SlpLessInMuskoka18
Registered User
- Aug 13, 2018
- 662
- 242
2 years into being a Leaf and we're already trashing Tavares?
On the decline? He's 1 year removed from the best season of his career.
Oh stfu, half the dudes you listed aren't even better than Tavares.Matthews, Eichel, Barzal, Malkin, Crosby, Draisital, Mcdavid, Mackinnon, Petterson, Scheifele, Barkov, O'Reilly, Aho, Bergeron....14 centers off the top of my head would all be taken ahead of Tavares in a draft for next season. Factor in his sub par skating and his contract worries me moving forward as he ages. Tavares had a career high of 38 goals before coming to Toronto. Mix in Marner in his contract year, Tavares coming home to play and that 47 is inflated. This year he was on pace for 34. The Tavares contract can easily be argued to be a mistake for who he is as a player, the standard it set for payscale on that team(aka maximize every dollar) and spend 11 million on a 2c when your 4.5 million dollar 2c was more than capable....and the Dcore is still a failure.
Personally I wouldn't rank Barzal, Pettersson, Aho and Barkov ahead of Tavares.Matthews, Eichel, Barzal, Malkin, Crosby, Draisital, Mcdavid, Mackinnon, Petterson, Scheifele, Barkov, O'Reilly, Aho, Bergeron....14 centers off the top of my head would all be taken ahead of Tavares in a draft for next season. Factor in his sub par skating and his contract worries me moving forward as he ages. Tavares had a career high of 38 goals before coming to Toronto. Mix in Marner in his contract year, Tavares coming home to play and that 47 is inflated. This year he was on pace for 34. The Tavares contract can easily be argued to be a mistake for who he is as a player, the standard it set for payscale on that team(aka maximize every dollar) and spend 11 million on a 2c when your 4.5 million dollar 2c was more than capable....and the Dcore is still a failure.
Personally I wouldn't rank Barzal, Pettersson, Aho and Barkov ahead of Tavares.
Yes Barzal had a great rookie season with 85 points and won the Calder Trophy. However since than he had 62 points in 82 games in the 2019 season and this past season he had 60 points in 68 games played when the season was suspended on March 12th. So was his rookie season a fluke in terms of his stats, because since Barry Trotz became his coach his numbers have dropped.
Pettersson has not yet had at least 30 goals or 70 points in his 2 NHL seasons and a lot of his hype comes from Canucks fans who consider him to be a top 5 player.
Aho had a great season in 2019, however Tavares has done a lot more.
Barkov is a good player, although I think gets a lot of the hype he gets is due to the market he plays in.
Matthews, Sid, Drai, McDavid, Mack, Malkin and Bergeron are better than JT.Matthews, Eichel, Barzal, Malkin, Crosby, Draisital, Mcdavid, Mackinnon, Petterson, Scheifele, Barkov, O'Reilly, Aho, Bergeron....14 centers off the top of my head would all be taken ahead of Tavares in a draft for next season. Factor in his sub par skating and his contract worries me moving forward as he ages. Tavares had a career high of 38 goals before coming to Toronto. Mix in Marner in his contract year, Tavares coming home to play and that 47 is inflated. This year he was on pace for 34. The Tavares contract can easily be argued to be a mistake for who he is as a player, the standard it set for payscale on that team(aka maximize every dollar) and spend 11 million on a 2c when your 4.5 million dollar 2c was more than capable....and the Dcore is still a failure.
The more I think about it, I should have included Eichel on my list of him not being better than Tavares.Matthews, Sid, Drai, McDavid, Mack, Malkin and Bergeron are better than JT.
Eichel, O'Reilly, Scheifele, and even Barkov are debatable.
Barzal, Petterson and Aho are not better than JT at this point of their career.
There's going to be a lot of scrutiny on Tavares' quality of play if and when the playoff format kicks off this summer. Surely he'll have had time to heal from whatever was supposedly bothering him all year, and foot speed is going to be a question as well. Shift to shift, he just wasn't the same as in 2019. There were times when he looked like he had traded legs with Jason Spezza, and also couldn't handle the puck in traffic at all (probably from the hand injury sustained in the fall).
Those posters also need to remember just how great Tavares was in his first season with Toronto. None of us predicting a 47 goal and 88 points. I'm sure if we go back to see the thread when his signing was made official and knowing the pressure he would have coming home and the type of contract he just signed, we would have been happy seeing him score only 40 goals.I think some posters need to go back and recall that we had no legit centers in the top 6 after Sundin left, until Tavares and Matthews came on board. We were running Bozak as the #1 center for years. Tavares "struggled" this year and was still close to being a PPG player. And that's him not playing well. The man is elite, or close to it, and he's not even our best center.
