shaner8989
Registered User
- Aug 6, 2005
- 23,600
- 5,769
so its not an injury? link?
based on post#8 I think its issues with the coach,I just hope he's alright.
zero percent chance a player would be granted an indefinite leave because he butted heads with the coach imobased on post#8 I think its issues with the coach,
Or maybe whatever is going on was unknown to team but impacting his play enough to be benched.based on post#8 I think its issues with the coach,
wonder what happened?? has any player ever taken a leave after a spat with a coach?
It would be fair to say that Miller has "looked off" for the whole year, with a lot of people speculating that he has been dealing with an injury. While Tocchet made it clear that Miller was not benched because of injury, it should also be made clear that JT has been "off" for a long time now. So no, the benching is not the cause. It might have been the culmination of the issue, which now sees him taking time off.
Yep. I don't think they would use "indefinite" if it was something like that.zero percent chance a player would be granted an indefinite leave because he butted heads with the coach imo
Sutter and Torts wouldn’t have had teams to coach lolwonder what happened?? has any player ever taken a leave after a spat with a coach?
If something happened in the coaches office after the game, ie it got physical or a verbal argument that crossed lines. Maybe they decided it was best to give him leave.zero percent chance a player would be granted an indefinite leave because he butted heads with the coach imo
"Until The Rocket is fired"Yep. I don't think they would use "indefinite" if it was something like that.
This Taj guy is a real PoS
zero percent chance a player would be granted an indefinite leave because he butted heads with the coach imo