Confirmed with Link: Jonathan Kovacevic traded to NJ for 2026 4th

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,576
22,934
St Petersburg
It's an interesting theory. I liked it more with Smith who could actually put an effective shift in at forward and serve a role as a PK D, but they rarely actually used him that way. I'm less enthused by 7D when it's a real rotation. But I could buy an argument that Kovacevic taking 9 minutes away from the other 6 D and giving more minutes to our top forward leads to more wins than Bastian or Foote skating around for that same time.
This is like I see it as one of the way the potentially can go. Our forth line doesnt look very solid and effective potentially - as offensively, as defensively. Kovacevich can play minor defensive starts and play PK role to rotate Hamilton/Nemec minutes. Of course this is an only one way they can try.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,835
35,254
NJ
So anyone want to take a stab at why the f*** the Habs gave us this gift?

I mean I assume their (dumb) reasoning was they saw their right side having Reinbacher, Barron, Mailloux with Savard as the vet and thought Kovacevic was expendable to them. Still dumb reasoning as Reinbacher was 19, Mailloux was 21, and Barron was 22. None were established NHLers yet and none really guys where they were absolute locks to make it. Kovacevic on the other hand was only 27 and had given them 2 good years on a bad team. Like it should've been you go into the year with Kovy and Savard then the young guys battling it out for a spot. If multiple guys look ready then you can move on from Kovy if you want,
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,982
14,869
I mean I assume their (dumb) reasoning was they saw their right side having Reinbacher, Barron, Mailloux with Savard as the vet and thought Kovacevic was expendable to them. Still dumb reasoning as Reinbacher was 19, Mailloux was 21, and Barron was 22. None were established NHLers yet and none really guys where they were absolute locks to make it. Kovacevic on the other hand was only 27 and had given them 2 good years on a bad team. Like it should've been you go into the year with Kovy and Savard then the young guys battling it out for a spot. If multiple guys look ready then you can move on from Kovy if you want,

Barron's waiver-eligible so that's a guy they wanted to keep. I think the issue for them was that if Kovacevic were ever to be the odd man out, he wouldn't bring back anything in trade - they got him off waivers to begin with - and he couldn't've been in their plans past this season.

It's a bad trade, but who knew Kovacevic had this sort of game in him - I doubt the Devils did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
30,270
12,592
Barron's waiver-eligible so that's a guy they wanted to keep. I think the issue for them was that if Kovacevic were ever to be the odd man out, he wouldn't bring back anything in trade - they got him off waivers to begin with - and he couldn't've been in their plans past this season.

It's a bad trade, but who knew Kovacevic had this sort of game in him - I doubt the Devils did.
Which begs the question: Did the Devils expect him to force Nemec out of the lineup?

I would say no, but maybe they were wary of too young guys playing big D minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad