a chance on the point would also be something that would help to shake things up.
Matheson was actually fine on PP1. That unit was good. Just replace Dach with Newhook (or Dvorak for faceoffs). That will be unit 1B.

Unit 1A would be Laine-Heineman-Demidov-Hutson-Suzuki
 
Matheson was actually fine on PP1. That unit was good. Just replace Dach with Newhook (or Dvorak for faceoffs). That will be unit 1B.

Unit 1A would be Laine-Heineman-Demidov-Hutson-Suzuki
Heineman is made for the playoffs, why is he not playing more? Play Hutson the full 2 minutes of PP and spice it up with Heineman/Demidov/Suzuki. Laine and Matheson would have an opportunity to shine with that setup.
 
A player as skilled, strong, and enthusiastic as Slafkovsky should offer more than screening the goalie. He should do things with the puck that others cannot do, he should bowl over defenders and take shots. He didn't have a Slafsquatch game, it shouldn't hurt you to admit a fact. We all know he is inconsistent -- some blame his youth and think the inconsistency will fade away, you're welcome to believe this.

edit: it's simply strange to give credit to Slaf for his contribution for "screening the goalie" on the first PP goal. He wasn't anywhere near the goalie when Caufield fired his shot. I don't understand why people have to lie about his contribution so damn often.

View attachment 1019822
Prior to the release from Laine

View attachment 1019824
Right after it bounces off Roy's skate

View attachment 1019825
Moments before Caufield fires the shot -- note Roy's stick is ahead of Slaf's, Slaf didn't contain the stick but did play the body a bit.

He did everything right there but he was in no way shape or form instrumental in fashioning the goal, so what's the point of lying about it?

He was much more involved in the second goal for sure, using his big frame to disrupt the defenders and allow sneaky Suzuki and Caufield to do their thing.
I can't believe you singled this out lol

I mean talk about 'the little things'

On the highlight package I had to rewind this play like 10 times because I couldn't BELIEVE Slaf tied up the guys stick so Caufield could score lol, it's interesting to watch too because you think he's going after the puck himself and he totally could but the smarter play was keep the lane open the lane for Cole who buries it

Is that...iq? Naaah
 
I want to see Slaf deployed a little different.

He is often the forward breaking out of our zone and receiving the first clearing pass. He pushes it out to Suzuki or Caufield who then either carry it in, or dump and chase. Slaf simply can't make it down the ice in time for the forecheck and it is usually Caufield. I'd like to see them reverse that a bit. Have Slaf be the first to enter the zone and crash in the end boards and retrieve pucks for feeds back out front to Suzuki or Caufield.

Yep.

It makes absolutely zero sense for Slaf (6ft3, 230lbs) passing to Caufield (5ft7 with heels, 175lbs) who is up higher in the play, waiting for him to lead and drive the play.
 
No reason Caufield cant play high slot like he just did yesterday.
He's not going to be as effective as he was... end of the day we've given the shooting job to Laine. It's understandable because that's all he really offers and he's been effective. But Laine is easily replacablle with Caufield in that spot.

Slafkovsky should stay where he is. He gives us good net presence and he's got skill. I don't see them changing anything right now and I think it makes sense to just leave it as is. They can experiment next year. We'll have a better idea of what's what when we sort out the players in the offseason.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad