Rumor: JT Miller to the Rangers? (Part 2)

Akrapovince

Registered User
May 19, 2017
3,927
4,472
He has a full, no trade clause, he would have to waive himself.

He’s been the second best Canucks player in the last three seasons.

Having a bad season alongside the rest of our roster.

Top 10 and scoring in the last three seasons, and the best player for us in the playoffs last season.

It’s gonna be very interesting to see how much this “rift” lowers his value if at all.

Honestly, I don’t think it does, especially if the Rangers go after him, they want him badly apparently.

A RHD will have to be included.


Still has 24 points in 26 games this season
It won’t.

Teams will just outbid each other until market value or the Canucks will just hold him. Teams are there to make their team better, not anyone else.

If the rift lowered Miller’s value to the point a team offers a first round pick, do we really think no other team goes first + prospect and so on until he’s at atleast fair market?

Worse case, Canucks keep their playoff beast. Winning cures all.

Norris defensemen, Vezina calibre goalie, two centres that have put up 100 points. Both Selke calibre.

Let’s not pretend the pieces aren’t in place. They can re-tool without splitting the core and everyone will be less poopy pants.
 

mdobbs

Registered User
Oct 21, 2010
2,180
569
Zibby and Borgen ($11.2M) for Miller, Hoglander and Desharnais ($11.1M).

DeBrusk-EP-Boeser
Joshua-Zibanejad-Garland
Heinen-Suter-Sherwood
PDG-Blueger-Sasson

Hughes-Hronek
Soucy-Borgen
Forbort-Myers
Brannstrom

Demko
Lankinen


Panarin-Miller-Laf
Kreider-Trocheck-Smith
Cullye-Chytil-Hoglander
Edstrom-Carrick-Berard

Lindgren-Fox
Miller-Schneider
Vaak-Desharnais
Jones

Igor
Quick

What is this proposal? Miller is close to a top 10 center in the league. Zib is cooked at this point and the Canucks are adding here??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canucks LB

thefutures

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2017
3,008
2,967
I know the Canucks don't have to trade Miller right now or at any point. But hypothetical situation for Canucks fans:

If you had to choose would you rather trade Miller for Zib or just have Miller disappear for nothing?

I've only seen the Rangers twice this year but nothing seems like a better return than Zib. Which to me indicates this trade isn't happening.
Rather miller disappear than take that contract
 

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
79,557
34,787
The two teams probably want to swap JT and Mika for a change of scenery but the NMC is preventing that. No other deal really makes sense, like you say.
JT Miller does not have negative Value, Mika has Negative Value
JT Miller is a #1 Center and has 24 points in 26 games in a drama filled season.
He is also the second best player on this team, has been a force for us in the past 3 years and the Canucks do not have to trade him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JKG33

Captain Mountain

Formerly Captain Wolverine
Jun 6, 2010
21,165
15,312
They're both impediments as the NMC really leads into the Salary being an issue.

There are teams that can fit him in with out sending anything (or much) back.

Those teams are almost across the board bad teams. We're talking about CBJ/CHI/SJS's of the world.

Perhaps I'm wrong, but he isn't going to waive to go to those teams.

Better teams are pretty capped out and aren't going to move heaven and earth to add this player. Not now at least.

Columbus is two points out of a playoff spot.

Are we considering the Rangers a team he would consider waiving his NMC to go to? Because the Ducks, Jackets and Flames have more points than the Rangers and could easily handle the contract. If taking contracts back is part of the math, then you can add the Wings, Habs, Kraken, Utah, Flyers, Bruins, Jets, etc. to the list. And I won't ever count Vegas out of acquiring any player because they always seem to be in it even when it doesn't seem like they should be.

We don't know what his considerations for where he'd waive his NMC would be, but either way it seems like that is way more important a consideration. You take his NMC out and you can see him going to half the league. Keep it but cut his salary in half but still assume a small pool of teams he'd consider and it would still be hard to make a trade.
 

banks

Only got 3 of 16.
Aug 29, 2019
4,005
5,970
I'm a neutral fan, no ties to NYR or VAN. I hold no ill will for them. But these 2 teams seem to be on the very edge of imploding right now, and it's a pretty gripping storyline to follow.

