Recalled/Assigned: JT Miller and Brandon Mashinter up; Ferriero down (2/18: Mashinter up with Powe out)

RangerBoy

Dolan sucks!!!
Mar 3, 2002
45,161
22,259
New York
www.youtube.com
Last edited:

UDnyr92

Registered User
Jan 6, 2011
305
0
NYR Recall JT Miller, Mashinter. Ferriero Sent Down to CT

@KatieStrangESPN
#NYR A couple of additional roster moves for Rangers: JT Miller and Brandon Mashinter recalled, Ferriero assigned to CT

Well, here we go. Roster shakeup underway. Torts is mixing them bottom 6, gonna find some good combos hopefully! :handclap:
 

silverfish

got perma'd
Jun 24, 2008
34,644
4,353
under the bridge
I see no need to rush JT like this. A poor decision IMHO. I haven't watched him in CT to be clear so my opinion is a little misguided. I think it would be unwise to burn his first year.

But, if he's a better option, then he's a better option.

EDIT - It's not on the AHL Transactions page yet. Things are usually broken there before the beat writers get to it. Not saying Katie is wrong, because she's usually spot on, but it's an odd thing.

EDIT 2 - Just got put on :laugh:
 

ImIdaho

Choo-Choo-Choose me!
Mar 21, 2012
4,722
0
I see no need to rush JT like this. A poor decision IMHO. I haven't watched him in CT to be clear so my opinion is a little misguided. I think it would be unwise to burn his first year.

But, if he's a better option, then he's a better option.

With what we had/have, I don't think this is bad at all, unless Miller starts skating in circles and he hits himself in the head with the stick when taking a shot.
 

Trxjw

Retired.
May 8, 2007
28,334
11,205
Land of no calls..
Like Mashinter being brought up. Miller, on the other hand, I don't really get. The kid looks out matched in Hartford. Maybe it's just to get his head right with a cup of coffee?
 

*Bob Richards*

Guest
Well, if there was ever a time to give Miller a look, this is it. Very interesting day so far.
 
Jan 8, 2012
30,674
2,151
NY
I liked Ferriero. Hopefully this means that Stu Pickles is in the press box. JT is 19, but the Devils gave Matteau a try for 5 games this season, and he's a year younger. Although I don't think they're playing him and have yet to send him back to juniors.
 

nevesis

#30
Sponsor
Jan 3, 2008
35,953
12,978
NY
I see no need to rush JT like this. A poor decision IMHO. I haven't watched him in CT to be clear so my opinion is a little misguided. I think it would be unwise to burn his first year.

But, if he's a better option, then he's a better option.

He's a man. This is hockey. No time for weakness from management.

He's young, He's hungry, He's ready.
 

NYR Viper

Registered User
Sep 9, 2007
47,786
18,362
Jacksonville, FL
Who the hell sits? I like the Mashinter call-up. Maybe Torts will use this as a try-out for that open spot? Give both players some practices and games and see who fits the role best?

I am not going to lie, excited to see them both.
 

Bleed Ranger Blue

Registered User
Jul 18, 2006
19,799
1,811
Interested to get a look at Mashinter - I think he really could fill a bottom 6 role.

Hate the JT Miller call-up - unless its just a cup of coffee until Kreider comes back. He needs time to develop down on the farm.
 

haohmaru

boomshakalaka
Aug 26, 2009
17,010
11,606
Fleming Island, Fl
Like Mashinter being brought up. Miller, on the other hand, I don't really get. The kid looks out matched in Hartford. Maybe it's just to get his head right with a cup of coffee?

I like the idea of giving the kid an idea what it's like to be with the big club at the practice facility and at MSG. Doesn't mean he has to play, but it gives him more to play for if/when he's sent back to the Whale.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,621
4,193
Da Big Apple
JT Miller will likely only get 5 games cup o coffee, unless Stepan is traded for D upgrade.

Gee, and SO SO SO MANY GUYS said there was NO POSSIBLE WAY he could be ready yet, even if it was not to finish, but just to skate fast and set up Ws.

I take my lumps so when I get it right despite all the calls to the contrary, I am within rights to say I'm vindicated. They would not bring him up and slow his development unless they either wanted to use him, or showcase him. Even if they just wanted to give him a taste to encourage him further, they wouldn't do that if playing him was a liability.
 

silverfish

got perma'd
Jun 24, 2008
34,644
4,353
under the bridge
Who the hell sits? I like the Mashinter call-up. Maybe Torts will use this as a try-out for that open spot? Give both players some practices and games and see who fits the role best?

I am not going to lie, excited to see them both.

Perhaps they both play and Powe gets an extra game to rest and practice with the team? Then Mashinter or Miller go back down?
 

E-Train

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
4,000
2,177
New Jersey
5 game look can't hurt for Miller here. Happy to see Mash get the call and hopefully pound Barch tomorrow.
 

pld459666

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,126
8,390
Danbury, CT
I see no need to rush JT like this. A poor decision IMHO. I haven't watched him in CT to be clear so my opinion is a little misguided. I think it would be unwise to burn his first year.

But, if he's a better option, then he's a better option.

EDIT - It's not on the AHL Transactions page yet. Things are usually broken there before the beat writers get to it. Not saying Katie is wrong, because she's usually spot on, but it's an odd thing.

EDIT 2 - Just got put on :laugh:

Cup of coffee for Miller, do not see him playing, but he will benefit from seeing how the big club prepares for a big divisional game.

I have no problems with a spot call up here and there.

Russing him, IMHO, is calling him up, putting him on the 2nd line and leaving him there.

I'd venture a guess he's on an auditing trip
 

Calad

Section 422
Jul 24, 2011
4,046
2,606
Long Island
I see no need to rush JT like this. A poor decision IMHO. I haven't watched him in CT to be clear so my opinion is a little misguided. I think it would be unwise to burn his first year.

But, if he's a better option, then he's a better option.

EDIT - It's not on the AHL Transactions page yet. Things are usually broken there before the beat writers get to it. Not saying Katie is wrong, because she's usually spot on, but it's an odd thing.

EDIT 2 - Just got put on :laugh:

He's playing on the AHL team, so his 1st year is already burned.

Edit- I am wrong, see a couple posts below me. He can play in up to 5 games without starting up his contract due to age.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad