mackinnon29
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2017
- 343
- 335
One of a king for sureJon Cooper is one of the biggest cry-babies in NHL and a sore losers. Im not surprised that he whines, pathetic man.
Exactly!Well logic in Cooper head... They fail. Moment before goal...
View attachment 561291
Yes, that's why I'm saying if the leaving men are unrelated to the play, the play should be resumed.That's not too many men.
It's not a problem if the player comes on the ice and plays the puck before the other player leaves. It's only an issue if the player who's supposed to be leaving plays the puck after the player he's subbing for already entered play.
This was a completely normal change and if you call this, you call 20 such penalties per game. And yeah, Lightning is the one who had too many men on the ice if any team had.
Ok. So if the "soon" to be leaving player doesn't touch the puck you can jump in like 30 seconds before he leaves the ice and it's ok? Your post makes zero sense.That's not too many men.
It's not a problem if the player comes on the ice and plays the puck before the other player leaves. It's only an issue if the player who's supposed to be leaving plays the puck after the player he's subbing for already entered play.
This was a completely normal change and if you call this, you call 20 such penalties per game. And yeah, Lightning is the one who had too many men on the ice if any team had.
Was the time thirty seconds, though?Ok. So if the "soon" to be leaving player doesn't touch the puck you can jump in like 30 seconds before he leaves the ice and it's ok? Your post makes zero sense.
Was the time thirty seconds, though?
Maybe under five seconds.
Yeah, but look. It's like the Brett Hull goal situation. His goal would've counted, even if his foot was off the crease.Ok good. You just created a new rule for Hockey. The 5 second rule. Problem is that currently that kind of rule doesn't exist.
Yes. They have before.You think the NHL would ever admit to making a mistake? Lol
Yeah, but look. It's like the Brett Hull goal situation. His goal would've counted, even if his foot was off the crease.
Same with Colorado. Kadri would've scored even without the guy out of the boards.
The twist to this is that Tampa had seven men on the ice at the same time, so the penalties to both cancelled out.
However, they never canceled a game because of it.Yes. They have before.
Yeah, but two additional players for Tampa were near the centre ice, so that negates Colorado's violation. I get your point, though. No disrespect.I'm not a fan of either team and I actually hope the AVS win the cup. But looking at the situation objectively, Cooper kind of has a point. Tampa's players and line change has nothing to do with the game, no one participates in any way. But what if Kadri waits for his guy to come closer to the bench before jumping onto the ice? That goal never happens. That AVS player is still on the ice while Kadri touches the puck. Not at all comparable to the Tampa change.
I really want the AVS to win, but what you’re explaining is what happened, Kadri gets involved before the player he is replacing got off the ice….You're allowed to jump on the ice if someone is going off for a change. It's only a penalty if he takes too long to get off or gets involved in the play. This is just hurt feelies.