I don't think you understand what "pragmatic" means.
That is just complete bullshit. Your roads are definitely up to par for cyclists. What isn't up to par is your driving habits, drivers education and overall attitude. This is coming from a northern european who has spent months in north america and closely observed the driving culture around europe, asia and north america.I hope someday we can get to a point where biking on roads is safe for everyone, but most of our roads aren't designed for that, especially in rural areas. I blame society, as we've kinda come to normalize the idea that roads should be shared. They should be, but that entails them being designed and built to be, and they simply aren't. We shouldn't have normalized that idea so quickly when so many of our roads aren't up to par.
This is not even close to what he saidI don't think you understand it either if you think the safest way to bike is to simply not bike.
DING DING DINGThat is just complete bullshit. Your roads are definitely up to par for cyclists. What isn't up to par is your driving habits, drivers education and overall attitude. This is coming from a northern european who has spent months in north america and closely observed the driving culture around europe, asia and north america.
For sure.I'm also no lawyer, but there's the possibility that if/when he is sentenced it could be concurrent rather than consecutive and they may not give him the full 10 years. Even if it's the max and consecutive, 20 years really isn't all that much for killing two people, and completely turning the world upside for the friends/families involved.
So, what is it? "Only bike where there aren't any cars". That's not pragmatic either for where Gaudreau lives.This is not even close to what he said
Does someone have a gun to your head posting this? Who in their right mind wakes up in a hurry to defend a drunk driver who killed two peopleWhere do we have HIS lawyer chiming in? We do not have the entire picture--we do have the cops and DA building a slam dunk case. Before the statements given was his rights read to him. Did he suffer any injuries at the time of the accident that could have affected his mind--like a concussion? I was in an accident a few years ago and suffered a concussion that caused me some harm. Has the doctors released the drivers medical results.
So no we do not have all the information. We have only one side
What about Matthew?This is all my opinion, but the way I view how harsh the punishment is that ultimately he took a life because of his actions, albeit it wasn't purposefully taking a life. So therefor off the hop, if he intended to then it should be 1 for 1 for life in prison, but because it wasn't intentional, I reduce that to half of what the decent portion of life should be so approximately 30 years (60 good years of life), then on top of that he was also negligent by purposefully drinking and driving, so you automatically get an extra 10.
So 40 years, but can be reduced to 30 if shown great remorse and being a good person whilst in prison. That way if you get out, you can at least do something and it isn't a full life punishment, but also if you get out people can't say he got away with something.
But as I said before, my guess is he gets 5 years and gets out in 3.
Most european drivers suck too though. Especially france and italy. But north europe is probably better.That is just complete bullshit. Your roads are definitely up to par for cyclists. What isn't up to par is your driving habits, drivers education and overall attitude. This is coming from a northern european who has spent months in north america and closely observed the driving culture around europe, asia and north america.
Where do we have HIS lawyer chiming in? We do not have the entire picture--we do have the cops and DA building a slam dunk case. Before the statements given was his rights read to him. Did he suffer any injuries at the time of the accident that could have affected his mind--like a concussion? I was in an accident a few years ago and suffered a concussion that caused me some harm. Has the doctors released the drivers medical results.
So no we do not have all the information. We have only one side
I guess what you are trying to say is, if I tell my kid not to go with strangers it's not because I blame the previous kids that have been kidnapped, but more that I'm trying to put a system in place where they recognize in the future that there could be danger in such situation.For what it's worth, know I'm with you on this.
To try and clarify what I THINK some others are trying to say, though - I listen to a few true crime podcasts and one host is a former detective named Paul Holes. He brought up a salient point that muddies these discussions sometimes. It's the importance of conducting risk assessment to improve survivability chances, even though sometimes people step over and make it sound like victim blaming.
I haven't read all of the thread, so I'm sure I missed out on some comments. But hopefully the reasonable people can acknowledge the blame goes on the drunk driver. And, ultimately, the Gaudreaus are victims of that drunk driving.
I also want to minimize the risk of future bicyclists, like you and others, by emphasizing steps that can be taken to improve your chances. I believe you know those steps. But others may not. And even if none of the precautionary steps are taken, let's be clear it's still the drunk driver's fault.
Hopefully that makes sense. And hopefully that helps some who were trying to make the distinction but struggling to find the words.
Alcohol may not be, but the lack of respect people show for what it can do to a person is.Alcohol isn’t the problem. I do think America has a weird drinking culture though.
I don't think you understand it either if you think the safest way to bike is to simply not bike.
The lesson for cyclists to take away here is that drivers are aggressive assholes that give no regards for the safety of cyclists on the road. Biking away from cars is just safer than biking near cars, because drivers don't respect cyclists, pedestrians and even other drivers in this country.
I think you're heavily overestimating aggressive drivers hereIf he was sober, he wouldn't have attempted to aggressively pass a vehicle on the right side (shoulder).
The real problem is not the lack of punishment when someone is killed, it’s the lack of punishment when someone is not killed.I'm not a lawyer, or American, but this was a quick google search for New Jersey Car Murder.
Now x 2.
Says the family can pursue a a wrongful death claim in civil court as well.
Death by auto is a second degree crime punishable by up to 10 years in state prison and a fine up to $200,000. The driver will also be required to serve 85% of his sentence before he is eligible for parole.
I'd imagine there are some insurance policies in place for Johnny as well as the contract.Holy hell…what a tragedy. Completely devastating loss and 100% avoidable. What unspeakable grief one selfish person’s actions have caused.
At the risk of sounding insensitive, what obligation do the Jackets have to pay his remaining contract? His family would certainly benefit from the payout of the remaining guaranteed contract; but Columbus would seemingly have an out due to this unthinkable and unexpected loss, right?
Yikes. What a shit thing to hear today. RIP Gaudreau boys.