You make a good point. Tavares has also never relied on foot speed, ever. That was always a criticism going back to when he was a teenager. He got better in long island but even then it was just average. I think his game translates pretty well tbh. He's arguably the best player in the league around the crease.I don't think there's any sense in hoping for the footspeed to figure itself out, it's going to be more of a question of how much he'll be able to adapt his game closer to a Jagr/Thornton playmaker that buys himself time and space with his power instead of his speed. If Pavelski can be a 30-40 goal scorer through his mid-late 30s, I don't see why Tavares can't.
This is a great example of a Tavares goal when he's around the crease.You make a good point. Tavares has also never relied on foot speed, ever. That was always a criticism going back to when he was a teenager. He got better in long island but even then it was just average. I think his game translates pretty well tbh. He's arguably the best player in the league around the crease.
I'd put a lot of money on people here who are crapping all over him loving him signing at the time. Like I said before, he was nearly a PPG player and not playing well. Neither was the team. Add in a coaching change to that. This wasnt a great season for the Leafs pre-covid.Those posters also need to remember just how great Tavares was in his first season with Toronto. None of us predicting a 47 goal and 88 points. I'm sure if we go back to see the thread when his signing was made official and knowing the pressure he would have coming home and the type of contract he just signed, we would have been happy seeing him score only 40 goals.
Here was the thread from July 1, 2018 when the Leafs officially signed Tavares and I don't see any negative comments about signing him.I'd put a lot of money on people here who are crapping all over him loving him signing at the time. Like I said before, he was nearly a PPG player and not playing well. Neither was the team. Add in a coaching change to that. This wasnt a great season for the Leafs pre-covid.
Exactly. Tavares was never known for foot speed, so I believe it was just a question of him getting his hand healthy.I don't think there's any sense in hoping for the footspeed to figure itself out, it's going to be more of a question of how much he'll be able to adapt his game closer to a Jagr/Thornton playmaker that buys himself time and space with his power instead of his speed. If Pavelski can be a 30-40 goal scorer through his mid-late 30s, I don't see why Tavares can't.
I don't think there's any sense in hoping for the footspeed to figure itself out, it's going to be more of a question of how much he'll be able to adapt his game closer to a Jagr/Thornton playmaker that buys himself time and space with his power instead of his speed. If Pavelski can be a 30-40 goal scorer through his mid-late 30s, I don't see why Tavares can't.
Those posters also need to remember just how great Tavares was in his first season with Toronto. None of us predicting a 47 goal and 88 points. I'm sure if we go back to see the thread when his signing was made official and knowing the pressure he would have coming home and the type of contract he just signed, we would have been happy seeing him score only 40 goals.
A career season in 2018-19 for Tavares would have been scoring 40 goals, since his previous high was 38 goals. However did any Leafs fans honestly expect him to end up with 47 goals?I don't disagree with your overall point, but I totally expected a career year for Tavares in his first season. He had never played with anyone half as good as Marner before.
Look at the Maple Leafs roster they had during the 2015-16 season when they finished in last place overall, plus it being prior to having John Tavares and Auston Matthews.I am constantly surprised at how a player either has to be the worst or the best ever. No middle ground, no nuance, no fluctuations. JT had a weak year by his standards. He looked slow and uncoordinated for large stretches of the year. Despite that obvious struggle, he also had stretches where he was a dominant force and still managed close to PPG and 34g pace while playing tough matchups all year. He also battled an injury and the birth of his first child.
We're obviously a better team with him and he's obviously got another gear than he had this year. We saw it a year ago, it really shouldn't be hard to imagine that a guy will bounce back at 29. Sheesh.
Wilson wouldn’t discuss San Jose’s pitch, but word is he told Tavares, “You are the final piece for us.” It has also been rumoured (but never confirmed) that the Sharks were willing to pay $13.5 million per year for seven years. “That was a confident group,” one source says. “They felt they were the best option for John, and they showed it.”
The top 2 lines are pretty set for the next 3 or 4 years if Robertson can break in at LW.
Any combination of; Robertson-AM-Willy / Hyman-JT-Marner - Finding which combo of LW and RW for each line is the only thing. I'd like this the best.
Would rather go with three deadly lines (with running short bench when needed i.e. 2 lines more often)
Hyman-Matthews-Marner
Mikheyev-Tavares-Kapanen
Robertson-Nylander-Johnsson/Kerfoot/xxx
4th line
Dont think Nylander would get enough ice time as a 3C. I also dont think Kap is a good fit in the top 6. Pretty brutal tunnel vision and doesnt use his linemates well.Would rather go with three deadly lines (with running short bench when needed i.e. 2 lines more often)
Hyman-Matthews-Marner
Mikheyev-Tavares-Kapanen
Robertson-Nylander-Johnsson/Kerfoot/xxx
4th line