Would be pretty cool to see both teams make a blockbuster trade with each other and see if either one can right the ship.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
86,534
87,557
Redmond, WA
The thread your on is reporting that chris drury is willing to do " bad bad things " to get JT Miller.

if that doesnt sound desperate, i dont know what does.

And your GM is on record saying that he'd consider trading Pettersson and Pettersson needs to play better, but I bet you wouldn't characterize that as the Canucks being "desperate" to get rid of Pettersson.
 

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
79,557
34,787

Horvat on JT Miller.

'It's definitely [been blown out of proportions]," Horvat told The Hockey News on Thursday morning. "It's always a tough market that way. Any little piece of information gets magnified in those situations, right? But I mean, that comes with the territory. It comes with playing there.

"The fans are passionate about their team. It's basically the only huge sports team besides the BC Lions and the White Caps. That's what Vancouver is all about, is the Canucks. So every little thing that's going on in that dressing room or going on with the team, it's gonna get magnified, for sure, and that just comes with playing there."

Horvat continued: "Unfortunately, you're gonna be on both sides of it, right? It's not always gonna be sunshine and rainbows. There's not always gonna be good things said. It's gotta be a tricky situation. It's gotta be tough. But if any two guys, or if anybody can handle it, those guys can."

"Miller and I got along great. There's gonna be times when you're gonna cuss each other out. There's gonna be times when you're not gonna like somebody, but at the same time, you respect everybody," Horvat said. "You're all friends in there, you're all teammates, and you're all fighting towards the same goal. Are you gonna get along all the time? No, but at the same time, he and I had a good relationship. Same with me and Petey"

"I was captain there, so it was my job to keep everybody even keel and to make sure everybody got long and that the team was fighting for the same thing, for the same goal."
 
  • Like
Reactions: CascadiaPuck

ToDavid

Registered User
Dec 13, 2018
4,232
5,335
Say what you will about potential locker room issues, people in this thread are talking like Drury is crazy to go after Miller. The guy has been an elite player for the last half decade. The only real concern is his age but you've got to think the Rangers are in win now mode, despite the bad year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forsbergaura21

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
86,534
87,557
Redmond, WA
I find it fascinating that Canucks fans are insisting Zibanejad has negative value because of his bad year but also want a mega return for Pettersson, who's having a poor year and his GM has called him out publicly :dunno:

Are the two the same? No, Pettersson's on pace for like 67 points while Zibanejad is on pace for like 48 points, Zibanejad has definitely been worse. But I don't feel like consistent arguments are being made for the two players, it seems like Zibanejad's season is being way overblown while Pettersson's poor season is being way understated.

Like Canuck LB above said that Zibanejad's contract is a negative while he also suggested Pettersson to Buffalo for Dahlin in the Pettersson thread.
 

Diversification

Registered User
Jun 21, 2019
3,360
4,328
Miller makes 8 mill , Canucks arent retaining nor are they rebuilding. picks and prospect can be part of the package but it wont be the centrepiece.

if im a betting man, and Iam....its gonna be


Zib, KMiller and a 1st or 2nd.
How is it possible that you can (sensibly) raise the consideration of cap constraints in the first part of your sentence and then immediately turn around and propose a trade where the Canucks ship out 8M and then take back 12M+?
 

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
23,368
22,267
Denver Colorado
Sign me up
5 more years after this on his contract........... amazing

Screenshot 2025-01-02 at 10.52.56 AM.png
 

KeyserSoze81

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
1,881
2,417
Rochester, NY
Punishment: Ottawa soon will have to forfeit another draft pick to make amends.
From this point forward, Ottawa's draft picks and prospects will be kept in escrow at the leagues office to be confiscated at will. The league will send a nicely printed statement each month to see how their resources have been used.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Look Up

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,855
11,700
JT Miller does not have negative Value, Mika has Negative Value
JT Miller is a #1 Center and has 24 points in 26 games in a drama filled season.
He is also the second best player on this team, has been a force for us in the past 3 years and the Canucks do not have to trade him.
75 point pace? We saw what happened to Zibanejad when he had 72 points last season...


GET RID OF HIM NOW!
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,742
27,725
New York
As others have said, we aren’t going to be paying like 450 million on the cap for three centers that are born in 1993 (now into their 30’s), so most likely any Miller deal would have to include Zibanejad.

It’s possible Trocheck instead, but I think he’s close to the bottom of list of players Drury would trade.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad