Yeah, I'd like to know which team D stats led to this, but he and Lily both have huge team defense bars, so clearly something is driving that. I didn't see him being atrocious, but I didn't remember him standing out on D except for the last goal.
Ive been really really impressed with Grundstrom. He plays the game extremely hard. Like you said, the difference between his game and a Labanc/Zadina is pretty big. May not show up on the scoresheet often but it definitely makes this a much harder team to play against than last year.
Bill Bergen once went 3-4 with 3 RBI. He still finished his career with a .170 batting average.
Yeah, that's what I'd like to know about these cards--what goes into team offense and team defense?
I would agree with this when Celebrini, Smith, Eklund, drafted/acquired 1D, Dickinson and Askarov have hit their potential.
I see more numbers there but still no explanation for how Dom puts together the pieces to the algorithm. (Like, what goes into the miscellaneous offensive impact category? What goes into defensive impact?) Am I missing that somewhere?
What? You must be mistaking me for someone else -- no need to project.
Couldn’t tell you for sure but usually the cards are fairly accurate to unbiased eye test. When the aforementioned Ferraro has one of those real bad games it’s usually reflected near the bottom of the card.
You also have to weigh how poorly Detroit played. The Sharks were the better team.
Yeah, I tend to agree, I'm just someone who likes explanations for how analytics work so we can try to make sense of them without just going along blindly, you know?
Sharks were the better team even though they played a pretty sloppy game too. I really hope they can start getting the execution down and clean things up for a good run in the 2nd half.
Yeah, at no point was that ever what I was implying, and I think you know that.
