It was mostly about the complete lack of clarity and consistency in how they treat DUI/DWIs.What does that have to do with me not wanting to see people who weren't impaired while driving charged with an impaired driving crime?
It was mostly about the complete lack of clarity and consistency in how they treat DUI/DWIs.What does that have to do with me not wanting to see people who weren't impaired while driving charged with an impaired driving crime?
It's a public discussion board, we are discussing the incident. People here are villianizing the driver but I can't have a speculation/thought about the victims?It's not the appropriate time or the appropriate venue.
It's a public discussion board, we are discussing the incident.
A small child or a very frail person could die for sure from being hit by a bicycle. In any event, serious injury should not occur to anyone even if it's not fatal.You might get injured hit by a bike but you most likely won’t die.
The collision between a bicycle and a pedestrian is far less likely to result in significant injury or death. Now if you’re riding a bike and purposely going fast or riding on an electric bike, you should be on the road. But if you’re just leisurely riding a bike the sidewalk is a after placeNo it's not. It's less safe for both because of the likelihood of collision.
There's a significant difference in speed between cyclists and pedestrians. Even a casual cyclist could be doing 10 mph past a pedestrian walking 2 mph. And at intersections drivers may be looking for pedestrians in a crosswalk, but a cyclist arrives into the intersection much quicker than a pedestrian.
In many places cycling on the sidewalk is in fact illegal for all those reasons.
The road doesn't belong solely to motor vehicles. If drivers actually obeyed traffic laws cyclists would be safe on the road except for circumstances that were truly an accident (the Gaudreaus getting killed was no accident. It was the result of drunk and unsafe driving). But many drivers don't want to deal with the inconvenience of having to wait a few seconds to pass a cyclist safely.
If its adequate, then its adequate. No one is ever going to do anything to rural roads with little traffic.False again, they are adequate but far from “safe”
But look at the damage to the children wife mother father grand parents just so he could pass another vehicle on the road
I live in Calgary, and I bike commuted every single day, year round, for 6 years, and I can assure you that this is not the case. Cyclists have to follow the exact same rules as cars do.Tell that the the dumb asses in charge in Alberta
This is absurd. A person should only be charged with impaired driving if they are impaired and not because they were impaired at some point.The problem with the limit, is allows for an alco to have his fix in the morning, then go to work,have a beer at lunch and then after work and still theoretically be under the limit -- that is alcohol in the system. They teeter on the limit, only takes one beer to send them over the edge, then over the limit.
Its scary a lot of people function like this.
Weed is another one, has zero tolerance where I am, regardless if you smoked days ago.. boom. busted. Do not pass go. Time to do the same with the booze imo.
Society cannot exist without law. Law is the backbone of society. It shapes society and holds it together.We need more common sense and respect for the fellow man. Society has become complete pond scum.
I don't know if this is the case anywhere in North America, but there are some countries in Europe where you can be granted a special driver's license after a DUI, where you're only allowed to drive a car that starts after a breathalyzer test.It seems the easy solution is to make breathalyzer start ups mandator for life after the first or second DUI.
Or just make it a standard feature in all cars. Problem solved.
I live in Calgary, and I bike commuted every single day, year round, for 6 years, and I can assure you that this is not the case. Cyclists have to follow the exact same rules as cars do.
Honestly it's all the false confessions etc that I can't get behind. I've been with my wife over 10 years and I've promised, should all the gods forbid anything happen to her, I would not ask for death.Eh. I think the death penalty can be used in very extreme cases of people with no remorse who continue to do f***ed up shit. What does keeping them in prison do if there’s absolutely no chance at rehabilitation. Why put the lives of those with a chance of rehabilitation in further danger?
What's the hot take? Driving under the influence causes accidents and deaths every year.Here come the insane hot takes.
This is horrendous news though. And also focus on the mega-aggressive lane weaving as well.
Breathalyzers are easily bypassedIt seems the easy solution is to make breathalyzer start ups mandator for life after the first or second DUI.
Or just make it a standard feature in all cars. Problem solved.
It's usually a part of a plea in the US for a reduced time of restriction.I don't know if this is the case anywhere in North America, but there are some countries in Europe where you can be granted a special driver's license after a DUI, where you're only allowed to drive a car that starts after a breathalyzer test.
I think it should be standardized in all new cars though.